Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[DEBUG][CI]travis: modify check patch script #268

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2018
Merged

[DEBUG][CI]travis: modify check patch script #268

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2018

Conversation

xiulipan
Copy link

The checkpatch script seems to be broken with the Travis CI ENV
variable. Use some git parse to generate the commit.

@xiulipan
[DEBUG][CI]travis: modify check patch script
4455ec5 
The checkpatch script seems to be broken with the Travis CI ENV
variable. Use some git parse to generate the commit.

Signed-off-by: Pan Xiuli <xiuli.pan@linux.intel.com>
@xiulipan xiulipan mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2018
Merged
lgirdwood
lgirdwood reviewed Nov 12, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@lgirdwood lgirdwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this still work when PR is behind latest master HEAD ? i.e. not recently rebased on master.

@xiulipan
Copy link
Author

@lgirdwood
Seems to be work. The CI are building an auto merged branch form the Github thus /pull/xxx/merge.
What I check is what is the difference between the base branch and the PR branch.
$SHA_MAIN..$SHA_PR This will be exactly same as what we have seen on the PR web page.

@plbossart plbossart merged commit 1c35bbc into thesofproject:topic/sof-dev Nov 13, 2018
aiChaoSONG pushed a commit to aiChaoSONG/linux that referenced this pull request May 24, 2021
@alex
Merge pull request thesofproject#268 from TheSven73/rust-for-linux-pt…
776af46 
…r-err

rust/error: add helper function to convert a C error pointer to a `Result`
Vamshigopal pushed a commit to Vamshigopal/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2023
@paulmckrcu @gregkh
x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
970862a 
commit 29368e0 upstream.

The call to rcu_cpu_starting() in mtrr_ap_init() is not early enough
in the CPU-hotplug onlining process, which results in lockdep splats
as follows:

=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.9.0+ thesofproject#268 Not tainted
-----------------------------
kernel/kprobes.c:300 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

other info that might help us debug this:

RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/1/0.

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.9.0+ thesofproject#268
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x77/0x97
 __is_insn_slot_addr+0x15d/0x170
 kernel_text_address+0xba/0xe0
 ? get_stack_info+0x22/0xa0
 __kernel_text_address+0x9/0x30
 show_trace_log_lvl+0x17d/0x380
 ? dump_stack+0x77/0x97
 dump_stack+0x77/0x97
 __lock_acquire+0xdf7/0x1bf0
 lock_acquire+0x258/0x3d0
 ? vprintk_emit+0x6d/0x2c0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40
 ? vprintk_emit+0x6d/0x2c0
 vprintk_emit+0x6d/0x2c0
 printk+0x4d/0x69
 start_secondary+0x1c/0x100
 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb8/0xbb

This is avoided by moving the call to rcu_cpu_starting up near
the beginning of the start_secondary() function.  Note that the
raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/160223032121.7002.1269740091547117869.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
wenliangwu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
@borkmann @anakryiko
selftest/bpf: Add various selftests for program limits
d1a783d 
Add various tests to check maximum number of supported programs
being attached:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.185325] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.186826] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  [    1.270123] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.988 MHz
  [    1.272428] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fc932722, max_idle_ns: 440795381586 ns
  [    1.276408] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK              <--- (new test)
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #269     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 18/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230929204121.20305-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
wenliangwu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Test bpf_mprog query API via libbpf and raw syscall
f9b0879 
Add a new test case which performs double query of the bpf_mprog through
libbpf API, but also via raw bpf(2) syscall. This is testing to gather
first the count and then in a subsequent probe the full information with
the program array without clearing passed structs in between.

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.398818] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.999 MHz
  [    1.400263] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd336761, max_idle_ns: 440795243819 ns
  [    1.402734] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  [    1.426639] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.428112] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK            <--- (new test)
  #269     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #270     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 19/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
wenliangwu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Test query on empty mprog and pass revision into attach
685446b 
Add a new test case to query on an empty bpf_mprog and pass the revision
directly into expected_revision for attachment to assert that this does
succeed.

  ./test_progs -t tc_opts
  [    1.406778] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3407.990 MHz
  [    1.408863] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fcaf6eb0, max_idle_ns: 440795321766 ns
  [    1.412419] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
  [    1.428671] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.430260] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  #252     tc_opts_after:OK
  #253     tc_opts_append:OK
  #254     tc_opts_basic:OK
  #255     tc_opts_before:OK
  #256     tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
  #257     tc_opts_chain_mixed:OK
  #258     tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
  #259     tc_opts_demixed:OK
  #260     tc_opts_detach:OK
  #261     tc_opts_detach_after:OK
  #262     tc_opts_detach_before:OK
  #263     tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
  #264     tc_opts_invalid:OK
  #265     tc_opts_max:OK
  #266     tc_opts_mixed:OK
  #267     tc_opts_prepend:OK
  #268     tc_opts_query:OK
  #269     tc_opts_query_attach:OK     <--- (new test)
  #270     tc_opts_replace:OK
  #271     tc_opts_revision:OK
  Summary: 20/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006220655.1653-6-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lgirdwood lgirdwood lgirdwood left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@xiulipan @lgirdwood @plbossart