Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make missing rpc client registration fail with more verbose message #1661

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

Make missing rpc client registration fail with more verbose message #1661

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2022

Conversation

ermik
Copy link
Contributor

@ermik ermik commented Dec 12, 2022

When circumventing the FromRobot(r) helpers, like one may do if they are new to the RDK, the likely result of trying to address any one of r.ResourceNames is going to lead to the ErrMissingClientRegistration. If said soul is familiar with Go own flavor of DI package registration it's easy to find the x/register packages (and probably the helpers in the process). However a slight nudge never hurt anyone?

@ermik
Dev experience: missing client registration debug
570763f 
When circumventing the FromRobot(r) helpers, like one may do if they
are new to the RDK, the likely result of trying to address any one of
r.ResourceNames is going to lead to the ErrMissingClientRegistration.
If said soul is familiar with Go own flavor of DI package registration
it's easy to find the x/register packages (and probably the helpers in
the process). However a slight nudge never hurt anyone.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 12, 2022 •
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

stuqdog
stuqdog reviewed Dec 14, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@stuqdog stuqdog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @ermik! Thanks so much for making this change. One minor nitpick but in general this looks good :)

robot/client/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@stuqdog stuqdog added the safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone label Dec 14, 2022
@ermik @stuqdog
Dev experience: remove unnecessary comment
a5435e0 
Co-authored-by: Ethan <ethan@viam.com>
@viambot viambot removed the safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone label Dec 16, 2022
@ermik ermik requested a review from stuqdog December 16, 2022 13:28
@edaniels edaniels added the safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone label Dec 16, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Delta Health
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm 61% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/universalrobots 13% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/xarm 2% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/arm/yahboom 7% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/audioinput 55% +0.34% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base 67% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/agilex 62% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/boat 41% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/base/wheeled 76% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board 68% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/arduino 10% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/commonsysfs 47% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/fake 38% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/numato 19% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/board/pi 50% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera 65% -0.26% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/fake 67% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/ffmpeg 77% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/transformpipeline 78% +0.66% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/camera/videosource 56% +0.51% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/encoder/fake 77% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry 68% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry/multiaxis 84% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gantry/oneaxis 86% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/generic 83% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/gripper 80% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input 87% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/input/gpio 84% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor 81% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/dimensionengineering 63% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/dmc4000 69% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/fake 57% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/gpio 64% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/gpiostepper 56% -0.59% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/motor/tmcstepper 62% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor 75% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/cameramono 40% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/gpsnmea 37% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/movementsensor/gpsrtk 28% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/posetracker 86% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/sensor 86% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/sensor/ultrasonic 34% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/components/servo 78% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/components/servo/gpio 71% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/config 77% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/control 57% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/data 77% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/grpc 25% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/ml 67% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/ml/inference 70% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/motionplan 59% -8.67% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/octree 93% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/operation 82% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/pointcloud 71% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/protoutils 59% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/referenceframe 71% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/registry 90% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/resource 83% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage 78% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/depthadapter 94% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/transform 73% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/rimage/transform/cmd/extrinsic_calibration 67% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/robot 85% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/client 82% -0.16% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/framesystem 68% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/impl 81% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/server 57% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/web 60% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/robot/web/stream 87% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/armremotecontrol 71% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/armremotecontrol/builtin 52% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/services/baseremotecontrol 71% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/baseremotecontrol/builtin 79% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager 65% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/builtin 80% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/datacapture 21% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/services/datamanager/datasync 72% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/motion 63% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/services/motion/builtin 88% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/navigation 54% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/services/sensors 77% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/sensors/builtin 97% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/shell 14% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam 84% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/slam/builtin 72% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/vision 80% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/services/vision/builtin 74% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/session 97% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/spatialmath 85% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/subtype 96% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/utils 72% +0.18% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/vision 26% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/chess 80% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/delaunay 87% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/keypoints 92% 0.00% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/objectdetection 82% +6.94% ✅
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/odometry 60% 0.00% ➖
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/odometry/cmd 0% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/vision/segmentation 49% 0.00% ❌
go.viam.com/rdk/web/server 26% 0.00% ❌
Summary 66% (20214 / 30646) -0.49% ➖

@edaniels edaniels changed the title Developer experience: make missing clients fail more verbose Make missing rpc client registration fail with more verbose message Dec 16, 2022
stuqdog
stuqdog approved these changes Dec 16, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@stuqdog stuqdog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@stuqdog stuqdog merged commit 63a601c into viamrobotics:main Dec 16, 2022
@bazile-clyde bazile-clyde mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stuqdog stuqdog stuqdog approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
safe to test This pull request is marked safe to test from a trusted zone
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@ermik @CLAassistant @stuqdog @edaniels @viambot