Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checkbox that actually can be made read-only #404

Closed
vaadin-miki opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #405
Closed

Checkbox that actually can be made read-only #404

vaadin-miki opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #405
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@vaadin-miki
Copy link
Owner

vaadin-miki commented Sep 14, 2022

The fact that Checkbox cannot be made properly read-only leads to some weird situations, like an entire layout becoming suddenly not-read-only after a checkbox contained within it was clicked. More information in vaadin/web-components#688

Introduce an improved Checkbox that can be made read-only such that it synchronises the state with enabledness.

@vaadin-miki vaadin-miki added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 14, 2022
@vaadin-miki vaadin-miki added this to the Next release milestone Sep 14, 2022
@vaadin-miki vaadin-miki self-assigned this Sep 14, 2022
vaadin-miki added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2022
vaadin-miki added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2022
fixed layout bugs, added SuperCheckbox
vaadin-miki added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2022
* #400 #406 #408 #402 #403 #404 done (#405)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: vaadin-miki <vaadin-miki@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant