Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Sort Priorities when **Default Input** is Empty #100

Closed
FelipeRearden opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@FelipeRearden
Copy link

FelipeRearden commented Aug 31, 2022

Hello @tadashi-aikawa !!!!!

Let em try to explain my FR ...

I noted that when AQS modal is triggered by Custom Command that has an empty Default Input the Priorities rules is not been applied to the AQS modal

Real Example

Example A: This is my Custom Search without an empty Default Input

📸 Setting
image

📸 AQS Modal
image

Result 100% working perfect
5A - 5B - 5C - 5D - 5E - 5F - 5G


Example A: This is my Custom Search with an empty Default Input

📸 Setting
image

📸 AQS Modal
image

Result The Priority is not been applied to the AQS Modal

5G - 5A - 5F - 5E - 5D - 5B - 5C


Maybe I am missing some setting, but would be amazing if we could apply the Priority to the AQS modal when the default input is empty :)

I think this FR have some relation to #81


Thanks for reading this !!!!! I hope you like my suggestion 🙏 🙏 🙏

Let me know if you need more information !!!

Have a great day 🌞

@tadashi-aikawa
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your FR, @FelipeRearden :)

I'll implement it in v7.0.0.

@FelipeRearden
Copy link
Author

I'll implement it in v7.0.0.

Thank you very much @tadashi-aikawa !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@tadashi-aikawa
Copy link
Owner

@FelipeRearden
Released in 7.0.0-beta1 🚀

@tadashi-aikawa
Copy link
Owner

Released in v7.0.0 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants