Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement non-OA metadata in export outputs #544

Closed
tosteiner opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #629
Closed

Implement non-OA metadata in export outputs #544

tosteiner opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #629
Assignees
Labels
data model This issue requires or discusses a change in the data model discussion-needed feature/output Metadata output feature New feature or request

Comments

@tosteiner
Copy link
Member

tosteiner commented Feb 5, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As a publisher, I want to be able to distribute metadata that pertains to non-OA titles. which isn't fully possible at the moment.

As a team, we'll need to decide if we want to enable such features.

Additional context

  • JSTOR ONIX output currently not accurate for non-OA books (White Horse Press use case - fields such as <Unpriced Item Type> are output hard-coded); this is probably also the case for some other ONIX outputs
  • SciELO publishers: Amanda notes many of them will likely be seeking to use Thoth to manage metadata also for books that are not in SciELO, and non-OA. ONIX fields for e.g. regional dissemination restrictions one particular field that would be needed and is currently missing.
  • More generally, other hybrid presses would also benefit from from this expansion.
@tosteiner tosteiner added feature New feature or request feature/output Metadata output data model This issue requires or discusses a change in the data model discussion-needed labels Feb 5, 2024
@rhigman
Copy link
Member

rhigman commented Feb 5, 2024

Similarly to the point about ONIX, the MARC output also currently includes a blanket OA statement. This could be amended while fixing #525 (e.g. move under the CC licence check, as per the incorrectly-implemented 1c8a0ce).

@ja573 ja573 changed the title Expand metadata model to include non-OA data fields Implement non-OA metadata in export outputs Feb 7, 2024
@rhigman rhigman self-assigned this Sep 11, 2024
@rhigman
Copy link
Member

rhigman commented Sep 11, 2024

To be implemented based on assuming that works with a licence URL supplied are OA, and works without are non-OA.

@rhigman
Copy link
Member

rhigman commented Sep 16, 2024

#629 implements conditional outputting of existing OA-related information, but does not make any changes to the data model, e.g. to add storage of regional dissemination restrictions as mentioned in original description.

rhigman added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
 Implement non-OA metadata in export outputs (#544)
@rhigman rhigman closed this as completed Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data model This issue requires or discusses a change in the data model discussion-needed feature/output Metadata output feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants