Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hover Search #198

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024
Merged

Hover Search #198

merged 14 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

Tyler-Lentz
Copy link
Contributor

@Tyler-Lentz Tyler-Lentz commented Jun 10, 2024

  • refactor config file setup
  • add config option to toggle hover search vs normal search
  • add functionality to do hover search

other things I Did

  1. Package generated paths as MissionPath, which allows a generated path to be specified as a forward flight path or a hover path where each waypoint is a place at which you should hover. This class also handles converting all of the gpscoords into the appropriate mavlink mission commands
  2. specify mavlink parameters in the config file which need to be uploaded to the plane
    • the current parameter is important because it makes sure the loiter mission items are handled in VTOL mode
  3. added an init function for Ticks, which can handle code that should be run once when the tick is first transitioned to

Copy link
Member

@atar13 atar13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. except for merge conflict

tests/integration/path_planning.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Tyler-Lentz Tyler-Lentz marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2024 04:39
@Tyler-Lentz Tyler-Lentz requested a review from atar13 June 12, 2024 04:39
@Tyler-Lentz Tyler-Lentz merged commit 006ec1e into main Jun 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@Tyler-Lentz Tyler-Lentz deleted the feat/hover_search branch June 12, 2024 04:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants