-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 816
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Foundry v2 #489
Foundry v2 #489
Conversation
I was trying to verify on https://mumbai.polygonscan.com/address/0x4FaE2E1Dd219400328edAC56B3bc9F81bD6EE190 Also for some reason it's not verified yet It just say you "submitted verification" and end the script there, I think we should probably wait for contract verification and once we get a response from etherscan then output the message with verified etherscan URL 😅 I don't how would be able to make network request / wait for a network request if it's at all possible similar to se-2 hardhat |
Yes, error logging is a TODO here. we can either run some checks after the script is done or while the script is running. |
Tysm @jrcarlos2000, I have been testing it a bit it seems work 🙌 But for some reason, I get this : As you can see logged the ERROR but the it was verified at the end Also if there was error like I used I wonder if we could parse this nicely and show it on terminal ? Like Maybe just showing Also, it would be really great if we don't show "== Logs ==" if the thing failed 🙌 Also, I thinki there are warning like unsued But Thanks again !! The functionality works nicely lets clean it up a bit 🙌 !! |
Tysm @jrcarlos2000, Just a few things : 1 . When we try to deploy intially we get warnings from 2 . I think we should log the etherscan URL for verified contract or at least the ☝️ We don't see any When I was testing the verification of multiple contracts, it worked and also logged that one contract was already verified (since etherscan already found similar contract and verified it) I like this logging !!, Would be really helpful if we also do something like this for point 2. 3 . If the user has put invalid etherscan api key : We get this :( , Which is hard to debug. I think we should make it a lil verbose 🙌 |
cc: @technophile-04 |
Hey Tysm @jrcarlos2000 !! Looking really great now !! I tested it with a few different networks and working great! Just a small case that i noticed while testing is,For some reason this only happens only on
Instead of "Missing or invalid ApiKey" Also, this problem is just with Nevertheless if it gets very hard to debug / require a very big change we can merge this and iterate over this issue on other PR, Because I think this PR already is looking alot better now & for chains like |
Merging this 🙌, Regarding Tysm Carlos !!! |
Description
yarn deploy:verify
Additional Information
Related Issues
_Closes #470
Your ENS/address: jrcarlos2000.eth