Swap DtorckConstraint to DropckConstraint

[b-ncMN]

This change was made as per suspicion that this struct was never renamed after consistent use of DropCk.

This also clarifies the meaning behind the name of this structure.

Fixes #94310

[rust-highfive]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @oli-obk (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

[b-ncMN]

@bors try

[bors]

@InfRandomness: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users

[b-ncMN]

How do I manually launch a workflow on this?

[oli-obk]

CI is broken right now. Or do you need a try build for something specific?

[oli-obk]

You can run ./x.py check locally to quickly see if everything at least compiles

[b-ncMN]

CI is broken right now. Or do you need a try build for something specific?

I've wanted to confirm the formatting is correct, I tested it locally and pushed it but it didn't kick a new pipeline,
I've ran

./x.py test tidy --bless

locally, everything seems fine

./x.py check

also looks fine locally

[Dylan-DPC]

@bors try

[b-ncMN]

Bors didn't respond

[oli-obk]

@bors r+ rollup

Thanks!

[bors]

📌 Commit 645620b has been approved by oli-obk

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 645620b with merge 09be68c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing 09be68c to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (09be68c): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 2 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression