Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: automatic versioning and package publishing #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

thompsonson
Copy link
Owner

@thompsonson thompsonson commented Mar 1, 2024

Type

enhancement


Description

  • Enhanced the GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow to trigger on push events to the main branch and on tags that start with 'v'.
  • Updated the release job to run not only on pushes to main but also on tags that start with 'v', improving the automation around versioning and package publishing.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
ci-cd.yml
Enhance CI/CD Workflow Triggers and Release Conditions     

.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml

  • Modified triggers for the workflow to run on push to main branch and
    tags that start with 'v'.
  • Adjusted the release job condition to trigger on push to main or tags
    starting with 'v'.
  • +13/-2   

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 1, 2024
    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024

    PR Description updated to latest commit (28f7981)

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are focused on the CI/CD configuration, specifically within the GitHub Actions workflow. The modifications are straightforward, involving trigger adjustments and conditional logic for the release job. The clarity of the changes and their limited scope make this PR relatively easy to review.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    The PR does not seem to address scenarios where tags do not follow the 'v*' pattern strictly. This might lead to unintentional skipping of the release job for tags that are intended for release but do not conform to this pattern.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Code feedback:
    relevant file.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml
    suggestion      

    Consider adding a fallback or notification mechanism for tags that do not match the 'v*' pattern but are intended for releases. This could be a separate job in the workflow that checks for tags not matching expected patterns and alerts the team, ensuring no release is unintentionally skipped. [important]

    relevant line- 'v*'

    relevant file.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml
    suggestion      

    To enhance the flexibility of the CI/CD process, consider parameterizing the branch names and tag patterns in the workflow triggers. This allows for easier adjustments and supports more complex workflow requirements without modifying the workflow file directly. [medium]

    relevant line- main


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
    Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
    It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
    Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
    require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Enhancement
    Add a manual trigger option to the workflow.

    Consider adding a workflow_dispatch event to allow manual triggering of the workflow. This
    can be useful for testing or manual operations without needing a push or pull request
    event.

    .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml [3-11]

     on:
       push:
         branches:
           - main
         tags:
           - 'v*'
       pull_request:
         branches:
           - main
    +  workflow_dispatch:
     
    Best practice
    Ensure release job runs only after successful test completion.

    To ensure that the release job only runs on successful completion of the test job,
    consider adding a job status check condition to the 'if' statement.

    .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml [52-54]

     if: |
       github.event_name == 'push' &&
    -  (github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' || startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v'))
    +  (github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' || startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/v')) &&
    +  needs.test.result == 'success'
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @thompsonson thompsonson merged commit a1df0d5 into main Mar 1, 2024
    7 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant