Use libstdc++.so.6.0.9 to workaround static init problems

[saper]

libsass needs to be linked against libc++ from clang
on MacOSX to use advanced C++11 functions.

The binding code is not that picky and we can try
to link against whatever is the default.
Mixing C++ runtime libraries is still very bad, but
we should be able to avoid crash when being
used with another node module using nan.h
and its GetWrapper() static cache:

fsevents/fsevents#82

[xzyfer]

IIRC this would ideally be superseded by nodejs/nan#431?

[saper]

@xzyfer can you check if this compiles, and if it does, does it crash with stock nan 2.0.7 (without nodejs/nan#431 applied)

[xzyfer]

This appears to work @saper

[saper]

Yay! :happy:

[xzyfer]

Do you have objections to the nan patch? Doesn't look like we can avoid it
On 28 Aug 2015 09:54, "Marcin Cieślak" notifications@github.com wrote:

Yay! :happy:

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1110 (comment).

[saper]

As to relation to nodejs/nan#431: nan use of static revealed an incompatibility between C++ libraries or a linker/compiler bug. This can be to a large extent avoided by this patch here. There is a possibility that some other binary component (not necessarily nan) introduces a feature that breaks again, so we should stay on a safe side.

[xzyfer]

I'm happy for you to ship this. I'm for about 16hrs. Feel free to merge and
start building freebsd binaries.
On 28 Aug 2015 18:49, "Marcin Cieślak" notifications@github.com wrote:

As to relation to nodejs/nan#431 nodejs/nan#431:
nan use of static revealed an incompatibility between C++ libraries or a
linker/compiler bug. This can be to a large extent avoided by this patch
here. There is a possibility that some other binary component (not
necessarily nan) introduces a feature that breaks again, so we should stay
on a safe side.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1110 (comment).

[saper]

So we are about to get 3.3.2 soon :)

[saper]

@xzyfer would be cool if you were able to check 60e0b25, er saper@d178927 (without nan patch) if it fixes the issue. We should probably get MacOSX CI :)

[xzyfer]

We've tried to get OSX CI but we were denied by the Travis team. I'll chase them up again.