Use package name as basename for Thor classes

[zzaakiirr]

What does this PR do?

This PR:

1. Fixes Thor.basename so it prefers @package_name over basename of $PROGRAM_NAME
2. Moves monkey patches for Thor class to separate file

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced message formatting capabilities through a new print_wrapped method in the Thor class.
  • Improved flexibility of the basename method in the Thor class for better context utilization.

• Bug Fixes

  • Resolved issues with the basename method to ensure it correctly returns the package name or default program name.

• Tests

  • Added comprehensive tests for the .basename method to validate its behavior in different scenarios.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve a significant refactoring of the Cpflow module, specifically the removal of the Thor class and its nested functionality from lib/cpflow.rb. This shift enhances modularization by offloading message formatting to a new file, lib/patches/thor.rb, which reintroduces a print_wrapped method and modifies the basename method for improved flexibility. New tests have been added to ensure the robustness of these changes.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
lib/cpflow.rb	Removed Thor, Shell::Basic, and print_wrapped method; introduced require_relative for modular message handling.
lib/patches/thor.rb	Added print_wrapped method in Shell::Basic; modified basename method in Thor for enhanced functionality.
spec/patches/thor_spec.rb	New tests for Thor class focusing on .basename method behavior under different scenarios.

Poem

In a world of code, so neat and bright,
A rabbit hops, bringing changes to light.
From Thor we’ve leapt, to patches anew,
With messages wrapped, and tests that are true.
Hooray for the shifts, in our coding den,
Let's celebrate progress, again and again! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[zzaakiirr]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)

lib/patches/thor.rb (1)

23-25: No assignment for @package_name found.

The variable @package_name is used in the basename method but is not assigned anywhere in the codebase. This could lead to potential issues when the method is called.

• lib/patches/thor.rb: @package_name is used without being assigned.

Analysis chain

Verify @package_name assignment.

Ensure that @package_name is correctly assigned elsewhere in the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the assignment of `@package_name`.

# Test: Search for the assignment of `@package_name`. Expect: Correct assignment.
rg --type ruby '@package_name'

Length of output: 77

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82ff517 and 9e6d6b4.

Files selected for processing (3)

• lib/cpflow.rb (1 hunks)
• lib/patches/thor.rb (1 hunks)
• spec/patches/thor_spec.rb (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (4)

lib/patches/thor.rb (1)

8-18: Verify stdout definition and handle edge cases.

Ensure that stdout is correctly defined and consider handling edge cases, such as empty messages.

spec/patches/thor_spec.rb (2)

10-20: LGTM!

The test case correctly checks if the basename method returns the package name when it is defined.

---

22-28: LGTM!

The test case correctly checks if the basename method returns the basename of the program invoking the class when the package name is not defined.

lib/cpflow.rb (1)

34-34: LGTM!

The addition of require_relative "patches/thor" is necessary for the refactoring.