Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement device selector for 'physical' #8173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

smira
Copy link
Member

@smira smira commented Jan 18, 2024

Closes #8090

@smira smira added this to the v1.7 milestone Jan 18, 2024
@smira smira force-pushed the feat/physical-device-selector branch from e1803bc to 0affc9b Compare January 18, 2024 17:28
[notes.device_selectors]
title = "Device Selectors"
description = """\
Talos now supports `physical: true` qualifier for device selectors.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably needs to be more clear what physcial is, like physically attached NIC's

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, I will clarify this, thanks

Copy link
Member

@frezbo frezbo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if the word physical makes sense exactly, but I don't have any better suggestions too

Closes siderolabs#8090

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrey.smirnov@siderolabs.com>
@smira smira force-pushed the feat/physical-device-selector branch from 0affc9b to d677901 Compare January 23, 2024 11:06
@smira
Copy link
Member Author

smira commented Jan 23, 2024

/m

@talos-bot talos-bot merged commit d677901 into siderolabs:main Jan 23, 2024
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants