-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added usb-device desriptor for Sagem USB-Serial Controller #315
Open
krajcovic
wants to merge
1
commit into
torvalds:master
Choose a base branch
from
krajcovic:add_usb_eft30_descriptor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Changes to be committed: modified: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
dmesg |
laijs
pushed a commit
to laijs/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2017
lkl: add LKL_HIJACK_NET_QDISC to configure qdisc policy
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2017
Fixed issues: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#71: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:71: + audio_info("alsa_stream=%p substream=%p\n", alsa_stream, + alsa_stream ? alsa_stream->substream : 0); CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#262: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:262: +static int snd_bcm2835_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params) CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#315: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:315: + err = bcm2835_audio_set_params(alsa_stream, channels, + alsa_stream->params_rate, CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#384: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:384: + audio_debug("bcm2835_AUDIO_TRIGGER_START running=%d\n", + alsa_stream->running); CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#391: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:391: + bytes_to_frames(runtime, + alsa_stream->pos); CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#436: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:436: + audio_debug("pcm_pointer... (%d) hwptr=%d appl=%d pos=%d\n", 0, + frames_to_bytes(runtime, runtime->status->hw_ptr), CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#447: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:447: +static int snd_bcm2835_pcm_lib_ioctl(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, + unsigned int cmd, void *arg) CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#452: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:452: + audio_info(" .. substream=%p, cmd=%d, arg=%p (%x) ret=%d\n", substream, + cmd, arg, arg ? *(unsigned *) arg : 0, ret); CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis torvalds#544: FILE: drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-pcm.c:544: + snd_pcm_lib_preallocate_pages_for_all(pcm, SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_CONTINUOUS, + snd_dma_continuous_data(GFP_KERNEL), Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <sfaragnaus@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#19: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:19: +static struct COEX_DM_8723B_2ANT * pCoexDm = &GLCoexDm8723b2Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#21: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:21: +static struct COEX_STA_8723B_2ANT * pCoexSta = &GLCoexSta8723b2Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#111: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:111: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#192: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:192: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#215: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:215: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_MonitorBtCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#265: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:265: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_QueryBtInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#282: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:282: +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsWifiStatusChanged(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:313: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_UpdateBtLinkInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:315: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#377: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:377: +static u8 halbtc8723b2ant_ActionAlgorithm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#379: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:379: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#552: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:552: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 dacSwingLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#576: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:576: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 decBtPwrLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#597: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:597: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 decBtPwrLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#631: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:631: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 fwDacSwingLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#666: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:666: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:689: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bRxRfShrinkOn ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#723: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:723: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#751: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:751: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #785: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:785: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_SetDacSwingReg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u32 level) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#798: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:798: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bSwDacSwingOn, u32 swDacSwingLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:809: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#853: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:853: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bAgcTableEn ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#913: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:913: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bAgcTableEn ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#947: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:947: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#984: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:984: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1050: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1050: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1099: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1120: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1120: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1148: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1148: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1187: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1187: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1199: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1199: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1211: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1211: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 antPosType, bool bInitHwCfg, bool bWifiOff ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1214: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1214: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1305: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1305: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bTurnOn, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1437: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1437: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_CoexAllOff(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1453: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1453: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1465: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1465: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionBtInquiry(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1493: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1493: +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsCommonAction(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1594: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1594: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bScoHid, bool bTxPause, u8 maxInterval ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2044: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2044: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionSco(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2099: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2160: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2160: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2241: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2241: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dpPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2291: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2291: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2349: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2349: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2399: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2399: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2460: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2460: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2524: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2524: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dpPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2584: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2584: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2659: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2659: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_RunCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2758: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2758: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_WifiOffHwCfg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2783: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2783: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bBackUp) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2817: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2817: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2819: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2819: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2869: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2869: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2874: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2874: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2881: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2881: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2883: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2883: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2884: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2884: + struct BTC_STACK_INFO * pStackInfo = &pBtCoexist->stackInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2885: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2885: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3262: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3262: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3279: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3279: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3290: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3290: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3299: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3299: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3308: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3308: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3354: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3354: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3362: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3362: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3506: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3506: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3517: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3517: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3531: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3531: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338: +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349: +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353: +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363: +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393: +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420: + struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448: +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560: +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717: +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306: +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400: + struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table; Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#19: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:19: +static struct COEX_DM_8723B_2ANT * pCoexDm = &GLCoexDm8723b2Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#21: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:21: +static struct COEX_STA_8723B_2ANT * pCoexSta = &GLCoexSta8723b2Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#111: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:111: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#192: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:192: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#215: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:215: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_MonitorBtCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#265: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:265: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_QueryBtInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#282: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:282: +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsWifiStatusChanged(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:313: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_UpdateBtLinkInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:315: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#377: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:377: +static u8 halbtc8723b2ant_ActionAlgorithm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#379: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:379: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#552: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:552: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 dacSwingLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#576: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:576: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 decBtPwrLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#597: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:597: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 decBtPwrLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#631: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:631: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 fwDacSwingLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#666: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:666: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:689: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bRxRfShrinkOn ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#723: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:723: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#751: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:751: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #785: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:785: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_SetDacSwingReg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u32 level) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#798: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:798: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bSwDacSwingOn, u32 swDacSwingLvl ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#809: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:809: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#853: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:853: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bAgcTableEn ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#913: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:913: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bAgcTableEn ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#947: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:947: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#984: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:984: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1050: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1050: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1099: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1120: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1120: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1148: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1148: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1187: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1187: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1199: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1199: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1211: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1211: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 antPosType, bool bInitHwCfg, bool bWifiOff ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1214: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1214: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1305: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1305: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bTurnOn, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1437: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1437: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_CoexAllOff(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1453: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1453: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1465: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1465: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionBtInquiry(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1493: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1493: +static bool halbtc8723b2ant_IsCommonAction(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1594: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:1594: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bScoHid, bool bTxPause, u8 maxInterval ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2044: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2044: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionSco(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2099: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2099: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2160: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2160: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2241: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2241: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionA2dpPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2291: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2291: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2349: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2349: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2399: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2399: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2460: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2460: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionPanEdrHid(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2524: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2524: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dpPanEdr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2584: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2584: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_ActionHidA2dp(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2659: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2659: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_RunCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2758: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2758: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_WifiOffHwCfg(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2783: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2783: +static void halbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bBackUp) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2817: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2817: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2819: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2819: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2869: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2869: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2874: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2874: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2881: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2881: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2883: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2883: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2884: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2884: + struct BTC_STACK_INFO * pStackInfo = &pBtCoexist->stackInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2885: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:2885: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3262: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3262: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3279: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3279: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3290: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3290: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3299: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3299: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3308: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3308: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3354: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3354: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3362: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3362: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3506: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3506: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3517: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3517: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3531: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.c:3531: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-5-marcocesati@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338: +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349: +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353: +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363: +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393: +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420: + struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448: +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560: +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717: +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306: +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400: + struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table; Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210315170618.2566-21-marcocesati@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
roxell
pushed a commit
to roxell/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
intersectRaven
pushed a commit
to intersectRaven/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
damentz
referenced
this pull request
in zen-kernel/zen-kernel
Jul 19, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 linux-sunxi#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2022
PD#150075: driver defect clean up: vdac_dev.c: #5 torvalds#6 torvalds#876 tv_vout.c: torvalds#181 torvalds#267 torvalds#311 torvalds#312 torvalds#313 torvalds#314 torvalds#315 torvalds#532 torvalds#605 Change-Id: I185072efb68df1abdad036a21867bb64efca914c Signed-off-by: Nian Jing <nian.jing@amlogic.com>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
PD#150075: driver defect clean up: vdac_dev.c: #5 torvalds#6 torvalds#876 tv_vout.c: torvalds#181 torvalds#267 torvalds#311 torvalds#312 torvalds#313 torvalds#314 torvalds#315 torvalds#532 torvalds#605 Change-Id: I185072efb68df1abdad036a21867bb64efca914c Signed-off-by: Nian Jing <nian.jing@amlogic.com>
jonhunter
pushed a commit
to jonhunter/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
luigi311
pushed a commit
to luigi311/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
luigi311
pushed a commit
to luigi311/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Kaz205
pushed a commit
to Kaz205/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mj22226
pushed a commit
to mj22226/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Kaz205
pushed a commit
to Kaz205/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
heiher
pushed a commit
to heiher/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1054009064
pushed a commit
to 1054009064/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2024
[ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mpe
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Kaz205
pushed a commit
to Kaz205/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Kaz205
pushed a commit
to Kaz205/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hdeller
pushed a commit
to hdeller/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
[ Upstream commit 8ecf3c1 ] Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: torvalds#82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: torvalds#490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
john-cabaj
pushed a commit
to UbuntuAsahi/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2024
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065400 [ Upstream commit a51cd6b ] In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: torvalds#312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: torvalds#313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: torvalds#314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: torvalds#315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: torvalds#316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: torvalds#317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: torvalds#318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: torvalds#319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20240321081809.158803-1-asavkov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <manuel.diewald@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes to be committed:
modified: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c