-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 667
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
xcelium support #1386
xcelium support #1386
Conversation
|
||
$(sim_workdir): $(sim_common_files) $(dramsim_lib) $(EXTRA_SIM_REQS) | ||
rm -rf $(model_dir) | ||
$(XCELIUM) -elaborate $(XCELIUM_OPTS) $(EXTRA_SIM_SOURCES) $(XCELIUM_COMMON_ARGS) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought elaboration and running all happened in 1 step. What is this doing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be useful to use xrun in multi-step like this if you wanted to save a snapshot.
rm -rf $(model_dir) | ||
$(XCELIUM) -elaborate $(XCELIUM_OPTS) $(EXTRA_SIM_SOURCES) $(XCELIUM_COMMON_ARGS) | ||
|
||
$(sim_run_tcl): $(sim_workdir) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you somehow inline the tcl so that you don't create an extra run tcl script?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Track this issue in #1405
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems unwise to use VCD for simulations on Chipyard-sized designs. Can you use SHM instead? Perhaps repurpose the USE_VPD
flag for fallback to VCD...
Two useful keys when used in conjunction with SHM outputs, -incsize (incremental file size for splitting waveform outputs) and -compress. |
Can we just define a new |
Handle remaining issues in #1405 |
419b4ac
to
3fc7965
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed the last few comment-related issues. Improving the overall flow will be left to future PRs.
Related PRs / Issues:
N/A
Type of change:
Impact:
Contributor Checklist:
main
as the base branch?changelog:<topic>
label?changelog:
label?.conda-lock.yml
file if you updated the conda requirements file?Please Backport
?