Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/add reusable forge code coverage #72

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

AndyBoWu
Copy link

No description provided.

* refactor Governance into AccessManager
* remove view method in script
@AndyBoWu AndyBoWu force-pushed the feat/add_reusable_forge_code_coverage branch 5 times, most recently from 9d0127f to 889c94a Compare April 11, 2024 22:53
@AndyBoWu AndyBoWu force-pushed the feat/add_reusable_forge_code_coverage branch 2 times, most recently from 6e55976 to e214168 Compare April 11, 2024 23:05
@AndyBoWu AndyBoWu force-pushed the feat/add_reusable_forge_code_coverage branch from e214168 to d3166d7 Compare April 11, 2024 23:07
@LeoHChen LeoHChen merged commit 5d91e7a into main Apr 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@LeoHChen LeoHChen deleted the feat/add_reusable_forge_code_coverage branch April 12, 2024 01:02
Spablob pushed a commit to Spablob/protocol-core-v1 that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2024
* Refactor Governance into AccessManager (storyprotocol#43)

* refactor Governance into AccessManager
* remove view method in script

* [feat] add reusable forge code coverage workflow

---------

Co-authored-by: Ramarti <raul.mf86@gmail.com>
jdubpark pushed a commit to jdubpark/sp-protocol-core that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
* Refactor Governance into AccessManager (storyprotocol#43)

* refactor Governance into AccessManager
* remove view method in script

* [feat] add reusable forge code coverage workflow

---------

Co-authored-by: Ramarti <raul.mf86@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants