-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
合并原作者提交 #168
Closed
Closed
合并原作者提交 #168
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martinezjavier
pushed a commit
to martinezjavier/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2015
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations torvalds#168: FILE: mm/mlock.c:581: + vm_flags_t newflags = vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED; + newflags |= flags; total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 90 lines checked ./patches/mm-mlock-refactor-mlock-munlock-and-munlockall-code.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ddstreet
pushed a commit
to ddstreet/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2015
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations torvalds#168: FILE: mm/mlock.c:581: + vm_flags_t newflags = vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED; + newflags |= flags; total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 90 lines checked ./patches/mm-mlock-refactor-mlock-munlock-and-munlockall-code.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ddstreet
pushed a commit
to ddstreet/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2015
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations torvalds#168: FILE: mm/mlock.c:581: + vm_flags_t newflags = vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED; + newflags |= flags; total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 90 lines checked ./patches/mm-mlock-refactor-mlock-munlock-and-munlockall-code.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2016
…checkpatch-fixes ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#168: FILE: mm/internal.h:148: +extern struct page * alloc_pages_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 159 lines checked ./patches/mm-compaction-direct-freepage-allocation-for-async-direct-compaction.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2016
…checkpatch-fixes ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#168: FILE: mm/internal.h:148: +extern struct page * alloc_pages_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 159 lines checked ./patches/mm-compaction-direct-freepage-allocation-for-async-direct-compaction.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2016
ERROR: do not initialise globals to NULL torvalds#168: FILE: security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c:188: +void *kexec_buffer = NULL; ERROR: do not initialise globals to 0 torvalds#169: FILE: security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c:189: +size_t kexec_buffer_size = 0; ERROR: do not initialise globals to 0 torvalds#172: FILE: security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c:192: +unsigned long kexec_buffer_load_addr = 0; total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 196 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. ./patches/ima-demonstration-code-for-kexec-buffer-passing.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
koct9i
pushed a commit
to koct9i/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2016
ERROR: do not initialise globals to NULL torvalds#168: FILE: security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c:188: +void *kexec_buffer = NULL; ERROR: do not initialise globals to 0 torvalds#169: FILE: security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c:189: +size_t kexec_buffer_size = 0; ERROR: do not initialise globals to 0 torvalds#172: FILE: security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c:192: +unsigned long kexec_buffer_load_addr = 0; total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 196 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. ./patches/ima-demonstration-code-for-kexec-buffer-passing.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2016
WARNING: 'minumum' may be misspelled - perhaps 'minimum'? torvalds#114: FILE: fs/namespace.c:1367: + * to the tree at mnt is one greater than the minumum WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 125 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. ./patches/vfs-make-may_umount_tree-mount-propogation-aware.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
WARNING: 'minumum' may be misspelled - perhaps 'minimum'? torvalds#114: FILE: fs/namespace.c:1367: + * to the tree at mnt is one greater than the minumum WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 125 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. ./patches/vfs-make-may_umount_tree-mount-propogation-aware.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
WARNING: 'minumum' may be misspelled - perhaps 'minimum'? torvalds#114: FILE: fs/namespace.c:1367: + * to the tree at mnt is one greater than the minumum WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 125 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. ./patches/vfs-make-may_umount_tree-mount-propogation-aware.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2016
WARNING: 'minumum' may be misspelled - perhaps 'minimum'? torvalds#114: FILE: fs/namespace.c:1367: + * to the tree at mnt is one greater than the minumum WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); WARNING: function definition argument 'struct mount *' should also have an identifier name torvalds#168: FILE: fs/pnode.h:41: +struct mount *propagation_next(struct mount *, struct mount *); total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 125 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. ./patches/vfs-make-may_umount_tree-mount-propogation-aware.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
cminyard
pushed a commit
to cminyard/linux-ipmi
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2019
When we excute the following commands, we got oops rmmod ipmi_si cat /proc/ioports [ 1623.482380] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.482382] Mem abort info: [ 1623.482383] ESR = 0x96000007 [ 1623.482385] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1623.482386] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1623.482387] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1623.482388] Data abort info: [ 1623.482389] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [ 1623.482390] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 1623.482393] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000d7d94a66 [ 1623.482395] [ffff00000901d478] pgd=000000dffbfff003, pud=000000dffbffe003, pmd=0000003f5d06e003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 1623.482399] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [ 1623.487407] Modules linked in: ipmi_si(E) nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log iw_cm dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ses ghash_ce sha2_ce enclosure sha256_arm64 sg sha1_ce hisi_sas_v2_hw hibmc_drm sbsa_gwdt hisi_sas_main ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf hns_enet_drv ipmi_msghandler hns_mdio [last unloaded: ipmi_si] [ 1623.532410] CPU: 30 PID: 11438 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.0.0-rc3+ torvalds#168 [ 1623.541498] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 1623.548822] pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 1623.553684] pc : string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.557040] lr : vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.560837] sp : ffff000013213a80 [ 1623.564191] x29: ffff000013213a80 x28: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.569577] x27: ffff000013213c18 x26: ffff805f67d06049 [ 1623.574963] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.580349] x23: 0000000000000fb7 x22: ffff0000117ed000 [ 1623.585734] x21: ffff000011188fd8 x20: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.591119] x19: ffff805f67d06061 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.596505] x17: 0000000000000200 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.601890] x15: ffff0000117ed748 x14: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.607276] x13: ffff805f67d0605e x12: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.612661] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.618046] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 000000000000000f [ 1623.623432] x7 : ffff805f67d06061 x6 : fffffffffffffffe [ 1623.628817] x5 : 0000000000000012 x4 : ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.634203] x3 : ffff0a00ffffff04 x2 : ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.639588] x1 : ffff805f67d07000 x0 : ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.644974] Process cat (pid: 11438, stack limit = 0x000000008d4cbc10) [ 1623.651592] Call trace: [ 1623.654068] string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.657071] vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.660517] seq_vprintf+0x70/0x98 [ 1623.668009] seq_printf+0x7c/0xa0 [ 1623.675530] r_show+0xc8/0xf8 [ 1623.682558] seq_read+0x330/0x440 [ 1623.689877] proc_reg_read+0x78/0xd0 [ 1623.697346] __vfs_read+0x60/0x1a0 [ 1623.704564] vfs_read+0x94/0x150 [ 1623.711339] ksys_read+0x6c/0xd8 [ 1623.717939] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x30 [ 1623.725077] el0_svc_common+0x120/0x148 [ 1623.732035] el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x40 [ 1623.738757] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 1623.744520] Code: d1000406 aa0103e2 54000149 b4000080 (39400085) [ 1623.753441] ---[ end trace f91b6a4937de9835 ]--- [ 1623.760871] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 1623.768935] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 1623.775718] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 1623.781998] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 1623.788777] Memory Limit: none [ 1623.798329] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 1623.805202] Bye! If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init() goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi() will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free when cat /proc/ioports. Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err. and don't call io_cleanup() until io_setup() returns successful to avoid warning prints. Fixes: 93c303d ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
cminyard
pushed a commit
to cminyard/linux-ipmi
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2019
When we excute the following commands, we got oops rmmod ipmi_si cat /proc/ioports [ 1623.482380] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.482382] Mem abort info: [ 1623.482383] ESR = 0x96000007 [ 1623.482385] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1623.482386] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1623.482387] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1623.482388] Data abort info: [ 1623.482389] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [ 1623.482390] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 1623.482393] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000d7d94a66 [ 1623.482395] [ffff00000901d478] pgd=000000dffbfff003, pud=000000dffbffe003, pmd=0000003f5d06e003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 1623.482399] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [ 1623.487407] Modules linked in: ipmi_si(E) nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log iw_cm dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ses ghash_ce sha2_ce enclosure sha256_arm64 sg sha1_ce hisi_sas_v2_hw hibmc_drm sbsa_gwdt hisi_sas_main ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf hns_enet_drv ipmi_msghandler hns_mdio [last unloaded: ipmi_si] [ 1623.532410] CPU: 30 PID: 11438 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.0.0-rc3+ torvalds#168 [ 1623.541498] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 1623.548822] pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 1623.553684] pc : string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.557040] lr : vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.560837] sp : ffff000013213a80 [ 1623.564191] x29: ffff000013213a80 x28: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.569577] x27: ffff000013213c18 x26: ffff805f67d06049 [ 1623.574963] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.580349] x23: 0000000000000fb7 x22: ffff0000117ed000 [ 1623.585734] x21: ffff000011188fd8 x20: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.591119] x19: ffff805f67d06061 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.596505] x17: 0000000000000200 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.601890] x15: ffff0000117ed748 x14: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.607276] x13: ffff805f67d0605e x12: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.612661] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.618046] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 000000000000000f [ 1623.623432] x7 : ffff805f67d06061 x6 : fffffffffffffffe [ 1623.628817] x5 : 0000000000000012 x4 : ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.634203] x3 : ffff0a00ffffff04 x2 : ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.639588] x1 : ffff805f67d07000 x0 : ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.644974] Process cat (pid: 11438, stack limit = 0x000000008d4cbc10) [ 1623.651592] Call trace: [ 1623.654068] string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.657071] vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.660517] seq_vprintf+0x70/0x98 [ 1623.668009] seq_printf+0x7c/0xa0 [ 1623.675530] r_show+0xc8/0xf8 [ 1623.682558] seq_read+0x330/0x440 [ 1623.689877] proc_reg_read+0x78/0xd0 [ 1623.697346] __vfs_read+0x60/0x1a0 [ 1623.704564] vfs_read+0x94/0x150 [ 1623.711339] ksys_read+0x6c/0xd8 [ 1623.717939] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x30 [ 1623.725077] el0_svc_common+0x120/0x148 [ 1623.732035] el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x40 [ 1623.738757] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 1623.744520] Code: d1000406 aa0103e2 54000149 b4000080 (39400085) [ 1623.753441] ---[ end trace f91b6a4937de9835 ]--- [ 1623.760871] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 1623.768935] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 1623.775718] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 1623.781998] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 1623.788777] Memory Limit: none [ 1623.798329] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 1623.805202] Bye! If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init() goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi() will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free when cat /proc/ioports. Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err. and don't call io_cleanup() until io_setup() returns successful to avoid warning prints. Fixes: 93c303d ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
damentz
referenced
this pull request
in zen-kernel/zen-kernel
Mar 23, 2019
commit 401e7e8 upstream. When we excute the following commands, we got oops rmmod ipmi_si cat /proc/ioports [ 1623.482380] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.482382] Mem abort info: [ 1623.482383] ESR = 0x96000007 [ 1623.482385] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1623.482386] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1623.482387] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1623.482388] Data abort info: [ 1623.482389] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [ 1623.482390] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 1623.482393] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000d7d94a66 [ 1623.482395] [ffff00000901d478] pgd=000000dffbfff003, pud=000000dffbffe003, pmd=0000003f5d06e003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 1623.482399] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [ 1623.487407] Modules linked in: ipmi_si(E) nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log iw_cm dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ses ghash_ce sha2_ce enclosure sha256_arm64 sg sha1_ce hisi_sas_v2_hw hibmc_drm sbsa_gwdt hisi_sas_main ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf hns_enet_drv ipmi_msghandler hns_mdio [last unloaded: ipmi_si] [ 1623.532410] CPU: 30 PID: 11438 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.0.0-rc3+ #168 [ 1623.541498] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 1623.548822] pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 1623.553684] pc : string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.557040] lr : vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.560837] sp : ffff000013213a80 [ 1623.564191] x29: ffff000013213a80 x28: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.569577] x27: ffff000013213c18 x26: ffff805f67d06049 [ 1623.574963] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.580349] x23: 0000000000000fb7 x22: ffff0000117ed000 [ 1623.585734] x21: ffff000011188fd8 x20: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.591119] x19: ffff805f67d06061 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.596505] x17: 0000000000000200 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.601890] x15: ffff0000117ed748 x14: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.607276] x13: ffff805f67d0605e x12: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.612661] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.618046] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 000000000000000f [ 1623.623432] x7 : ffff805f67d06061 x6 : fffffffffffffffe [ 1623.628817] x5 : 0000000000000012 x4 : ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.634203] x3 : ffff0a00ffffff04 x2 : ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.639588] x1 : ffff805f67d07000 x0 : ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.644974] Process cat (pid: 11438, stack limit = 0x000000008d4cbc10) [ 1623.651592] Call trace: [ 1623.654068] string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.657071] vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.660517] seq_vprintf+0x70/0x98 [ 1623.668009] seq_printf+0x7c/0xa0 [ 1623.675530] r_show+0xc8/0xf8 [ 1623.682558] seq_read+0x330/0x440 [ 1623.689877] proc_reg_read+0x78/0xd0 [ 1623.697346] __vfs_read+0x60/0x1a0 [ 1623.704564] vfs_read+0x94/0x150 [ 1623.711339] ksys_read+0x6c/0xd8 [ 1623.717939] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x30 [ 1623.725077] el0_svc_common+0x120/0x148 [ 1623.732035] el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x40 [ 1623.738757] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 1623.744520] Code: d1000406 aa0103e2 54000149 b4000080 (39400085) [ 1623.753441] ---[ end trace f91b6a4937de9835 ]--- [ 1623.760871] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 1623.768935] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 1623.775718] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 1623.781998] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 1623.788777] Memory Limit: none [ 1623.798329] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 1623.805202] Bye! If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init() goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi() will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free when cat /proc/ioports. Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err. and don't call io_cleanup() until io_setup() returns successful to avoid warning prints. Fixes: 93c303d ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
damentz
referenced
this pull request
in zen-kernel/zen-kernel
Mar 23, 2019
commit 401e7e8 upstream. When we excute the following commands, we got oops rmmod ipmi_si cat /proc/ioports [ 1623.482380] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.482382] Mem abort info: [ 1623.482383] ESR = 0x96000007 [ 1623.482385] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1623.482386] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1623.482387] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1623.482388] Data abort info: [ 1623.482389] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [ 1623.482390] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 1623.482393] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000d7d94a66 [ 1623.482395] [ffff00000901d478] pgd=000000dffbfff003, pud=000000dffbffe003, pmd=0000003f5d06e003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 1623.482399] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [ 1623.487407] Modules linked in: ipmi_si(E) nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log iw_cm dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ses ghash_ce sha2_ce enclosure sha256_arm64 sg sha1_ce hisi_sas_v2_hw hibmc_drm sbsa_gwdt hisi_sas_main ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf hns_enet_drv ipmi_msghandler hns_mdio [last unloaded: ipmi_si] [ 1623.532410] CPU: 30 PID: 11438 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.0.0-rc3+ #168 [ 1623.541498] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 1623.548822] pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 1623.553684] pc : string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.557040] lr : vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.560837] sp : ffff000013213a80 [ 1623.564191] x29: ffff000013213a80 x28: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.569577] x27: ffff000013213c18 x26: ffff805f67d06049 [ 1623.574963] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.580349] x23: 0000000000000fb7 x22: ffff0000117ed000 [ 1623.585734] x21: ffff000011188fd8 x20: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.591119] x19: ffff805f67d06061 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.596505] x17: 0000000000000200 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.601890] x15: ffff0000117ed748 x14: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.607276] x13: ffff805f67d0605e x12: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.612661] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.618046] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 000000000000000f [ 1623.623432] x7 : ffff805f67d06061 x6 : fffffffffffffffe [ 1623.628817] x5 : 0000000000000012 x4 : ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.634203] x3 : ffff0a00ffffff04 x2 : ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.639588] x1 : ffff805f67d07000 x0 : ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.644974] Process cat (pid: 11438, stack limit = 0x000000008d4cbc10) [ 1623.651592] Call trace: [ 1623.654068] string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.657071] vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.660517] seq_vprintf+0x70/0x98 [ 1623.668009] seq_printf+0x7c/0xa0 [ 1623.675530] r_show+0xc8/0xf8 [ 1623.682558] seq_read+0x330/0x440 [ 1623.689877] proc_reg_read+0x78/0xd0 [ 1623.697346] __vfs_read+0x60/0x1a0 [ 1623.704564] vfs_read+0x94/0x150 [ 1623.711339] ksys_read+0x6c/0xd8 [ 1623.717939] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x30 [ 1623.725077] el0_svc_common+0x120/0x148 [ 1623.732035] el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x40 [ 1623.738757] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 1623.744520] Code: d1000406 aa0103e2 54000149 b4000080 (39400085) [ 1623.753441] ---[ end trace f91b6a4937de9835 ]--- [ 1623.760871] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 1623.768935] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 1623.775718] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 1623.781998] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 1623.788777] Memory Limit: none [ 1623.798329] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 1623.805202] Bye! If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init() goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi() will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free when cat /proc/ioports. Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err. and don't call io_cleanup() until io_setup() returns successful to avoid warning prints. Fixes: 93c303d ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jackpot51
referenced
this pull request
in pop-os/linux
May 3, 2019
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821607 commit 401e7e8 upstream. When we excute the following commands, we got oops rmmod ipmi_si cat /proc/ioports [ 1623.482380] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.482382] Mem abort info: [ 1623.482383] ESR = 0x96000007 [ 1623.482385] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1623.482386] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1623.482387] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1623.482388] Data abort info: [ 1623.482389] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000007 [ 1623.482390] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 1623.482393] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = 00000000d7d94a66 [ 1623.482395] [ffff00000901d478] pgd=000000dffbfff003, pud=000000dffbffe003, pmd=0000003f5d06e003, pte=0000000000000000 [ 1623.482399] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP [ 1623.487407] Modules linked in: ipmi_si(E) nls_utf8 isofs rpcrdma ib_iser ib_srpt target_core_mod ib_srp scsi_transport_srp ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log iw_cm dm_mod aes_ce_blk crypto_simd cryptd aes_ce_cipher ses ghash_ce sha2_ce enclosure sha256_arm64 sg sha1_ce hisi_sas_v2_hw hibmc_drm sbsa_gwdt hisi_sas_main ip_tables mlx5_ib ib_uverbs marvell ib_core mlx5_core ixgbe mdio hns_dsaf ipmi_devintf hns_enet_drv ipmi_msghandler hns_mdio [last unloaded: ipmi_si] [ 1623.532410] CPU: 30 PID: 11438 