-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 547
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add speed and buffer set test #432
Add speed and buffer set test #432
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz <c_andriym@mellanox.com>
tests/test_speed.py
Outdated
|
||
buffer_profiles = cfg_buffer_profile_table.getKeys() | ||
expected_buffer_profiles_num = len(buffer_profiles) | ||
assert expected_buffer_profiles_num == 7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using number 7 here seems to be a recipe for long investigation when test fails. How can we make it clearer where this number came from and when test failed here, what to look for?
A comment will be a good start.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it comes from the buffers profile used for the test
I think it can be calculates (something like cat ... | grep "PROFILE" | wc -l
)
I'll check and update this comment
fvs = swsscommon.FieldValuePairs([("speed", speed)]) | ||
# set same speed on all ports | ||
for i in range(0, self.num_ports): | ||
cfg_port_table.set("Ethernet%d" % (i*4), fvs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect this change won't work for all devices.
It all depends on what is self.num_ports?
For instance, Arista7260CX3 has 64 physical ports, if self.num_ports is 64 for this device, then it is fine. However, when Arista7260CX3 is used for T0, it will have 56 out of 64 ports break into 2 50G ports, bring the total number of ports to 112 + 8 = 120. Most of these ports are Etherenet(x * 4) and Ethernet(x * 4 + 2) except the 8 100G ports. So if self.num_ports is 120 for this device, then the code here is incorrect.
Also, it appears that ASIC_STATE:SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_PORT also contains disabled ports. E.g. on the platform mentioned above, the number of entry is actually 123 (120 valid ports, 2 disabled ports, 1 cpu).
On the same mentioned platform, the asic port sequence doesn't directly map into Ethernet sequence. This is another assumption that would break, unfortunately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is designed to run on PLATFORM=vs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Can you at least add a comment at beginning of this file?
Thanks,
Ying
the test does not pass, please check |
It will pass after VS docker is updated sonic-net/sonic-buildimage@ff8332f (it is part of buffers config PR sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#1250) |
Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz <c_andriym@mellanox.com>
* Add speed and buffer set test Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz <c_andriym@mellanox.com> * Add some comments to the test Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz <c_andriym@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Andriy Moroz c_andriym@mellanox.com
What I did
Added test for port speed change and PG buffer profile update
Why I did it
How I verified it
Ran the test and checked it passes
Details if related
should pass after
#417 and
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#1250
are merged