ENH: Add NGFF 0.4 JSON Schema validation test

[thewtex]

No description provided.

[thewtex]

Based on the work of @sbesson 🙏

[sbesson]

Thanks for the heads up @thewtex. With ome/ngff#113 now merged, https://ngff.openmicroscopy.org/0.4/schemas/image.schema and other schemas should now start resolving and I assume the downstream packages can start consuming these.

As mentioned in ome/ngff#58, there are a few scalability and usability downsides with dynamically retrieving remote schemas for eac validation. I suspect there will be a use case for distributing these schemas as library resources but we have not yet established the best language-agnostic way to structure this.

[sbesson]

Thanks for the heads up @thewtex. With ome/ngff#113 now merged, https://ngff.openmicroscopy.org/0.4/schemas/image.schema and other schemas should now start resolving and I assume the downstream packages can start consuming these.

As mentioned in ome/ngff#58, there are a few scalability and usability downsides with dynamically retrieving remote schemas for eac validation. I suspect there will be a use case for distributing these schemas as library resources but we have not yet established the best language-agnostic way to structure this.

[thewtex]

Thanks for the heads up @thewtex. With ome/ngff#113 now merged, https://ngff.openmicroscopy.org/0.4/schemas/image.schema and other schemas should now start resolving and I assume the downstream packages can start consuming these.

@sbesson wonderful, thank you!

Migrating to this in #27

As mentioned in ome/ngff#58, there are a few scalability and usability downsides with dynamically retrieving remote schemas for eac validation. I suspect there will be a use case for distributing these schemas as library resources but we have not yet established the best language-agnostic way to structure this.

Yes, packages that could be used offilne would be nice.