Comm: cat Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 5.0.0-rc3+ #168 [ 1623.541498] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.37 11/21/2017 [ 1623.548822] pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 1623.553684] pc : string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.557040] lr : vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.560837] sp : ffff000013213a80 [ 1623.564191] x29: ffff000013213a80 x28: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.569577] x27: ffff000013213c18 x26: ffff805f67d06049 [ 1623.574963] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff00001138abb5 [ 1623.580349] x23: 0000000000000fb7 x22: ffff0000117ed000 [ 1623.585734] x21: ffff000011188fd8 x20: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.591119] x19: ffff805f67d06061 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.596505] x17: 0000000000000200 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.601890] x15: ffff0000117ed748 x14: ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.607276] x13: ffff805f67d0605e x12: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.612661] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 1623.618046] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 000000000000000f [ 1623.623432] x7 : ffff805f67d06061 x6 : fffffffffffffffe [ 1623.628817] x5 : 0000000000000012 x4 : ffff00000901d478 [ 1623.634203] x3 : ffff0a00ffffff04 x2 : ffff805f67d07000 [ 1623.639588] x1 : ffff805f67d07000 x0 : ffffffffffffffff [ 1623.644974] Process cat (pid: 11438, stack limit = 0x000000008d4cbc10) [ 1623.651592] Call trace: [ 1623.654068] string+0x28/0x98 [ 1623.657071] vsnprintf+0x368/0x5e8 [ 1623.660517] seq_vprintf+0x70/0x98 [ 1623.668009] seq_printf+0x7c/0xa0 [ 1623.675530] r_show+0xc8/0xf8 [ 1623.682558] seq_read+0x330/0x440 [ 1623.689877] proc_reg_read+0x78/0xd0 [ 1623.697346] __vfs_read+0x60/0x1a0 [ 1623.704564] vfs_read+0x94/0x150 [ 1623.711339] ksys_read+0x6c/0xd8 [ 1623.717939] __arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x30 [ 1623.725077] el0_svc_common+0x120/0x148 [ 1623.732035] el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x40 [ 1623.738757] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 1623.744520] Code: d1000406 aa0103e2 54000149 b4000080 (39400085) [ 1623.753441] ---[ end trace f91b6a4937de9835 ]--- [ 1623.760871] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 1623.768935] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 1623.775718] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 1623.781998] CPU features: 0x002,21006008 [ 1623.788777] Memory Limit: none [ 1623.798329] Starting crashdump kernel... [ 1623.805202] Bye! If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init() goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi() will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free when cat /proc/ioports. Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err. and don't call io_cleanup() until io_setup() returns successful to avoid warning prints. Fixes: 93c303d ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2020
trying to configure TC 'act_gate' rules with invalid control actions, the following splat can be observed: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017] CPU: 1 PID: 2143 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ torvalds#168 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hrtimer_active+0x56/0x290 [...] Call Trace: hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x6d/0x330 hrtimer_cancel+0x11/0x20 tcf_gate_cleanup+0x15/0x30 [act_gate] tcf_action_cleanup+0x58/0x170 __tcf_action_put+0xb0/0xe0 __tcf_idr_release+0x68/0x90 tcf_gate_init+0x7c7/0x19a0 [act_gate] tcf_action_init_1+0x60f/0x960 tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0 tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0 tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890 ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160 __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 this is caused by hrtimer_cancel(), running before hrtimer_init(). Fix it ensuring to call hrtimer_cancel() only if clockid is valid, and the timer has been initialized. After fixing this splat, the same error path causes another problem: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 1 PID: 980 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ torvalds#168 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:release_entry_list+0x4a/0x240 [act_gate] [...] Call Trace: tcf_action_cleanup+0x58/0x170 __tcf_action_put+0xb0/0xe0 __tcf_idr_release+0x68/0x90 tcf_gate_init+0x7ab/0x19a0 [act_gate] tcf_action_init_1+0x60f/0x960 tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0 tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0 tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890 ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160 __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 the problem is similar: tcf_action_cleanup() was trying to release a list without initializing it first. Ensure that INIT_LIST_HEAD() is called for every newly created 'act_gate' action, same as what was done to 'act_ife' with commit 44c23d7 ("net/sched: act_ife: initalize ife->metalist earlier"). Fixes: a51c328 ("net: qos: introduce a gate control flow action") CC: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2020
trying to configure TC 'act_gate' rules with invalid control actions, the following splat can be observed: # tc action add action gate index 42 clockid CLOCK_TAI goto chain 42 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017] CPU: 1 PID: 2143 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ torvalds#168 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hrtimer_active+0x56/0x290 [...] Call Trace: hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x6d/0x330 hrtimer_cancel+0x11/0x20 tcf_gate_cleanup+0x15/0x30 [act_gate] tcf_action_cleanup+0x58/0x170 __tcf_action_put+0xb0/0xe0 __tcf_idr_release+0x68/0x90 tcf_gate_init+0x7c7/0x19a0 [act_gate] tcf_action_init_1+0x60f/0x960 tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0 tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0 tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890 ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160 __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 this is caused by hrtimer_cancel(), running before hrtimer_init(). Fix it ensuring to call hrtimer_cancel() only if clockid is valid, and the timer has been initialized. After fixing this splat, the same error path causes another problem: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 1 PID: 980 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ torvalds#168 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:release_entry_list+0x4a/0x240 [act_gate] [...] Call Trace: tcf_action_cleanup+0x58/0x170 __tcf_action_put+0xb0/0xe0 __tcf_idr_release+0x68/0x90 tcf_gate_init+0x7ab/0x19a0 [act_gate] tcf_action_init_1+0x60f/0x960 tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0 tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0 tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890 ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160 __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 the problem is similar: tcf_action_cleanup() was trying to release a list without initializing it first. Ensure that INIT_LIST_HEAD() is called for every newly created 'act_gate' action, same as what was done to 'act_ife' with commit 44c23d7 ("net/sched: act_ife: initalize ife->metalist earlier"). Changes since v1: - fix typo in the subject (tfc_gate_init->tcf_gate_init) - change commit message to include an example of command that triggers the error path of tcf_gate_init(). Suggested by Po Liu - assign 'gact' earlier to reduce usage of to_gate() Fixes: a51c328 ("net: qos: introduce a gate control flow action") CC: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2020
trying to configure TC 'act_gate' rules with invalid control actions, the following splat can be observed: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017] CPU: 1 PID: 2143 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ torvalds#168 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:hrtimer_active+0x56/0x290 [...] Call Trace: hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x6d/0x330 hrtimer_cancel+0x11/0x20 tcf_gate_cleanup+0x15/0x30 [act_gate] tcf_action_cleanup+0x58/0x170 __tcf_action_put+0xb0/0xe0 __tcf_idr_release+0x68/0x90 tcf_gate_init+0x7c7/0x19a0 [act_gate] tcf_action_init_1+0x60f/0x960 tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0 tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0 tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890 ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160 __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 this is caused by hrtimer_cancel(), running before hrtimer_init(). Fix it ensuring to call hrtimer_cancel() only if clockid is valid, and the timer has been initialized. After fixing this splat, the same error path causes another problem: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 1 PID: 980 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0-rc6+ torvalds#168 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:release_entry_list+0x4a/0x240 [act_gate] [...] Call Trace: tcf_action_cleanup+0x58/0x170 __tcf_action_put+0xb0/0xe0 __tcf_idr_release+0x68/0x90 tcf_gate_init+0x7ab/0x19a0 [act_gate] tcf_action_init_1+0x60f/0x960 tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0 tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0 tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920 netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890 ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160 __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170 do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 the problem is similar: tcf_action_cleanup() was trying to release a list without initializing it first. Ensure that INIT_LIST_HEAD() is called for every newly created 'act_gate' action, same as what was done to 'act_ife' with commit 44c23d7 ("net/sched: act_ife: initalize ife->metalist earlier"). Fixes: a51c328 ("net: qos: introduce a gate control flow action") CC: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2020
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
tobetter
pushed a commit
to tobetter/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2020
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2021
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2021
Convert S_<FOO> permissions to the more readable octal. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw5v23T-zvDZp-MmD_EYxF8WbafwwB59934FV7g21uMGQ@mail.gmail.com/ Done using: $ git ls-files -- drivers/gpu/drm/*.[ch] | xargs ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS No difference in generated .o files allyesconfig x86-64 The files below were not compiled for x86-64: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_perf.c drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_rd.c drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c checkpatch does report several places where permissions perhaps could be downgraded. None of these locations are modified by this patch. WARNING:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting world writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#165: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1146: + debugfs_create_file("ras_ctrl", 0666, con->dir, ERROR:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#165: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1146: + debugfs_create_file("ras_ctrl", 0666, con->dir, adev, &amdgpu_ras_debugfs_ctrl_ops); WARNING:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting world writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#168: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1148: + debugfs_create_file("ras_eeprom_reset", 0666, con->dir, ERROR:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#168: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1148: + debugfs_create_file("ras_eeprom_reset", 0666, con->dir, adev, &amdgpu_ras_debugfs_eeprom_ops); WARNING:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting world writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#177: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1159: + debugfs_create_bool("auto_reboot", 0666, con->dir, ERROR:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#177: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:1159: + debugfs_create_bool("auto_reboot", 0666, con->dir, &con->reboot); WARNING:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting world writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#688: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c:157: + debugfs_create_file("reset", 0222, minor->debugfs_root, dev, ERROR:EXPORTED_WORLD_WRITABLE: Exporting writable files is usually an error. Consider more restrictive permissions. torvalds#688: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c:157: + debugfs_create_file("reset", 0222, minor->debugfs_root, dev, &reset_fops); Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
chombourger
pushed a commit
to chombourger/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2021
…from PLSDK-2774 to processor-sdk-linux-4.19.y * commit '453a15776ebedc63fa1f46d02ef0eff503e27f29': dt-bindings: net: ti,icssg-prueth: update to clarify dual icssg usage
cythe
pushed a commit
to cythe/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2021
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#168: FILE: include/hal_com.h:168: +typedef enum _RT_MEDIA_STATUS { Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marco.cesati@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: do not add new typedefs torvalds#168: FILE: include/hal_com.h:168: +typedef enum _RT_MEDIA_STATUS { Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marco.cesati@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312082638.25512-12-marco.cesati@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
htot
pushed a commit
to edison-fw/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2021
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2021
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
ojeda
pushed a commit
to ojeda/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2021
README.md: Link to mailing list archive
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2021
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
kernelOfTruth
pushed a commit
to kernelOfTruth/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2021
Booting a recent PREEMPT_RT kernel (v5.10-rc3-rt7-rebase) on my arm64 Juno leads to the idle task blocking on an RT sleeping spinlock down some notifier path: [ 1.809101] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/5/0/0x00000002 [ 1.809116] Modules linked in: [ 1.809123] Preemption disabled at: [ 1.809125] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:227) [ 1.809146] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3-rt7 torvalds#168 [ 1.809153] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT) [ 1.809158] Call trace: [ 1.809160] dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:100 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809170] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:198) [ 1.809178] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:122) [ 1.809188] __schedule_bug (kernel/sched/core.c:4886) [ 1.809197] __schedule (./arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h:18 kernel/sched/core.c:4913 kernel/sched/core.c:5040) [ 1.809204] preempt_schedule_lock (kernel/sched/core.c:5365 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809210] rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1072) [ 1.809217] rt_spin_lock_slowlock (kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1110) [ 1.809224] rt_spin_lock (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:647 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1139) [ 1.809231] atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust (kernel/notifier.c:71 kernel/notifier.c:118 kernel/notifier.c:186) [ 1.809240] cpu_pm_enter (kernel/cpu_pm.c:39 kernel/cpu_pm.c:93) [ 1.809249] psci_enter_idle_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:52 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c:129) [ 1.809258] cpuidle_enter_state (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:238) [ 1.809267] cpuidle_enter (drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:353) [ 1.809275] do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:132 kernel/sched/idle.c:213 kernel/sched/idle.c:273) [ 1.809282] cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:368 (discriminator 1)) [ 1.809288] secondary_start_kernel (arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:273) Two points worth noting: 1) That this is conceptually the same issue as pointed out in: 313c8c1 ("PM / CPU: replace raw_notifier with atomic_notifier") 2) Only the _robust() variant of atomic_notifier callchains suffer from this AFAICT only the cpu_pm_notifier_chain really needs to be changed, but singling it out would mean introducing a new (truly) non-blocking API. At the same time, callers that are fine with any blocking within the call chain should use blocking notifiers, so patching up all atomic_notifier's doesn't seem *too* crazy to me. Fixes: 70d9329 ("notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122201904.30940-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
mj22226
pushed a commit
to mj22226/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2022
If we specify the property of acodec "rockchip,no-hp-det", we shouldn't queue the hpdet_work that is without initialized, and the dwork timer->function is NULL. The crashed log: === [ 0.666484] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.666536] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/workqueue.c:1657 __queue_delayed_work+0x51/0xd8 [ 0.666553] Modules linked in: [ 0.666586] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.110 torvalds#168 [ 0.666602] Hardware name: Generic DT based system Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> Change-Id: I66de7c031c6d7373eb77e65448771eb183e0888b
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2022
PD#150471: hdmitx: driver defect clean up: torvalds#168 torvalds#186 torvalds#200 torvalds#211 torvalds#192 Change-Id: Iffafec12c39cd98f8260a99417cb709ccc94935d Signed-off-by: Yi Zhou <yi.zhou@amlogic.com>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
PD#150471: hdmitx: driver defect clean up: torvalds#168 torvalds#186 torvalds#200 torvalds#211 torvalds#192 Change-Id: Iffafec12c39cd98f8260a99417cb709ccc94935d Signed-off-by: Yi Zhou <yi.zhou@amlogic.com>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2023
