Skip to content

Implicits tour draft #1019

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

siddhartha-gadgil
Copy link

I have attempted to address the reviewers comments, including

some rewriting,
a section on implicit classes,
new examples.
I have also added a section with a very basic case of typeclasses.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

@siddhartha-gadgil glad you found your way to this repo. a lot has changed here since @travissarles did his work, the whole site was redone. it looks like you inadvertently pulled in some changes that are unrelated to your edits.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

also you'll probably want to wait for #1018 to be merged. I think multiple people have been working on this part of the tour, and it seems certain now that #1018 will be merged first.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

#1018 is merged now, but this might also overlap with #1003

@SethTisue SethTisue added the wip label Feb 15, 2018
@siddhartha-gadgil
Copy link
Author

siddhartha-gadgil commented Feb 16, 2018 via email

@siddhartha-gadgil
Copy link
Author

Seems redundant given rewriting that is already merged.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

sorry about what turned out to be redundant efforts — thanks for taking the time on it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants