Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique #93546
Conversation
rustbot
added
the
T-compiler
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
|
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
⌛ Trying commit 22872e5 with merge 2880258e9765636ef9bf3ca1d8241ceb7bc39feb... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
|
Queued 2880258e9765636ef9bf3ca1d8241ceb7bc39feb with parent 547f2ba, future comparison URL. |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (2880258e9765636ef9bf3ca1d8241ceb7bc39feb): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-perf
|
r? @jonas-schievink (as suggested by github), I'm not familiar with this area at all. |
|
📌 Commit 22872e5 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
…askrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#92528 (Make `Fingerprint::combine_commutative` associative) - rust-lang#93221 ([borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns) - rust-lang#93542 (Prevent lifetime elision in type alias) - rust-lang#93546 (Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique) - rust-lang#93571 (better suggestion for duplicated `where` clause) - rust-lang#93574 (don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop) - rust-lang#93590 (More let_else adoptions) - rust-lang#93592 (Remove unused dep from rustc_arena) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
No description provided.