Skip to content

Fix rustc-perf benchmarks #97044

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2022
Merged

Fix rustc-perf benchmarks #97044

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions src/bootstrap/builder.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1154,9 +1154,13 @@ impl<'a> Builder<'a> {
// backtrace, core_simd, std_float, ...), those dependencies have their own features
// but cargo isn't involved in the #[path] and so cannot pass the complete list of
// features, so for that reason we don't enable checking of features for std.
if mode != Mode::Std {
cargo.arg("-Zcheck-cfg-features");
}
//
// FIXME: Re-enable this after the beta bump as apperently rustc-perf doesn't use the
// beta cargo. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96984#issuecomment-1126678773
// #[cfg(not(bootstrap))]
// if mode != Mode::Std {
// cargo.arg("-Zcheck-cfg-features"); // -Zcheck-cfg=features after bump
// }

// Enable cfg checking of well known names/values
rustflags
Expand Down