Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

motion methods should use ShortName() #1560

Conversation

biotinker
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@biotinker biotinker added the safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone label Nov 4, 2022
@viambot viambot added safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone and removed safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone labels Nov 4, 2022
@edaniels
Copy link
Contributor

edaniels commented Nov 4, 2022

shouldn't we update other parts to accept a full name? short name is riskier

@biotinker
Copy link
Member Author

@edaniels Isn't that functionally what this is doing? Counterintuitively, Name yields just the name of the thing, while ShortName yields remote+name, which is how it is in the framesystem (that counterintuitiveness is the cause of this bug).

The only information that's not captured in ShortName is the subtype, but we shouldn't care about that for framesystem stuff, since ShortName should always be unique in a robot.

@biotinker biotinker changed the title motion GetPose should use ShortName() motion methods should use ShortName() Nov 4, 2022
@edaniels
Copy link
Contributor

edaniels commented Nov 4, 2022

there's the .String() which is the fully qualified name with all remotes involved

@biotinker
Copy link
Member Author

.String() is subtype/remote:component, whereas ShortName is just remote:component.

Remote:component is what the framesystem uses, so that's what should be used here.

If we want the framesystem to use subtype/remote:component I'm not opposed to that but that should be coordinated with the RDK Components team, and also we probably shouldn't block this PR on that; this will fix the system as it currently exists, and that would be an improvement that re-updating this would be a part of.

Copy link
Contributor

@Fahmina Fahmina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@bhaney bhaney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yay short name

@viambot viambot added safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone and removed safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone labels Nov 4, 2022
@edaniels
Copy link
Contributor

edaniels commented Nov 7, 2022

ah, yes. my bad!

@viambot viambot added safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone and removed safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone labels Nov 7, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2022

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Delta Health
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm 59% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/universalrobots 12% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/xarm 2% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/yahboom 7% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/audioinput 55% -0.34%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base 68% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/agilex 62% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/boat 41% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/wheeled 76% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board 69% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/arduino 10% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/commonsysfs 47% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/fake 39% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/numato 19% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/pi 50% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera 66% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/fake 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/ffmpeg 72% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/transformpipeline 80% +0.40%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/videosource 55% -0.48%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/encoder/fake 77% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry 68% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry/multiaxis 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry/oneaxis 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/generic 84% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gripper 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input/gpio 83% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/dimensionengineering 63% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/dmc4000 69% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/fake 58% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/gpio 64% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/gpiostepper 56% -0.59%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/tmcstepper 62% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/cameramono 40% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/gpsnmea 37% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/gpsrtk 28% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/posetracker 88% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/sensor 88% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/sensor/ultrasonic 34% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/components/servo 77% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/config 77% -0.08%
go.viam.com/rdk/control 57% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/data 78% +0.81%
go.viam.com/rdk/grpc 25% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/ml 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/ml/inference 70% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/motionplan 71% +2.12%
go.viam.com/rdk/operation 81% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/pointcloud 71% +0.09%
go.viam.com/rdk/protoutils 62% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/referenceframe 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/registry 88% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/resource 85% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/depthadapter 94% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/transform 73% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/transform/cmd/extrinsic_calibration 67% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot 93% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/client 80% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/framesystem 68% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/impl 79% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/server 58% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/web 61% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/web/stream 87% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/armremotecontrol 75% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/armremotecontrol/builtin 25% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/baseremotecontrol 75% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/baseremotecontrol/builtin 71% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager 62% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/builtin 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/datacapture 21% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/datasync 72% +0.29%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/motion 68% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/motion/builtin 89% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/navigation 54% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/sensors 78% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/sensors/builtin 97% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/shell 15% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam 86% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/builtin 73% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/vision 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/services/vision/builtin 74% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/spatialmath 85% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/subtype 96% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/utils 71% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision 26% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/chess 80% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/delaunay 87% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/keypoints 92% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/objectdetection 82% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/odometry 60% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/odometry/cmd 0% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/segmentation 49% 0.00%
go.viam.com/rdk/web/server 26% 0.00%
Summary 66% (19254 / 29111) +0.13%

@biotinker biotinker merged commit 0a25c4d into viamrobotics:main Nov 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants