-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get ready for RC2 #2044
Get ready for RC2 #2044
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2044 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.58% 94.66% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 325 328 +3
Lines 5507 5533 +26
Branches 220 199 -21
==========================================
+ Hits 5209 5238 +29
+ Misses 298 295 -3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Awesome @LukaJCB. I can draft the blog post unless you want to. I am thinking of giving a quick overview how we get here and our commitment to compatibility and community building going forward. |
If you draft the blog post, that'd be absolutely great! Im sure we could collaborate to create a really good one! |
great I'll start one tomorrow. |
Do you want to also update the AUTHORS.md? Or I'll be happy to do that. |
Sure thing, will do! Is there a good way to find out who's a new contributor, or do I have to do it manually? :) |
I used some scala code to do that one time, and the next time I lost that code so I did manual. Not much difference in terms of time consumed. |
Alright then 😁 I've also written up something for the blog post, will you create a PR to the Typelevel blog, or should I do that? |
I am also drafting. |
also are we determined to wait for #2046? |
I think we should wait for it, yeah. If needs be, I can get it done on the weekend :) |
I'd say we set the deadline for these kinds of PRs for Monday. WDYT? :) |
7d003c0
to
643a00f
Compare
643a00f
to
a05d42f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't have a migration guide, but I think we can wait until 1.0 release.
* Add grouping to scaladoc for arity methods This makes it so when you look at the `Applicative` scaladoc you don't have a bunch of `ap3`, `ap4`, etc noise mixed in with the more meaningful methods. Instead, the generated higher-arity methods show up in separate scaladoc groups below. To see the changes you can pull this branch, run `sbt unidoc` (you may need to clean first), and open `cats/docs/target/scala-2.12/unidoc/cats/Applicative.html` in your browser. * Add doctest examples for Apply (#2086) * Get ready for RC2 (#2044) * Draft release notes * Update * Update * Update * Update * Update * Update Authors * Update * Update * Update * Update * update * Update * Update CHANGES.md * Update AUTHORS.md * Update README.md * Update deprecations to product{L,R} instead of ap{L,R}
* Setting version to 1.0.0-RC2 * Setting version to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT * Update deprecations to product{L,R} instead of ap{L,R} (#2121) * Add grouping to scaladoc for arity methods This makes it so when you look at the `Applicative` scaladoc you don't have a bunch of `ap3`, `ap4`, etc noise mixed in with the more meaningful methods. Instead, the generated higher-arity methods show up in separate scaladoc groups below. To see the changes you can pull this branch, run `sbt unidoc` (you may need to clean first), and open `cats/docs/target/scala-2.12/unidoc/cats/Applicative.html` in your browser. * Add doctest examples for Apply (#2086) * Get ready for RC2 (#2044) * Draft release notes * Update * Update * Update * Update * Update * Update Authors * Update * Update * Update * Update * update * Update * Update CHANGES.md * Update AUTHORS.md * Update README.md * Update deprecations to product{L,R} instead of ap{L,R} * Setting version to 1.0.0 * Setting version to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT * Setting version to 1.0.1 * Setting version to 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT
We're really close to 1.0, so I decided to draft some release notes. I think it'd be great if we could also get a blog post on typelevel.org in time as well. :)
Only have a couple of tickets still open:
liftF
and addliftK
to transformers standardise onliftF
and addliftK
to transformers #2033And then we have a couple of others that break bincompat so we should think about including them in 1.0.0