Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schema update for BGP internal neighbor table #389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2020

Conversation

judyjoseph
Copy link
Collaborator

Add a new BGP_INTERNAL_NEIGHBOR table in the DB schema.

This table will contain the internal BGP sessions created between BGP instances running per ASIC namespace in a multi-asic platform.

@judyjoseph judyjoseph marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2020 15:54
@judyjoseph judyjoseph merged commit 165a679 into sonic-net:master Oct 23, 2020
@judyjoseph judyjoseph deleted the bgp_internal_neighbor branch October 23, 2020 04:47
abdosi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2020
Add a new BGP_INTERNAL_NEIGHBOR table in the DB schema.
This table will contain the internal BGP sessions created between BGP instances running per ASIC namespace in a multi-asic platform.
StormLiangMS pushed a commit to StormLiangMS/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2022
Reintroduce the msft templates for multi-asic(3164) after the following sonic public PR's ( for internal BGP neighbors) are available in internal-201911 branch.

sonic-net#5520
sonic-net#5760
sonic-net/sonic-swss-common#389
sonic-net/sonic-utilities#1224

How did I verify
-----------------
1. Verified the external and internal BGP sessions are up, shown correctly in "show ip bgp summary -d all" and show ip interface commands.

2. Ran related 3164 tests to make sure it is passing.

bgp/test_bgp_fact.py::test_bgp_facts[0-0] PASSED                                                                                                           [ 16%]
bgp/test_bgp_fact.py::test_bgp_facts[0-1] PASSED                                                                                                                [ 33%]
bgp/test_bgp_fact.py::test_bgp_facts[0-2] PASSED                                                                                                                [ 50%]
bgp/test_bgp_fact.py::test_bgp_facts[0-3] PASSED                                                                                                                [ 66%]
bgp/test_bgp_fact.py::test_bgp_facts[0-4] PASSED                                                                                                                [ 83%]
bgp/test_bgp_fact.py::test_bgp_facts[0-5] PASSED                                                                                                                [100%]
bgp/test_bgp_multipath_relax.py::test_bgp_multipath_relax[0] PASSED                                                                                             [ 57%]
bgp/test_bgp_multipath_relax.py::test_bgp_multipath_relax[1] PASSED                                                                                             [ 63%]
bgp/test_bgp_multipath_relax.py::test_bgp_multipath_relax[2] SKIPPED                                                                                            [ 68%]
bgp/test_bgp_multipath_relax.py::test_bgp_multipath_relax[3] SKIPPED                                                                                            [ 73%]
bgp/test_bgp_multipath_relax.py::test_bgp_multipath_relax[4] SKIPPED                                                                                            [ 78%]
bgp/test_bgp_multipath_relax.py::test_bgp_multipath_relax[5] SKIPPED                                                                                            [ 84%]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants