[5.9🍒] without operator using ~ for implicit conformance suppression
#1560
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
- changes "hasWithout" to "withoutTilde" for now, though the tilde is likely to change to the contextual keyword `without` soon. - improves a test with structural verification - simplifies parsing a bit
This basically moves the logic out from only when encountering an inheritance entry and instead when generally parsing a type, since that was a better way to go on the C++ side. (cherry picked from commit d141df5)
kavon
force-pushed
the
5.9-without-operator
branch
from
933affc to
e73459b
Compare
Member
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
This resultet in a parser nesting error (cherry picked from commit eaf980d)
Member
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
Member
Author
|
@swift-ci please test windows |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
cherry-pick of: