Further elaborate the lack of guarantees from Hasher
#96828
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
rustbot
added
the
T-libs
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 83f785b has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#96617 (Fix incorrect syntax suggestion with `pub async fn`) - rust-lang#96828 (Further elaborate the lack of guarantees from `Hasher`) - rust-lang#96829 (Fix the `x.py clippy` command) - rust-lang#96830 (Add and tweak const-generics tests) - rust-lang#96835 (Add more eslint rules) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I realized that I got too excited in #94598 by adding new methods, and forgot to do the documentation to really answer the core question in #94026.
This PR just has that doc update.
r? @Amanieu