Rollup of 8 pull requests #93594
Merged
Rollup of 8 pull requests #93594
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The previous implementation swapped lower and upper 64-bits of a result of modular addition, so the function was non-associative.
Previously, when rustc was provided an async function that tried to mutate through a shared reference to an implicit self (as shown in the ui test), rustc would suggest modifying the parameter signature to `&mut` + the fully qualified name of the ty (in the case of the repro `S`). If a user modified their code to match the suggestion, the compiler would not accept it. This commit modifies the suggestion so that when rustc is provided the ui test that is also attached in this commit, it suggests (correctly) `&mut self`. We try to be careful about distinguishing between implicit and explicit self annotations, since the latter seem to be handled correctly already. Fixes rust-lang#93093
…aelwoerister Make `Fingerprint::combine_commutative` associative The previous implementation swapped lower and upper 64-bits of a result of modular addition, so the function was non-associative. r? `@Aaron1011`
[borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns Previously, when rustc was provided an async function that tried to mutate through a shared reference to an implicit self (as shown in the ui test), rustc would suggest modifying the parameter signature to `&mut` + the fully qualified name of the ty (in the case of the repro `S`). If a user modified their code to match the suggestion, the compiler would not accept it. This commit modifies the suggestion so that when rustc is provided the ui test that is also attached in this commit, it suggests (correctly) `&mut self`. We try to be careful about distinguishing between implicit and explicit self annotations, since the latter seem to be handled correctly already. This is my first PR here so I'm pretty sure I probably missed something/could use better terminology. I also didn't try to make the match exhaustive since implicit self is the only real special case that I need to handle (that I'm aware of), and I'm pretty sure there's a cleaner way to do this so any advice would be greatly appreciated! (I'm also not terribly confident about how I wrote the ui tests) here is your cc as requested `@compiler-errors` This is an attempt to fix rust-lang#93093
…oli-obk Prevent lifetime elision in type alias Fixes rust-lang#93401. Apparently, the problem has been fixed in the compiler. r? `@oli-obk`
Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique
…tion, r=lcnr better suggestion for duplicated `where` clause fixes rust-lang#93567
… r=lcnr don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop adds a check that our `lhs` expression is actually within the conditional part of the `while` loop, instead of anywhere in the `while` body. fixes rust-lang#93486
More let_else adoptions Continuation of rust-lang#89933, rust-lang#91018, rust-lang#91481, rust-lang#93046.
Remove unused dep from rustc_arena
rustbot
added
T-compiler
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=8 |
|
📌 Commit 93155c5 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Feb 2, 2022
|
Finished benchmarking commit (27f5d83): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Fingerprint::combine_commutativeassociative #92528 (MakeFingerprint::combine_commutativeassociative)whereclause #93571 (better suggestion for duplicatedwhereclause)letdue to bad assignment expressions inside ofwhileloop #93574 (don't suggest addingletdue to bad assignment expressions inside ofwhileloop)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup