Skip to content

Conversation

@yiz-liu
Copy link
Collaborator

@yiz-liu yiz-liu commented Jul 26, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it?

Pre-transpose MoE weights for improved performance

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

None.

How was this patch tested?

No further test needed.

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2025

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

@wangxiyuan
Copy link
Collaborator

please rebase to fix the merge conflict if this PR is still needed.

@yiz-liu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yiz-liu commented Aug 28, 2025

Implemented in #2614 .

@yiz-liu yiz-liu deleted the pre-transpose branch August 28, 2025 12:13
wangxiyuan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2025
… Graph (#2614)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
* **Unify execution paths:** Consolidates the quantized and
non-quantized execution paths into a single `fused_experts` function,
removing duplicated logic and making the control flow clearer and easier
to maintain.
* **W8A8 dynamic quantization:** Adds support for W8A8 dynamic
quantization inside the unified MoE kernel. Communication routines are
updated to correctly handle dynamic quantization scales for activations.
* **Weight pre-processing:** Prae-transpose the `w13` and `w2` weight
matrices (as implemented in PR #2025) so that quantized and
non-quantized models follow the same code path for the MoE gating,
up-projection, and down-projection operations.
* **All-to-all communication:** Adds an `all-to-all` collective
communication pattern. For large token counts on modern hardware,
`all-to-all` is more efficient than the previous `all-gather` strategy.
However, `all-to-all` is not really captured and replayed due to
multiple D2H operations which will trigger synchronization, and thus
raise error when capture graphs. We only use `all-to-all` when fallback
to `compiled_graph_for_general_shape`.
* **Dynamic communication selection:** The model runner now selects the
optimal MoE communication method (`mc2`, `allgather`, or `alltoall`) at
runtime based on token count and the Ascend SoC version.
* **Limitation:** `all-gather` is not yet supported for quantized
models, which means there is still something left to do on A2.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.

### How was this patch tested?
No further test cases needed.

- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d660c98

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
wenba0 pushed a commit to wenba0/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
… Graph (vllm-project#2614)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
* **Unify execution paths:** Consolidates the quantized and
non-quantized execution paths into a single `fused_experts` function,
removing duplicated logic and making the control flow clearer and easier
to maintain.
* **W8A8 dynamic quantization:** Adds support for W8A8 dynamic
quantization inside the unified MoE kernel. Communication routines are
updated to correctly handle dynamic quantization scales for activations.
* **Weight pre-processing:** Prae-transpose the `w13` and `w2` weight
matrices (as implemented in PR vllm-project#2025) so that quantized and
non-quantized models follow the same code path for the MoE gating,
up-projection, and down-projection operations.
* **All-to-all communication:** Adds an `all-to-all` collective
communication pattern. For large token counts on modern hardware,
`all-to-all` is more efficient than the previous `all-gather` strategy.
However, `all-to-all` is not really captured and replayed due to
multiple D2H operations which will trigger synchronization, and thus
raise error when capture graphs. We only use `all-to-all` when fallback
to `compiled_graph_for_general_shape`.
* **Dynamic communication selection:** The model runner now selects the
optimal MoE communication method (`mc2`, `allgather`, or `alltoall`) at
runtime based on token count and the Ascend SoC version.
* **Limitation:** `all-gather` is not yet supported for quantized
models, which means there is still something left to do on A2.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.

### How was this patch tested?
No further test cases needed.

- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d660c98

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: lijiaojiao <lijiaojiao990304@163.com>
wangxiaoteng888 pushed a commit to LCAIZJ/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2025
… Graph (vllm-project#2614)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
* **Unify execution paths:** Consolidates the quantized and
non-quantized execution paths into a single `fused_experts` function,
removing duplicated logic and making the control flow clearer and easier
to maintain.
* **W8A8 dynamic quantization:** Adds support for W8A8 dynamic
quantization inside the unified MoE kernel. Communication routines are
updated to correctly handle dynamic quantization scales for activations.
* **Weight pre-processing:** Prae-transpose the `w13` and `w2` weight
matrices (as implemented in PR vllm-project#2025) so that quantized and
non-quantized models follow the same code path for the MoE gating,
up-projection, and down-projection operations.
* **All-to-all communication:** Adds an `all-to-all` collective
communication pattern. For large token counts on modern hardware,
`all-to-all` is more efficient than the previous `all-gather` strategy.
However, `all-to-all` is not really captured and replayed due to
multiple D2H operations which will trigger synchronization, and thus
raise error when capture graphs. We only use `all-to-all` when fallback
to `compiled_graph_for_general_shape`.
* **Dynamic communication selection:** The model runner now selects the
optimal MoE communication method (`mc2`, `allgather`, or `alltoall`) at
runtime based on token count and the Ascend SoC version.
* **Limitation:** `all-gather` is not yet supported for quantized
models, which means there is still something left to do on A2.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.

### How was this patch tested?
No further test cases needed.

- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d660c98

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
chopper0126 pushed a commit to chopper0126/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
… Graph (vllm-project#2614)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
* **Unify execution paths:** Consolidates the quantized and
non-quantized execution paths into a single `fused_experts` function,
removing duplicated logic and making the control flow clearer and easier
to maintain.
* **W8A8 dynamic quantization:** Adds support for W8A8 dynamic
quantization inside the unified MoE kernel. Communication routines are
updated to correctly handle dynamic quantization scales for activations.
* **Weight pre-processing:** Prae-transpose the `w13` and `w2` weight
matrices (as implemented in PR vllm-project#2025) so that quantized and
non-quantized models follow the same code path for the MoE gating,
up-projection, and down-projection operations.
* **All-to-all communication:** Adds an `all-to-all` collective
communication pattern. For large token counts on modern hardware,
`all-to-all` is more efficient than the previous `all-gather` strategy.
However, `all-to-all` is not really captured and replayed due to
multiple D2H operations which will trigger synchronization, and thus
raise error when capture graphs. We only use `all-to-all` when fallback
to `compiled_graph_for_general_shape`.
* **Dynamic communication selection:** The model runner now selects the
optimal MoE communication method (`mc2`, `allgather`, or `alltoall`) at
runtime based on token count and the Ascend SoC version.
* **Limitation:** `all-gather` is not yet supported for quantized
models, which means there is still something left to do on A2.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.

### How was this patch tested?
No further test cases needed.

- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d660c98

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Angazenn pushed a commit to Angazenn/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
… Graph (vllm-project#2614)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
* **Unify execution paths:** Consolidates the quantized and
non-quantized execution paths into a single `fused_experts` function,
removing duplicated logic and making the control flow clearer and easier
to maintain.
* **W8A8 dynamic quantization:** Adds support for W8A8 dynamic
quantization inside the unified MoE kernel. Communication routines are
updated to correctly handle dynamic quantization scales for activations.
* **Weight pre-processing:** Prae-transpose the `w13` and `w2` weight
matrices (as implemented in PR vllm-project#2025) so that quantized and
non-quantized models follow the same code path for the MoE gating,
up-projection, and down-projection operations.
* **All-to-all communication:** Adds an `all-to-all` collective
communication pattern. For large token counts on modern hardware,
`all-to-all` is more efficient than the previous `all-gather` strategy.
However, `all-to-all` is not really captured and replayed due to
multiple D2H operations which will trigger synchronization, and thus
raise error when capture graphs. We only use `all-to-all` when fallback
to `compiled_graph_for_general_shape`.
* **Dynamic communication selection:** The model runner now selects the
optimal MoE communication method (`mc2`, `allgather`, or `alltoall`) at
runtime based on token count and the Ascend SoC version.
* **Limitation:** `all-gather` is not yet supported for quantized
models, which means there is still something left to do on A2.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.

### How was this patch tested?
No further test cases needed.

- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d660c98

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants