Skip to content

Relicense to dual MIT/Apache-2.0 #25

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2016
Merged

Conversation

emberian
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was automatically generated because my scripts detected that
everyone in the relicensing issue agreed to
relicensing.

License headers in files were not updated, if they exist. I've reproduced an
example license header below if you want to copy-paste it in. If you don't
have license headers, don't feel compelled to add
them
.

// Copyright 2016 spaceapi-server-rs Developers
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license <LICENSE-MIT or
// http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option. This file may not be
// copied, modified, or distributed except according to those terms.

I recommend publishing a new patch version (the z in x.y.z) so that the
metadata propagates to crates.io.

Please be sure to check the README.md for style. I've try to
review these PRs as they go out, but I might miss something.

Thanks for relicensing!

(For my bookkeeping: this is repository id spaceapi-server-rs-e06ec2ec-6fa4-4878-9a75-0f9fbfce1b84)

incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.

END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The part following this can probably removed from the license itself, right?

@dbrgn
Copy link
Collaborator

dbrgn commented Jan 13, 2016

Also, LICENSE.txt should probably be removed.

Regarding the license headers in code files, I don't really like them. What about adding one to the main entry point (lib.rs)? Would that suffice?

@emberian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dbrgn License headers are not required (rust-lang/rust#21481 (comment))

@emberian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that if you do add them, adding them to only one file doesn't make sense.

@dbrgn
Copy link
Collaborator

dbrgn commented Jan 14, 2016

Thanks, @cmr. Cool initiative!

dbrgn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2016
Relicense to dual MIT/Apache-2.0
@dbrgn dbrgn merged commit 67b4cfa into spaceapi-community:master Jan 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants