Support using HarnessBinders without IOBinders #1636
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes it easier to build systems with very-custom ChipTops that don't use IOBinders for whatever reason. Those ChipTops just need to instantiate a list of
Port
objects that the HarnessBinders attach to.This also enables us to breakout ChipTop I/Os into individual pins, which can help in scenarios where we do not control top-level bump names in a VLSI flow.
Related PRs / Issues:
Type of change:
Impact:
Contributor Checklist:
main
as the base branch?changelog:<topic>
label?changelog:
label?.conda-lock.yml
file if you updated the conda requirements file?Please Backport
?