Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure required PVC is created in reconciler test 👶 #1482

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2019

Conversation

bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

When I was working on #1417 (which added the ability to create PVCs for
the Volume Resource and has since been abandoned) I was surprised to
realize that the reconciler test for the PipelineRun controller doesn't
verify that the PVC has been created. It does make sure its attached and
this is covered by the end to end tests that wouldn't work without it,
but I thought it made sense to test here too since we can.

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

When I was working on tektoncd#1417 (which added the ability to create PVCs for
the Volume Resource and has since been abandoned) I was surprised to
realize that the reconciler test for the PipelineRun controller doesn't
verify that the PVC has been created. It does make sure its attached and
this is covered by the end to end tests that wouldn't work without it,
but I thought it made sense to test here too since we can.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 25, 2019
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Oct 25, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 28, 2019

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot assigned ghost Oct 28, 2019
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 28, 2019
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 31, 2019
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

1 similar comment
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 3a458d1 into tektoncd:master Oct 31, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants