Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to specify output directory for generated interpreters #36630

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

tobiasdiez
Copy link
Contributor

Add the possibility to specify the output directory where the generated interpreters files will be created. This is preparation for the compilation with meson.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit a191861; changes) is ready! 🎉

@orlitzky
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is OK now, thanks.

@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the review and the good suggestions!

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
…erpreters

    
<!-- ^^^^^
Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title.
Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below.
For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#1234" use "Introduce new method to
calculate 1+1"
-->
<!-- Describe your changes here in detail -->

Add the possibility to specify the output directory where the generated
interpreters files will be created. This is preparation for the
compilation with meson.

<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For
example "Fixes sagemath#12345". -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately. -->

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately -->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
<!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. -->

- [ ] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
- [ ] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on
- sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency
- sagemath#34567: ...
-->

<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
    
URL: sagemath#36630
Reported by: Tobias Diez
Reviewer(s): Matthias Köppe, Michael Orlitzky, Tobias Diez
@vbraun vbraun merged commit 3a9254d into sagemath:develop Dec 6, 2023
19 checks passed
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.3 milestone Dec 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants