Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix incorrect logic in output resource handling #1491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2019

Conversation

vincent-pli
Copy link
Member

@vincent-pli vincent-pli commented Oct 29, 2019

The storage handle should place outof the loop which for output resource.
With current code, the mutiple output resrouce will not work, only the first resource could be handle.
Fix issue: #1630

Changes

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Describe any user facing changes here, or delete this block.

Examples of user facing changes:
- API changes
- Bug fixes
- Any changes in behavior

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Oct 29, 2019
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 29, 2019
@dlorenc
Copy link
Contributor

dlorenc commented Oct 29, 2019

I'm amazed no test failed on this change, are there any that test this? Maybe one of #1482 or #1481 would do it?

@vincent-pli
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@vincent-pli
Copy link
Member Author

#1630

The `storage` handle should place outof the loop which for `output resource`
With current code, the mutiple `output resrouce` will not work, only the first `resource` could be handle.`
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2019
@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

But otherwise this is great! Thanks for the fix @vincent-pli 🎉 ❤️

/approve

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 27, 2019
@vincent-pli
Copy link
Member Author

@bobcatfish
Added, thanks

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 28, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bobcatfish, vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [bobcatfish,vdemeester]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 7d367bf into tektoncd:master Nov 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants