Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For better readability updated xz.txt file #524

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mshingote
Copy link

Updated xz.txt file to remove two conservative colons.
Example:: changed to Example:

Updated xz.txt file to remove two conservative colons.
Example:: changed to Example:
@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @mshingote!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

Decatf pushed a commit to Decatf/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
commit f4483f2 upstream.

When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should
continue execution at the following instruction.  An example tail call
sequence is:

  12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
  13: (b7) r0 = 0
  14: (95) exit

The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to
instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter
returning a non-zero value:

  178:	ldr	r8, [sp, torvalds#588]	; insn 12
  17c:	ldr	r6, [r8, r6]
  180:	ldr	r8, [sp, torvalds#580]
  184:	cmp	r8, r6
  188:	bcs	0x1e8
  18c:	ldr	r6, [sp, torvalds#524]
  190:	ldr	r7, [sp, torvalds#528]
  194:	cmp	r7, #0
  198:	cmpeq	r6, torvalds#32
  19c:	bhi	0x1e8
  1a0:	adds	r6, r6, #1
  1a4:	adc	r7, r7, #0
  1a8:	str	r6, [sp, torvalds#524]
  1ac:	str	r7, [sp, torvalds#528]
  1b0:	mov	r6, torvalds#104
  1b4:	ldr	r8, [sp, torvalds#588]
  1b8:	add	r6, r8, r6
  1bc:	ldr	r8, [sp, torvalds#580]
  1c0:	lsl	r7, r8, #2
  1c4:	ldr	r6, [r6, r7]
  1c8:	cmp	r6, #0
  1cc:	beq	0x1e8
  1d0:	mov	r8, torvalds#32
  1d4:	ldr	r6, [r6, r8]
  1d8:	add	r6, r6, torvalds#44
  1dc:	bx	r6
  1e0:	mov	r0, #0		; insn 13
  1e4:	mov	r1, #0
  1e8:	add	sp, sp, torvalds#596	; insn 14
  1ec:	pop	{r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc}

For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through
the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function,
leading to unknown behaviours.

Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not an important change. It's more a style error.

ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2021
Kconfig: document `CONFIG_WERROR` applies to Rust too
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
[ Upstream commit df5cd36 ]

When we boot a machine using a devicetree, the generic DT code goes
through all nodes with a 'device_type = "memory"' property, and collects
all memory banks mentioned there. However it does not check for the
status property, so any nodes which are explicitly "disabled" will still
be added as a memblock.
This ends up badly for QEMU, when booting with secure firmware on
arm/arm64 machines, because QEMU adds a node describing secure-only
memory:
===================
	secram@e000000 {
		secure-status = "okay";
		status = "disabled";
		reg = <0x00 0xe000000 0x00 0x1000000>;
		device_type = "memory";
	};
===================

The kernel will eventually use that memory block (which is located below
the main DRAM bank), but accesses to that will be answered with an
SError:
===================
[    0.000000] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000050 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.18.0-rc6-00014-g10c8acb8b679 torvalds#524
[    0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[    0.000000] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[    0.000000] pc : new_slab+0x190/0x340
[    0.000000] lr : new_slab+0x184/0x340
[    0.000000] sp : ffff80000a4b3d10
....
==================
The actual crash location and call stack will be somewhat random, and
depend on the specific allocation of that physical memory range.

As the DT spec[1] explicitly mentions standard properties, add a simple
check to skip over disabled memory nodes, so that we only use memory
that is meant for non-secure code to use.

That fixes booting a QEMU arm64 VM with EL3 enabled ("secure=on"), when
not using UEFI. In this case the QEMU generated DT will be handed on
to the kernel, which will see the secram node.
This issue is reproducible when using TF-A together with U-Boot as
firmware, then booting with the "booti" command.

When using U-Boot as an UEFI provider, the code there [2] explicitly
filters for disabled nodes when generating the UEFI memory map, so we
are safe.
EDK/2 only reads the first bank of the first DT memory node [3] to learn
about memory, so we got lucky there.

[1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/main/source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst#memory-node (after the table)
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/lib/fdtdec.c#L1061-1063
[3] https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/ArmVirtPkg/PrePi/FdtParser.c

Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517101410.3493781-1-andre.przywara@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
After commit 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure
of simple-battery data") we call power_supply_get_battery_info() in
__power_supply_register(), but it causes test_battery crash with NULL
pointer:

[    7.524846] __power_supply_register: Expected proper parent device for 'test_battery'
[    7.524856] CPU 3 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000278, era == 9000000002fb279c, ra == 9000000003173434
[    7.524862] Oops[#1]:
[    7.524866] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.3.0+ torvalds#524
[    7.524870] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB/Loongson-LS3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB, BIOS vUDK2018-LoongArch-V2.0.0-prebeta9 10/21/2022
[    7.524872] pc 9000000002fb279c ra 9000000003173434 tp 90000001001f0000 sp 90000001001f3c00
[    7.524875] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000000 a2 0000000000000000 a3 9000000004553e13
[    7.524878] a4 9000000004553e16 a5 ffffffffffffffff a6 9000000003fd0948 a7 0000000000000030
[    7.524881] t0 9000000003173434 t1 90000000035e2c00 t2 0000000000000001 t3 00000000fffff2b0
[    7.524883] t4 0000000000000007 t5 fffffffffffffffe t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000010
[    7.524886] t8 00000000000000b4 u0 00000001c0840c76 s9 0000000000000000 s0 0000000000000000
[    7.524889] s1 900000000370c458 s2 0000000000000001 s3 9000000101f81000 s4 9000000101f81038
[    7.524891] s5 9000000101f813a0 s6 900000000370c398 s7 9000000003eebd18 s8 90000000037c0070
[    7.524894]    ra: 9000000003173434 power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.591224]   ERA: 9000000002fb279c __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.853583]  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
[    7.859740]  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
[    7.864073]  EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE)
[    7.868839]  ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
[    7.873430] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
[    7.878884]  BADV: 0000000000000278
[    7.882346]  PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
[    7.888056] Modules linked in:
[    7.891088] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=0000000091357ee8, task=00000000313d98cb)
[    7.899307] Stack : 00000000000000b4 900000000279aca8 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[    7.907274]         0000000000000049 0000000000000408 9000000100008c00 90000000035b6370
[    7.915238]         900000000b801080 90000000029a440c 9000000003eb4680 9000000003eb4680
[    7.923202]         9000000101f81038 900000000357cdcc 0000000000000001 900000000370c458
[    7.931166]         9000000101f81000 90000000037c0070 9000000003eebd18 900000000370c398
[    7.939131]         90000000045f4530 9000000101f81038 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
[    7.947095]         900000000370c458 9000000101f81000 0000000000000000 9000000003173e64
[    7.955059]         0000000000000026 9000000003de3880 9000000100562040 900000000357e07c
[    7.963023]         000000000000026f 0000000000000001 90000001001f3d68 fffffffffffffff5
[    7.970987]         90000000036d2ca8 90000000027429d8 90000000037c0030 0000000000000001
[    7.978951]         ...
[    7.981379] Call Trace:
[    7.981382] [<9000000002fb279c>] __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.988916] [<9000000003173434>] power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.995666] [<9000000003173e64>] __power_supply_register+0x404/0x580
[    8.001984] [<900000000379d368>] test_power_init+0x6c/0x124
[    8.007527] [<90000000026e08f8>] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x1ec
[    8.013066] [<9000000003761614>] kernel_init_freeable+0x290/0x310
[    8.019127] [<90000000035b40e8>] kernel_init+0x24/0x11c
[    8.024324] [<90000000026e2048>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4
[    8.030295]
[    8.031769] Code: 4c000020  0015002c  03400000 <28c9e08c> 40000d80  02c06184  4c000020  28ca0084  4c000020

Root cause: psy->dev.parent is NULL in power_supply_get_battery_info(),
so change the else branch to be 'else if (psy->dev.parent)' and return
-ENOENT if psy->dev.parent is NULL.

Fixes: 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure of simple-battery data")
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request May 10, 2023
After commit 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure
of simple-battery data") we call power_supply_get_battery_info() in
__power_supply_register(), but it causes test_battery crash with NULL
pointer:

[    7.524846] __power_supply_register: Expected proper parent device for 'test_battery'
[    7.524856] CPU 3 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000278, era == 9000000002fb279c, ra == 9000000003173434
[    7.524862] Oops[#1]:
[    7.524866] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.3.0+ torvalds#524
[    7.524870] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB/Loongson-LS3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB, BIOS vUDK2018-LoongArch-V2.0.0-prebeta9 10/21/2022
[    7.524872] pc 9000000002fb279c ra 9000000003173434 tp 90000001001f0000 sp 90000001001f3c00
[    7.524875] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000000 a2 0000000000000000 a3 9000000004553e13
[    7.524878] a4 9000000004553e16 a5 ffffffffffffffff a6 9000000003fd0948 a7 0000000000000030
[    7.524881] t0 9000000003173434 t1 90000000035e2c00 t2 0000000000000001 t3 00000000fffff2b0
[    7.524883] t4 0000000000000007 t5 fffffffffffffffe t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000010
[    7.524886] t8 00000000000000b4 u0 00000001c0840c76 s9 0000000000000000 s0 0000000000000000
[    7.524889] s1 900000000370c458 s2 0000000000000001 s3 9000000101f81000 s4 9000000101f81038
[    7.524891] s5 9000000101f813a0 s6 900000000370c398 s7 9000000003eebd18 s8 90000000037c0070
[    7.524894]    ra: 9000000003173434 power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.591224]   ERA: 9000000002fb279c __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.853583]  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
[    7.859740]  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
[    7.864073]  EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE)
[    7.868839]  ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
[    7.873430] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
[    7.878884]  BADV: 0000000000000278
[    7.882346]  PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
[    7.888056] Modules linked in:
[    7.891088] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=0000000091357ee8, task=00000000313d98cb)
[    7.899307] Stack : 00000000000000b4 900000000279aca8 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[    7.907274]         0000000000000049 0000000000000408 9000000100008c00 90000000035b6370
[    7.915238]         900000000b801080 90000000029a440c 9000000003eb4680 9000000003eb4680
[    7.923202]         9000000101f81038 900000000357cdcc 0000000000000001 900000000370c458
[    7.931166]         9000000101f81000 90000000037c0070 9000000003eebd18 900000000370c398
[    7.939131]         90000000045f4530 9000000101f81038 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
[    7.947095]         900000000370c458 9000000101f81000 0000000000000000 9000000003173e64
[    7.955059]         0000000000000026 9000000003de3880 9000000100562040 900000000357e07c
[    7.963023]         000000000000026f 0000000000000001 90000001001f3d68 fffffffffffffff5
[    7.970987]         90000000036d2ca8 90000000027429d8 90000000037c0030 0000000000000001
[    7.978951]         ...
[    7.981379] Call Trace:
[    7.981382] [<9000000002fb279c>] __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.988916] [<9000000003173434>] power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.995666] [<9000000003173e64>] __power_supply_register+0x404/0x580
[    8.001984] [<900000000379d368>] test_power_init+0x6c/0x124
[    8.007527] [<90000000026e08f8>] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x1ec
[    8.013066] [<9000000003761614>] kernel_init_freeable+0x290/0x310
[    8.019127] [<90000000035b40e8>] kernel_init+0x24/0x11c
[    8.024324] [<90000000026e2048>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4
[    8.030295]
[    8.031769] Code: 4c000020  0015002c  03400000 <28c9e08c> 40000d80  02c06184  4c000020  28ca0084  4c000020

Root cause: psy->dev.parent is NULL in power_supply_get_battery_info(),
so change the else branch to be 'else if (psy->dev.parent)' and return
-ENOENT if psy->dev.parent is NULL.

Fixes: 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure of simple-battery data")
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
neilchetty pushed a commit to neilchetty/wsl-kernel that referenced this pull request May 28, 2023
After commit 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure
of simple-battery data") we call power_supply_get_battery_info() in
__power_supply_register(), but it causes test_battery crash with NULL
pointer:

[    7.524846] __power_supply_register: Expected proper parent device for 'test_battery'
[    7.524856] CPU 3 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000278, era == 9000000002fb279c, ra == 9000000003173434
[    7.524862] Oops[#1]:
[    7.524866] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.3.0+ torvalds#524
[    7.524870] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB/Loongson-LS3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB, BIOS vUDK2018-LoongArch-V2.0.0-prebeta9 10/21/2022
[    7.524872] pc 9000000002fb279c ra 9000000003173434 tp 90000001001f0000 sp 90000001001f3c00
[    7.524875] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000000 a2 0000000000000000 a3 9000000004553e13
[    7.524878] a4 9000000004553e16 a5 ffffffffffffffff a6 9000000003fd0948 a7 0000000000000030
[    7.524881] t0 9000000003173434 t1 90000000035e2c00 t2 0000000000000001 t3 00000000fffff2b0
[    7.524883] t4 0000000000000007 t5 fffffffffffffffe t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000010
[    7.524886] t8 00000000000000b4 u0 00000001c0840c76 s9 0000000000000000 s0 0000000000000000
[    7.524889] s1 900000000370c458 s2 0000000000000001 s3 9000000101f81000 s4 9000000101f81038
[    7.524891] s5 9000000101f813a0 s6 900000000370c398 s7 9000000003eebd18 s8 90000000037c0070
[    7.524894]    ra: 9000000003173434 power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.591224]   ERA: 9000000002fb279c __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.853583]  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
[    7.859740]  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
[    7.864073]  EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE)
[    7.868839]  ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
[    7.873430] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
[    7.878884]  BADV: 0000000000000278
[    7.882346]  PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
[    7.888056] Modules linked in:
[    7.891088] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=0000000091357ee8, task=00000000313d98cb)
[    7.899307] Stack : 00000000000000b4 900000000279aca8 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[    7.907274]         0000000000000049 0000000000000408 9000000100008c00 90000000035b6370
[    7.915238]         900000000b801080 90000000029a440c 9000000003eb4680 9000000003eb4680
[    7.923202]         9000000101f81038 900000000357cdcc 0000000000000001 900000000370c458
[    7.931166]         9000000101f81000 90000000037c0070 9000000003eebd18 900000000370c398
[    7.939131]         90000000045f4530 9000000101f81038 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
[    7.947095]         900000000370c458 9000000101f81000 0000000000000000 9000000003173e64
[    7.955059]         0000000000000026 9000000003de3880 9000000100562040 900000000357e07c
[    7.963023]         000000000000026f 0000000000000001 90000001001f3d68 fffffffffffffff5
[    7.970987]         90000000036d2ca8 90000000027429d8 90000000037c0030 0000000000000001
[    7.978951]         ...
[    7.981379] Call Trace:
[    7.981382] [<9000000002fb279c>] __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.988916] [<9000000003173434>] power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.995666] [<9000000003173e64>] __power_supply_register+0x404/0x580
[    8.001984] [<900000000379d368>] test_power_init+0x6c/0x124
[    8.007527] [<90000000026e08f8>] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x1ec
[    8.013066] [<9000000003761614>] kernel_init_freeable+0x290/0x310
[    8.019127] [<90000000035b40e8>] kernel_init+0x24/0x11c
[    8.024324] [<90000000026e2048>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4
[    8.030295]
[    8.031769] Code: 4c000020  0015002c  03400000 <28c9e08c> 40000d80  02c06184  4c000020  28ca0084  4c000020

Root cause: psy->dev.parent is NULL in power_supply_get_battery_info(),
so change the else branch to be 'else if (psy->dev.parent)' and return
-ENOENT if psy->dev.parent is NULL.

Fixes: 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure of simple-battery data")
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
sweettea pushed a commit to sweettea/btrfs-fscrypt that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
After commit 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure
of simple-battery data") we call power_supply_get_battery_info() in
__power_supply_register(), but it causes test_battery crash with NULL
pointer:

[    7.524846] __power_supply_register: Expected proper parent device for 'test_battery'
[    7.524856] CPU 3 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000278, era == 9000000002fb279c, ra == 9000000003173434
[    7.524862] Oops[kdave#1]:
[    7.524866] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.3.0+ torvalds#524
[    7.524870] Hardware name: Loongson Loongson-3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB/Loongson-LS3A5000-7A1000-1w-CRB, BIOS vUDK2018-LoongArch-V2.0.0-prebeta9 10/21/2022
[    7.524872] pc 9000000002fb279c ra 9000000003173434 tp 90000001001f0000 sp 90000001001f3c00
[    7.524875] a0 0000000000000000 a1 0000000000000000 a2 0000000000000000 a3 9000000004553e13
[    7.524878] a4 9000000004553e16 a5 ffffffffffffffff a6 9000000003fd0948 a7 0000000000000030
[    7.524881] t0 9000000003173434 t1 90000000035e2c00 t2 0000000000000001 t3 00000000fffff2b0
[    7.524883] t4 0000000000000007 t5 fffffffffffffffe t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000010
[    7.524886] t8 00000000000000b4 u0 00000001c0840c76 s9 0000000000000000 s0 0000000000000000
[    7.524889] s1 900000000370c458 s2 0000000000000001 s3 9000000101f81000 s4 9000000101f81038
[    7.524891] s5 9000000101f813a0 s6 900000000370c398 s7 9000000003eebd18 s8 90000000037c0070
[    7.524894]    ra: 9000000003173434 power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.591224]   ERA: 9000000002fb279c __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.853583]  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
[    7.859740]  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
[    7.864073]  EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE)
[    7.868839]  ECFG: 00071c1c (LIE=2-4,10-12 VS=7)
[    7.873430] ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
[    7.878884]  BADV: 0000000000000278
[    7.882346]  PRID: 0014c010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3A5000)
[    7.888056] Modules linked in:
[    7.891088] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo=0000000091357ee8, task=00000000313d98cb)
[    7.899307] Stack : 00000000000000b4 900000000279aca8 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
[    7.907274]         0000000000000049 0000000000000408 9000000100008c00 90000000035b6370
[    7.915238]         900000000b801080 90000000029a440c 9000000003eb4680 9000000003eb4680
[    7.923202]         9000000101f81038 900000000357cdcc 0000000000000001 900000000370c458
[    7.931166]         9000000101f81000 90000000037c0070 9000000003eebd18 900000000370c398
[    7.939131]         90000000045f4530 9000000101f81038 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
[    7.947095]         900000000370c458 9000000101f81000 0000000000000000 9000000003173e64
[    7.955059]         0000000000000026 9000000003de3880 9000000100562040 900000000357e07c
[    7.963023]         000000000000026f 0000000000000001 90000001001f3d68 fffffffffffffff5
[    7.970987]         90000000036d2ca8 90000000027429d8 90000000037c0030 0000000000000001
[    7.978951]         ...
[    7.981379] Call Trace:
[    7.981382] [<9000000002fb279c>] __dev_fwnode+0x8/0x20
[    7.988916] [<9000000003173434>] power_supply_get_battery_info+0xe4/0x710
[    7.995666] [<9000000003173e64>] __power_supply_register+0x404/0x580
[    8.001984] [<900000000379d368>] test_power_init+0x6c/0x124
[    8.007527] [<90000000026e08f8>] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x1ec
[    8.013066] [<9000000003761614>] kernel_init_freeable+0x290/0x310
[    8.019127] [<90000000035b40e8>] kernel_init+0x24/0x11c
[    8.024324] [<90000000026e2048>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4
[    8.030295]
[    8.031769] Code: 4c000020  0015002c  03400000 <28c9e08c> 40000d80  02c06184  4c000020  28ca0084  4c000020

Root cause: psy->dev.parent is NULL in power_supply_get_battery_info(),
so change the else branch to be 'else if (psy->dev.parent)' and return
-ENOENT if psy->dev.parent is NULL.

Fixes: 27a2195 ("power: supply: core: auto-exposure of simple-battery data")
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants