Merge branch 'verify-callbacks-as-if-they-are-called-unknown-number-o…

…f-times'

Eduard Zingerman says:

====================
verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times

This series updates verifier logic for callback functions handling.
Current master simulates callback body execution exactly once,
which leads to verifier not detecting unsafe programs like below:

    static int unsafe_on_zero_iter_cb(__u32 idx, struct num_context *ctx)
    {
        ctx->i = 0;
        return 0;
    }

    SEC("?raw_tp")
    int unsafe_on_zero_iter(void *unused)
    {
        struct num_context loop_ctx = { .i = 32 };
        __u8 choice_arr[2] = { 0, 1 };

        bpf_loop(100, unsafe_on_zero_iter_cb, &loop_ctx, 0);
        return choice_arr[loop_ctx.i];
    }

This was reported previously in [0].
The basic idea of the fix is to schedule callback entry state for
verification in env->head until some identical, previously visited
state in current DFS state traversal is found. Same logic as with open
coded iterators, and builds on top recent fixes [1] for those.

The series is structured as follows:
- patches #1,2,3 update strobemeta, xdp_synproxy selftests and
  bpf_loop_bench benchmark to allow convergence of the bpf_loop
  callback states;
- patches #4,5 just shuffle the code a bit;
- patch #6 is the main part of the series;
- patch #7 adds test cases for #6;
- patch #8 extend patch #6 with same speculative scalar widening
  logic, as used for open coded iterators;
- patch #9 adds test cases for #8;
- patch #10 extends patch #6 to track maximal number of callback
  executions specifically for bpf_loop();
- patch #11 adds test cases for #10.

Veristat results comparing this series to master+patches #1,2,3 using selftests
show the following difference:

File                       Program        States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF)
-------------------------  -------------  ----------  ----------  -------------
bpf_loop_bench.bpf.o       benchmark               1           2  +1 (+100.00%)
pyperf600_bpf_loop.bpf.o   on_event              322         407  +85 (+26.40%)
strobemeta_bpf_loop.bpf.o  on_event              113         151  +38 (+33.63%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.o    syncookie_tc          341         291  -50 (-14.66%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.o    syncookie_xdp         344         301  -43 (-12.50%)

Veristat results comparing this series to master using Tetragon BPF
files [2] also show some differences.
States diff varies from +2% to +15% on 23 programs out of 186,
no new failures.

Changelog:
- V3 [5] -> V4, changes suggested by Andrii:
  - validate mark_chain_precision() result in patch #10;
  - renaming s/cumulative_callback_depth/callback_unroll_depth/.
- V2 [4] -> V3:
  - fixes in expected log messages for test cases:
    - callback_result_precise;
    - parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback;
    - parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback;
  - renamings (suggested by Alexei):
    - s/callback_iter_depth/cumulative_callback_depth/
    - s/is_callback_iter_next/calls_callback/
    - s/mark_callback_iter_next/mark_calls_callback/
  - prepare_func_exit() updated to exit with -EFAULT when
    callee->in_callback_fn is true but calls_callback() is not true
    for callsite;
  - test case 'bpf_loop_iter_limit_nested' rewritten to use return
    value check instead of verifier log message checks
    (suggested by Alexei).
- V1 [3] -> V2, changes suggested by Andrii:
  - small changes for error handling code in __check_func_call();
  - callback body processing log is now matched in relevant
    verifier_subprog_precision.c tests;
  - R1 passed to bpf_loop() is now always marked as precise;
  - log level 2 message for bpf_loop() iteration termination instead of
    iteration depth messages;
  - __no_msg macro removed;
  - bpf_loop_iter_limit_nested updated to avoid using __no_msg;
  - commit message for patch #3 updated according to Alexei's request.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+vRuzPChFNXmouzGG+wsy=6eMcfr1mFG0F3g7rbg-sedGKW3w@mail.gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231024000917.12153-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] git@github.com:cilium/tetragon.git
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231116021803.9982-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/T/#t
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231118013355.7943-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/T/#t
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231120225945.11741-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/T/#t
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

include/linux/bpf_verifier.h

@@ -301,6 +301,17 @@ struct bpf_func_state {
 	struct tnum callback_ret_range;
 	bool in_async_callback_fn;
 	bool in_exception_callback_fn;
+	/* For callback calling functions that limit number of possible
+	 * callback executions (e.g. bpf_loop) keeps track of current
+	 * simulated iteration number.
+	 * Value in frame N refers to number of times callback with frame
+	 * N+1 was simulated, e.g. for the following call:
+	 *
+	 *   bpf_loop(..., fn, ...); | suppose current frame is N
+	 *                           | fn would be simulated in frame N+1
+	 *                           | number of simulations is tracked in frame N
+	 */
+	u32 callback_depth;
 
 	/* The following fields should be last. See copy_func_state() */
 	int acquired_refs;
@@ -400,6 +411,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state {
 	struct bpf_idx_pair *jmp_history;
 	u32 jmp_history_cnt;
 	u32 dfs_depth;
+	u32 callback_unroll_depth;
 };
 
 #define bpf_get_spilled_reg(slot, frame, mask)				\
@@ -511,6 +523,10 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
 	 * this instruction, regardless of any heuristics
 	 */
 	bool force_checkpoint;
+	/* true if instruction is a call to a helper function that
+	 * accepts callback function as a parameter.
+	 */
+	bool calls_callback;
 };
 
 #define MAX_USED_MAPS 64 /* max number of maps accessed by one eBPF program */