Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Increase test coverage #12

Open
thomas-fossati opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Increase test coverage #12

thomas-fossati opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@thomas-fossati
Copy link
Contributor

thomas-fossati commented Feb 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

This is an open ticket to track improvements in test coverage.
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 19, 2021
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati changed the title BUG: Increase test coverage Feb 19, 2021
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Feb 19, 2021
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2021
@thomas-fossati
千里之行，始於足下
4f9266b 
In the spirit of #12
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati mentioned this issue Feb 19, 2021
Merged
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2021
@thomas-fossati
千里之行，始於足下 (#13)
7b75bca 
In the spirit of #12
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.
8db66de 
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.  Besides, given that the type of
the byte array is well defined and it has a known string representation,
allow it in XML and JSON serialisations.

Also, increase test coverage (partially addressing #12)

Fixes #18
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2021
Merged
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.
0645a02 
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.  Besides, given that the type of
the byte array is well defined and it has a known string representation,
allow it in XML and JSON serialisations.

Also, increase test coverage (partially addressing #12)

Fixes #18
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.
2c0bbfe 
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.  Besides, given that the type of
the byte array is well defined and it has a known string representation,
allow it in XML and JSON serialisations.

Also, increase test coverage (partially addressing #12)

Fixes #18
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID. (#19)
d96adca 
Validate the tag-id byte array as UUID.  Besides, given that the type of
the byte array is well defined and it has a known string representation,
allow it in XML and JSON serialisations.

Also, increase test coverage (partially addressing #12)

Fixes #18
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Improve hash-entry implementation
78d91b9 
1. make the algorithm identifiers visible to dependent packages
2. check compatibility of algID and hashValue on Set so that we cannot
   end up in an unwanted state

Fixes #20

Also, improve coverage - therefore partially addressing #12.
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2021
Merged
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Improve hash-entry implementation
6f45b2d 
1. make the algorithm identifiers visible to dependent packages
2. check compatibility of algID and hashValue on Set so that we cannot
   end up in an unwanted state

Fixes #20

Also, improve coverage - therefore partially addressing #12.
thomas-fossati added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2021
@thomas-fossati
Improve hash-entry implementation
66b8f00 
1. make the algorithm identifiers visible to dependent packages
2. check compatibility of algID and hashValue on Set so that we cannot
   end up in an unwanted state

Fixes #20

Also, improve coverage - therefore partially addressing #12.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@thomas-fossati