Skip to content

Conversation

@Yikun
Copy link
Collaborator

@Yikun Yikun commented Jul 6, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it?

Use base test to avoid patch everwhere.

Followup here: #1566

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

ut ci passed

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.24%. Comparing base (33e1ea4) to head (84c5731).
⚠️ Report is 544 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1634      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.25%   60.24%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines        8006     8004       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         4824     4822       -2     
  Misses       3182     3182              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 60.24% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Yikun Yikun requested a review from wangxiyuan July 6, 2025 07:33
@Yikun Yikun added the ready read for review label Jul 6, 2025
class TestSimpleBuffer(TestBase):

def setUp(self):
self.pipe = MockSimplePipe()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if the supper.setup is needed here.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Yikun Yikun Jul 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will confirm soon, I think yes

@github-actions github-actions bot added merge-conflicts and removed ready read for review labels Jul 15, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
@wangxiyuan wangxiyuan merged commit 5f0b42e into vllm-project:main Jul 22, 2025
14 checks passed
chopper0126 pushed a commit to chopper0126/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use base test to avoid patch everwhere.

Followup here: vllm-project#1566

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
ut ci passed

- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@8d0a01a

Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Angazenn pushed a commit to Angazenn/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use base test to avoid patch everwhere.

Followup here: vllm-project#1566

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
ut ci passed

- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@8d0a01a

Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants