Add make e2e command for e2e tests based on skywalking-e2e-infra

[tpiperatgod]

(If this PR fixes a github issue, please add Fixes #<xyz>.)

Fixes #

(or if this PR is one task of a github issue, please add Master Issue: #<xyz> to link to the master issue.)

Master Issue: #401 #314

Motivation

Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modifications

• add make e2e command for e2e tests based on skywalking-e2e-infra

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Documentation

Check the box below.

Need to update docs?

• doc-required

  (If you need help on updating docs, create a doc issue)

• no-need-doc

  (Please explain why)

• doc

  (If this PR contains doc changes)

[tpiperatgod]

Currently we can't use skywalking-e2e-infra for github action directly, mainly because of the resource limitation of github action itself.

So I have temporarily integrated this e2e testing framework into the make e2e command, which has the advantage that we can reduce the usage of github action and make it easier for us to verify the functionality locally.

There are test cases in the .ci/tests/integration/cases directory, currently there is only one java-function test case, you can refer to it to add new test cases.

I think we can wait for #420 to be reviewed and merged before reviewing the PR, because some of the improvements in #420 also help the PR

[tpiperatgod]

I think this PR is ready.

[freeznet]

left some comments, PTAL, thanks.

[freeznet]

@jiangpengcheng @danpi @nlu90 need an eye on this one, thanks.

[jiangpengcheng]

is this still not working in Github Action?

[tpiperatgod]

is this still not working in Github Action?

Yes, because of resource limitations (CPU, memory, disk etc.).

[tpiperatgod]

There is a way to bypass the resource limitations by removing the .resources, and I thought we could try this.

[tpiperatgod]

There is a way to bypass the resource limitations by removing the .resources, and I thought we could try this.

It works 🙃