The test case creates 4 threads and then pins these 4 threads in CPU 0. These 4 threads will run different bpf program through bpf_prog_test_run_opts() and these bpf program will use bpf_obj_new() and bpf_obj_drop() to allocate and free local kptrs concurrently. Under preemptible kernel, bpf_obj_new() and bpf_obj_drop() may preempt each other, bpf_obj_new() may return NULL and the test will fail before applying these fixes as shown below: test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:attach 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:FAIL:ENOMEM unexpected ENOMEM: got TRUE torvalds#168 preempted_bpf_ma_op:FAIL Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901111954.1804721-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
The test case creates 4 threads and then pins these 4 threads in CPU 0. These 4 threads will run different bpf program through bpf_prog_test_run_opts() and these bpf program will use bpf_obj_new() and bpf_obj_drop() to allocate and free local kptrs concurrently. Under preemptible kernel, bpf_obj_new() and bpf_obj_drop() may preempt each other, bpf_obj_new() may return NULL and the test will fail before applying these fixes as shown below: test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:attach 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:no test prog 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:PASS:run prog err 0 nsec test_preempted_bpf_ma_op:FAIL:ENOMEM unexpected ENOMEM: got TRUE torvalds#168 preempted_bpf_ma_op:FAIL Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230901111954.1804721-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2024
There are still some "ENOTSUPP" (-524) errors left when running BPF selftests on a Loongarch platform since ASSERT_GE() are used there to check the return values, not ASSERT_OK(): ''' test_bpf_cookie:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec torvalds#17/1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK torvalds#17/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:OK torvalds#17/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK torvalds#17/5 bpf_cookie/multi_uprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/6 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK torvalds#17/7 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK tracing_subtest:FAIL:fentry.link_create unexpected fentry.link_create: \ actual -524 < expected 0 torvalds#17/8 bpf_cookie/trampoline:FAIL lsm_subtest:FAIL:lsm.link_create unexpected lsm.link_create: \ actual -524 < expected 0 torvalds#17/9 bpf_cookie/lsm:FAIL torvalds#17/10 bpf_cookie/tp_btf:OK torvalds#17/11 bpf_cookie/raw_tp:OK torvalds#17 bpf_cookie:FAIL ... ... test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:load_vmlinux_btf 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:get_bpf_testmod_btf_fd 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:btf_get_from_fd 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:btf_find_by_name 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:btf_find_by_name 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:bpf_prog_load 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:FAIL:bpf_link_create unexpected \ bpf_link_create: actual -524 < expected 0 torvalds#168 module_fentry_shadow:FAIL ''' Just like in ASSERT_OK(), this patch skips ENOTSUPP (524) and ENOTSUP (95) in ASSERT_GT() too. With this change, the new output of these selftests look like: ''' torvalds#17/1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK torvalds#17/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:OK torvalds#17/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK torvalds#17/5 bpf_cookie/multi_uprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/6 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK torvalds#17/7 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK torvalds#17/8 bpf_cookie/trampoline:SKIP torvalds#17/9 bpf_cookie/lsm:SKIP torvalds#17/10 bpf_cookie/tp_btf:SKIP torvalds#17/11 bpf_cookie/raw_tp:SKIP torvalds#17 bpf_cookie:OK (SKIP: 4/11) ... ... torvalds#168 module_fentry_shadow:SKIP ''' Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
There are still some "ENOTSUPP" (-524) errors left when running BPF selftests on a Loongarch platform since ASSERT_GE() are used there to check the return values, not ASSERT_OK(): ''' test_bpf_cookie:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec torvalds#17/1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK torvalds#17/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:OK torvalds#17/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK torvalds#17/5 bpf_cookie/multi_uprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/6 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK torvalds#17/7 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK tracing_subtest:FAIL:fentry.link_create unexpected fentry.link_create: \ actual -524 < expected 0 torvalds#17/8 bpf_cookie/trampoline:FAIL lsm_subtest:FAIL:lsm.link_create unexpected lsm.link_create: \ actual -524 < expected 0 torvalds#17/9 bpf_cookie/lsm:FAIL torvalds#17/10 bpf_cookie/tp_btf:OK torvalds#17/11 bpf_cookie/raw_tp:OK torvalds#17 bpf_cookie:FAIL ... ... test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:load_vmlinux_btf 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:get_bpf_testmod_btf_fd 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:btf_get_from_fd 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:btf_find_by_name 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:btf_find_by_name 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:PASS:bpf_prog_load 0 nsec test_module_fentry_shadow:FAIL:bpf_link_create unexpected \ bpf_link_create: actual -524 < expected 0 torvalds#168 module_fentry_shadow:FAIL ''' Just like in ASSERT_OK(), this patch uses test_progs_get_error() helper to skip ENOTSUPP (524) and ENOTSUP (95) in ASSERT_GT() too. With this change, the new output of these selftests look like: ''' torvalds#17/1 bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK torvalds#17/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:OK torvalds#17/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/4 bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK torvalds#17/5 bpf_cookie/multi_uprobe_attach_api:OK torvalds#17/6 bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK torvalds#17/7 bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK torvalds#17/8 bpf_cookie/trampoline:SKIP torvalds#17/9 bpf_cookie/lsm:SKIP torvalds#17/10 bpf_cookie/tp_btf:SKIP torvalds#17/11 bpf_cookie/raw_tp:SKIP torvalds#17 bpf_cookie:OK (SKIP: 4/11) ... ... torvalds#168 module_fentry_shadow:SKIP ''' Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.