Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dashboard): update feedback message for minimum length requirement #2281

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

unrenamed
Copy link
Contributor

@unrenamed unrenamed commented Oct 8, 2024

What does this PR do?

Fixes Plain SDK validation error by rejecting empty feedback messages. Updates Zod schema to specify that feedback must contain at least 20 characters.

Fixes #2256

image

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

  • Test A
    • Open the feedback form in the dashboard app
    • Leave the message textarea empty and click "Send"
    • You should expect the request to be not sent and the feedback form to be validated with the error message Feedback must contain at least 20 characters

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Ran pnpm fmt
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced validation for feedback submission, requiring a minimum of 20 characters for the message field.
    • Improved input validation for creating issues, ensuring detailed feedback is provided.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted error messages to inform users about the new character requirement for feedback.

Update Zod schema to specify that feedback must contain at least 20 characters.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 8, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 026c1f4

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
engineering ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 9, 2024 1:24pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the validation schema for the message field in both the Feedback component and the createPlainIssue procedure. The new validation requires that the message must be at least 20 characters long, ensuring users provide more detailed feedback. The structure and functionality of the components remain intact, with no changes to the FeedbackProps interface.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/dashboard/components/dashboard/feedback-component.tsx Updated validation schema for message field to require a minimum length of 20 characters.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.ts Updated input validation schema for createPlainIssue to enforce a minimum length of 20 characters for message.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Proper validation for feedback form (#2256)
Improve toast message clarity (#2256) No changes related to toast message clarity made.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mcstepp
  • chronark

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@unrenamed is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.ts (1)

15-17: Approved: Validation enhancement implemented correctly

The change successfully implements the required validation for the feedback message, addressing issue #2256. The minimum length requirement of 20 characters ensures that users provide sufficiently detailed feedback, which aligns with the PR objectives.

For future consideration:
Consider extracting the error message to a separate constant or configuration file. This would facilitate easier localization and maintenance of error messages across the application.

Example:

const ERROR_MESSAGES = {
  FEEDBACK_MIN_LENGTH: 'Feedback must contain at least 20 characters',
};

// Then in the schema:
message: z
  .string()
  .min(20, ERROR_MESSAGES.FEEDBACK_MIN_LENGTH),
apps/dashboard/components/dashboard/feedback-component.tsx (1)

51-51: Approved with suggestions for improvement

The change successfully implements the minimum length requirement for the feedback message, addressing the issue raised in #2256. The error message is clear and informative, which improves the user experience during validation.

To further enhance the code:

  1. Consider extracting the minimum length as a constant for better maintainability:
const MIN_FEEDBACK_LENGTH = 20;

// Then in the schema:
message: z.string().min(MIN_FEEDBACK_LENGTH, `Feedback must contain at least ${MIN_FEEDBACK_LENGTH} characters`),
  1. You might want to add a maximum length constraint to prevent excessively long messages:
const MAX_FEEDBACK_LENGTH = 1000; // Adjust as needed

message: z.string()
  .min(MIN_FEEDBACK_LENGTH, `Feedback must contain at least ${MIN_FEEDBACK_LENGTH} characters`)
  .max(MAX_FEEDBACK_LENGTH, `Feedback must not exceed ${MAX_FEEDBACK_LENGTH} characters`),

These suggestions will make the code more maintainable and provide a better user experience by setting clear boundaries for the feedback length.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00213c6 and 75ac01b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/dashboard/components/dashboard/feedback-component.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/plain.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/dashboard/components/dashboard/feedback-component.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-190: Verify form submission handling

The schema change looks good, but let's ensure that the form submission handling in the component correctly uses this updated schema.

Please run the following script to check the form submission logic:

This will help us confirm that the form submission logic correctly uses the updated schema, ensuring that the minimum length requirement is enforced when the user submits the form.

✅ Verification successful

[/run_scripts]


Verified: Form submission handling correctly implements the updated schema.

All form submissions in feedback-component.tsx utilize the updated schema with the minimum length requirement for the message field. The integration with zodResolver ensures that validations are enforced as intended.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify form submission handling

# Test: Check if the form submission logic uses the updated schema
rg --type typescript 'form\.handleSubmit' apps/dashboard/components/dashboard/feedback-component.tsx -A 10

Length of output: 143


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify form submission handling with corrected file type search

# Test: Check if the form submission logic uses the updated schema by searching .ts and .tsx files
rg 'form\.handleSubmit' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' apps/dashboard/components/dashboard/feedback-component.tsx -A 10

Length of output: 452

@chronark chronark merged commit b68e117 into unkeyed:main Oct 9, 2024
4 of 8 checks passed
Copy link

oss-gg bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Awarding unrenamed: 150 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/unrenamed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

proper validation for feedback form
2 participants