Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hide more chronic diff on CI #39542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

user202729
Copy link
Contributor

@user202729 user202729 commented Feb 18, 2025

When you click on the "changes is ready!" button posted by github-actions, sometimes when a new code block is added/removed, a lot of irrelevant diff is shown. This pull request fixes it.

Note: looks like the diff is against the last release, so we can't test this until after the next release. But the change looks simple enough that it can't have any bug… right.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

⌛ Dependencies

Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 5e6c51e; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@fchapoton fchapoton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will trust you on the matter

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2025
    
When you click on the "changes is ready!" button posted by github-
actions, sometimes when a new code block is added/removed, a lot of
irrelevant diff is shown. This pull request fixes it.

Note: looks like the diff is against the last release, so we can't test
this until after the next release. But the change looks simple enough
that it can't have any bug… right.

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->

- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example,
-->
<!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency -->
<!-- - sagemath#34567: ... -->
    
URL: sagemath#39542
Reported by: user202729
Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
    
When you click on the "changes is ready!" button posted by github-
actions, sometimes when a new code block is added/removed, a lot of
irrelevant diff is shown. This pull request fixes it.

Note: looks like the diff is against the last release, so we can't test
this until after the next release. But the change looks simple enough
that it can't have any bug… right.

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->

- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example,
-->
<!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency -->
<!-- - sagemath#34567: ... -->
    
URL: sagemath#39542
Reported by: user202729
Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
@vbraun vbraun merged commit 753b289 into sagemath:develop Feb 28, 2025
21 of 23 checks passed
@user202729
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: looks like the diff is against the last release, so we can't test this until after the next release.

Very bad news: the diff baseline is not updated, and now the CHANGES.html is massive for the obvious reason.

The code is duplicated so…

image

Time to refactor the thing to avoid code duplication.

@user202729 user202729 mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2025
5 tasks
@user202729
Copy link
Contributor Author

Follow-up in #39622 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants