Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 509: Test UCO for disjointedness of core:UcoObject and co:Collection #516

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 27, 2023

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist commented Jan 18, 2023

This Pull Request resolves backwards-compatible requirements of Issue #509 .

Coordination

  • Pull Request is in, or reverted to, Draft status before Solutions Approval vote has passed
  • CI passes in UCO feature branch against develop
  • CI passes in UCO current unstable branch (4bdb2b5)
  • CI passes in CASE current unstable branch tracking UCO's unstable as submodule (6233392)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for CASE-Examples
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for CASE-Examples (N/A)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for casework.github.io
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for casework.github.io (N/A)
  • Milestone linked
  • Solutions Approval vote logged on corresponding Issue (once logged, can be taken out of Draft PR status)

…tory

A follow-on patch will regenerate Make-managed files.

References:
* #509

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
References:
* #509

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@b0bkaT b0bkaT merged commit 8c8edb2 into develop Jan 27, 2023
ajnelson-nist added a commit to casework/CASE-Archive that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2023
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* ucoProject/UCO#514
* ucoProject/UCO#516

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist deleted the BugFix-Issue-509-1.x.0 branch March 15, 2023 20:39
ajnelson-nist added a commit to casework/CASE-Examples that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2023
No effects were observed on Make-managed files.

References:
* ucoProject/UCO#514
* ucoProject/UCO#516

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

types:Thread is one level too high in the subclass hierarchy
2 participants