-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 493
[1.4.12] Private repository with port number not valid anymore #308
Comments
…it number to represent a proper port definition.
only 80 port! |
@buhuan192 Can you tell us why? |
I don't get it. |
@buhuan192 bullshit, this would mean no ssl/tls... @mmaeller I think @SkySonR just wanted to point out the relevant changes which cause this issue. I completely agree, that this is a must have as most companies I work with also use custom private repositories which might be hosted on the same hostname but different ports. |
We're seeing the exact same issue, can't use a private repository with a custom port (which, as said above, is a very common use-case). |
@mmaeller has got a good fix to this in his branch with a PR pending. |
|
This bug have appeared in v1.4.11 and still happening in v1.4.12 |
Any idea when the pull request will get merged? Unable to use this with a private repository on a different port at the moment |
#308 Extend repository validation by allowing port number.
spotify/dockerfile-maven#308 has been resolved, so we can update
Description
Private repository with port in address invalid.
How to reproduce
https://myrepo:5001/project
What do you expect
Port is a valid part of the repository URL.
What happened instead
See c0ce28f
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: