-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CTFE engine: small cleanups #87089
Merged
Merged
CTFE engine: small cleanups #87089
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some changes occured to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri Some changes occured to the CTFE / Miri engine cc @rust-lang/miri |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jul 12, 2021
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit a85f4afd43d8746a8d8bcd419a31700c31c497e3 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 12, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Jul 12, 2021
RalfJung
force-pushed
the
ctfe-memory-cleanup
branch
from
July 12, 2021 18:10
a85f4af
to
6b26640
Compare
@bors r=oli-obk |
📌 Commit 6b26640 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Jul 12, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#86344 (Split MaybeUninit::write into new feature gate and stabilize it) - rust-lang#86811 (Remove unstable `io::Cursor::remaining`) - rust-lang#86846 (stdio_locked: add tracking issue) - rust-lang#86887 (rustdoc: remove dead code in `clean`) - rust-lang#87007 (Fix rust-analyzer install when not available.) - rust-lang#87035 (Fix implementors display) - rust-lang#87065 (Fix ICE with unsized type in const pattern) - rust-lang#87070 (Simplify future incompatible reporting.) - rust-lang#87077 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#87078 (Rustdoc: suggest removing disambiguator if linking to field) - rust-lang#87089 (CTFE engine: small cleanups) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed these while preparing a large PR, and figured I'd better send them ahead to not muddy the diff unnecessarily.
r? @oli-obk