Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update index.js and test.js to add pronunciation support #17

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2019
Merged

Update index.js and test.js to add pronunciation support #17

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2019

Conversation

rawr51919
Copy link

@rawr51919 rawr51919 commented Mar 21, 2019

Updates index.js to add support for pronunciation (say, for Pinyin in Chinese) (carryover from unmaintained upstream PR matheuss#61).

Updates index.js to add support for pronunciation (say, for Pinyin in Chinese)
Updates test.js to add in a test case for the pronunciation support.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 21, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #17 into master will increase coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #17      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.42%   92.64%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines          66       68       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits           61       63       +2     
  Misses          5        5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
index.js 90.56% <100%> (+0.36%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 541d4fb...4eb65a1. Read the comment docs.

@rawr51919 rawr51919 changed the title Update index.js to add pronunciation support Update index.js and test.js to add pronunciation support Mar 21, 2019
index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Update index.js as per vitalets' suggestion
@vitalets
Copy link
Owner

vitalets commented Apr 1, 2019

👍
I think you can also add this feature to why this fork section in readme to let people know about it!

@rawr51919
Copy link
Author

rawr51919 commented Apr 1, 2019

Ye. That'd be a good idea. EDIT: Done.

Update the readme as per vitalets' suggestion
@vitalets vitalets merged commit 6bb904a into vitalets:master Apr 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants