hotfix: apply new like API #58
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@seoulyego has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. β How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. π¦ How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to several components related to the liking functionality of products. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
- λ³κ²½λ like APIμ λ§μΆ° μμ νμμ΅λλ€.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 7
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/pages/ReviewPage/ReviewPage.jsx (1)
49-49: Approve the addition of like functionality and suggest prop name improvementThe addition of the
likeContentprop toReviewFloatButtonaligns with the PR objectives for applying the new like API. This change appropriately passes theisLikedstatus to the button component.Consider renaming the
likeContentprop to something more descriptive of its boolean nature, such asisLikedorisReviewLiked. This would make the prop's purpose clearer:<ReviewFloatButton userData={client} productId={review.id} - likeContent={review.isLiked} + isLiked={review.isLiked} />src/pages/ReviewPage/ReviewFloatButton.jsx (1)
12-16: LGTM! Consider using object destructuring for default values.The addition of the
likeContentprop aligns well with the PR objective. The default value ensures backward compatibility, which is a good practice.For consistency with modern JavaScript practices, consider using object destructuring with default values:
-export default function ReviewFloatButton({ - userData, - productId, - likeContent = false, -}) { +export default function ReviewFloatButton({ + userData, + productId, + likeContent = false +}) {This change makes the default value assignment more explicit and consistent with the rest of the codebase.
src/hooks/useProductLike.js (1)
Line range hint
11-11: Remove commented-outalertstatements in error handlingThe
alertstatements in thecatchblocks of bothlikeProductandunlikeProductfunctions are commented out. If these alerts are no longer needed, consider removing them to keep the code clean. If you need to notify the user of errors, consider implementing an appropriate user feedback mechanism.Also applies to: 20-20
π Comments failed to post (7)
src/pages/ReviewPage/ReviewFloatButton.jsx (1)
60-60:
β οΈ Potential issueResolve inconsistency between PropTypes and function signature.
The PropTypes definition for
likeContentis set as required, which conflicts with the default value provided in the function signature.To resolve this, choose one of the following options:
- If
likeContentshould be optional:- likeContent: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, + likeContent: PropTypes.bool,
- If
likeContentshould be required:-export default function ReviewFloatButton({ - userData, - productId, - likeContent = false, -}) { +export default function ReviewFloatButton({ + userData, + productId, + likeContent, +}) {Please clarify the intended behavior and make the appropriate change.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/hooks/useProductLike.js (1)
4-4:
β οΈ Potential issueAdd validation for
productIdparameterEnsure that
productIdis a valid and defined value before using it in API requests. This can prevent potential runtime errors or unintended API calls with an invalidproductId.Consider adding the following validation at the beginning of the hook:
if (!productId) { throw new Error('productId is required') }src/components/Button/PreviewLikeButton.jsx (2)
24-25:
β οΈ Potential issueAdd error handling for
likeProductandunlikeProductAPI callsAfter calling
likeProduct()orunlikeProduct(), theisLikedstate is updated without verifying if the API call was successful. If an API call fails, the UI may display an incorrect like status. Consider adding error handling to manage potential API call failures and provide appropriate feedback to the user.Also applies to: 27-28
11-11:
β οΈ Potential issueResolve inconsistency between default prop value and PropTypes declaration for
likeContentThe
likeContentprop has a default value offalsein the component's arguments, implying it's optional. However, inPropTypes, it is marked asisRequired. To maintain consistency, either remove the default value and enforce thatlikeContentmust be provided, or updatePropTypesto makelikeContentoptional.Also applies to: 49-49
src/pages/ReviewPage/ReviewLikeButton.jsx (3)
19-31:
β οΈ Potential issueAdd Error Handling in
handleLikeFunctionThe
likeProductandunlikeProductfunctions are asynchronous, but any errors they might throw are not being handled. This could result in unhandled promise rejections and affect the user experience if, for example, a network error occurs.Consider wrapping the async operations in
try...catchblocks to handle errors gracefully.Apply this diff to add error handling:
const handleLike = async () => { if (!userData) { popLoginModal() return } + try { if (!isLiked) { await likeProduct() setIsLiked(true) } else { await unlikeProduct() setIsLiked(false) } + } catch (error) { + // Handle error (e.g., display an error message to the user) + console.error(error) + } }π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const handleLike = async () => { if (!userData) { popLoginModal() return } try { if (!isLiked) { await likeProduct() setIsLiked(true) } else { await unlikeProduct() setIsLiked(false) } } catch (error) { // Handle error (e.g., display an error message to the user) console.error(error) } }
13-14:
β οΈ Potential issueInconsistent
likeContentProp DefinitionThe
likeContentprop is assigned a default value offalsein the component definition, but it's also marked asisRequiredin thepropTypes. This contradiction might cause confusion or unexpected behavior. Props with default values generally should not be marked as required.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
ReviewLikeButton.propTypes = { userData: PropTypes.shape({}), productId: PropTypes.number.isRequired, - likeContent: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, + likeContent: PropTypes.bool, }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
13-14: π‘ Codebase verification
Missing
likeContentProp inReviewLikeButtonUsagesThe following instances of
ReviewLikeButtondo not provide the requiredlikeContentprop:
src/pages/ReviewPage/ReviewFloatButton.jsxat line 40Please update these instances to include the
likeContentprop with the appropriate value.π Analysis chain
Verify All Usages of
ReviewLikeButtonProvidelikeContentPropSince
likeContenthas been added as a prop toReviewLikeButtonand is utilized to set the initial state, ensure that all instances whereReviewLikeButtonis used are updated to include thelikeContentprop with the correct value.Run the following script to find all usages of
ReviewLikeButtonand check iflikeContentprop is passed:This script identifies all usages of
ReviewLikeButtonand filters out the ones wherelikeContentis not provided. Review these instances to ensure they are updated accordingly.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of 'ReviewLikeButton' and check for 'likeContent' prop. # Find all JSX files containing 'ReviewLikeButton' fd --type f --extension jsx '.*' | xargs grep -nH 'ReviewLikeButton' # Check if 'likeContent' prop is provided in each usage fd --type f --extension jsx '.*' | xargs grep -nH 'ReviewLikeButton' | grep -v 'likeContent'Length of output: 819
π μ°κ΄λ μ΄μ
hotifx
π μμ λ΄μ©
π³ μμ λΈλμΉλͺ
hotfix
πΈ μ€ν¬λ¦°μ· (μ ν)
π¬ 리뷰 μꡬμ¬ν (μ ν)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PreviewLikeButtonandReviewLikeButtoncomponents to manage like state locally, improving user interaction.likeContentprop to several components, ensuring accurate representation of product like status.Bug Fixes
Documentation