-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FormatterType Support SF3 #146
FormatterType Support SF3 #146
Conversation
dad649a
to
d812edd
Compare
LGTM |
And the commit adds tests… great work! |
{ | ||
parent::tearDown(); | ||
|
||
$this->extension = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO, we don't need this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
5969e51
to
e04575b
Compare
I've upgraded this PR with master because the Travis CI was failing but the upgrade doesn't fix the Test. Thank to the failed test I guess have detected a issue about versions of egeloen/ckeditor-bundle from the last merge #110 . Too In my project i can see:
The service ivory_ck_editor.templating.helper was renamed in version 2.4 but composer.json is allowing version 2.2 You can check it from this commit To fix it and the test too simply need change composer.json to
maybe this change would be in a new PR or Issue? |
I think it would. Can you do it? @Th3Mouk can you comment on this? |
The firt version of egeloen/ckeditor-bundle with support for symfony/form:~3.0 is 4.0 I guess we can support sf3 with something like this |
I've started to develop the upgrade in october and there's not 4.x releases, i agree that the composer.json must be upgrade from Il will make the upgrade of composer. The ^4.0 upgrade seems really simple, @dnoise would you do the PR ? |
I've check it's ok for 4.x support there no BC, i've made PR to #148 |
can we merge this @Th3Mouk ? |
@OskarStark I can't pronounce on the testing part, that must be extract on a base class apparently. @rafaelcalleja could you rebase please ? Tests are red actually |
Could you please rebase your PR and fix merge conflicts? |
According to the new Sonata version management and next major release plan, this project has been refactored regarding branching and versioning. If you see this message, your PR concerns a patch or a minor release and is not targeting the right branch. So I'm closing this one, but don't see it as a refusal. If you think your work is still relevant and want to continue, feel free to reopen it on the right branch (e.g. the default one). Regards. |
add to #145 sonata_formatter_type support in SF3