Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

require optional arguments to be named #105

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024
Merged

require optional arguments to be named #105

merged 7 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

simonpcouch
Copy link
Contributor

Related to tidymodels/tune#863 and tidymodels/extratests#207. Not nearly as many changes needed as tune itself.

note that this adds a `call` argument for compatibility with the `tune_results` method--otherwise, tune will add one when calling `show_best()` inside of `select_best()` and trigger a nonempty dots error
preserves the previous behavior of respecting `type`; this is already tested in extratests
@simonpcouch simonpcouch marked this pull request as ready for review February 29, 2024 22:08
Copy link
Member

@EmilHvitfeldt EmilHvitfeldt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good!

@simonpcouch simonpcouch merged commit c127f2e into main Mar 1, 2024
@simonpcouch simonpcouch deleted the dots-placement branch March 1, 2024 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants