-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.1k
[Fix] bump mistral common to support magistral #19533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: 汪志鹏 <wangzhipeng628@gmail.com>
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @princepride, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses issue #19495 by updating the required version of the mistral_common dependency. This change ensures compatibility or leverages new features/fixes available in version 1.6.0 of the library.
Highlights
- Dependency Update: Updated the
mistral_common[opencv]dependency version from>= 1.5.4to>= 1.6.0in both the common and test requirements files.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request updates the mistral_common[opencv] dependency from version >=1.5.4 to >=1.6.0 in requirements/common.txt and requirements/test.in. I've suggested considering a more precise version pin (e.g., ==1.6.0) for mistral_common to enhance stability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the contribution. Could you paste the test plan (such as verifying the issue is fixed)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, this makes sense to me, but can you update the description of the PR with the image you provided, following the default PR format?
Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, currently unable to use Magistral because of this
@houseroad Some unit test failed. What should I do? |
|
@princepride The test_pixtral.py file probable needs to be updated. Here's the PR for v11 from mistral_common https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-common/pull/91/files |
That's weird. I checked this PR, it sames the pixtral tokenizer mapping didn't make any change, and I checked the source code, the |
|
@houseroad 😓 seems it's a bug in mistral_common==1.6.0: mistralai/mistral-common#94 |
|
@princepride Hopefully they fix it quickly |
|
Nice catch with the data folder - that's indeed needed for the tests. Fixing now. Should be done in 1h |
requirements/common.txt
Outdated
| gguf >= 0.13.0 | ||
| importlib_metadata; python_version < '3.10' | ||
| mistral_common[opencv] >= 1.5.4 | ||
| mistral_common[opencv] >= 1.6.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| mistral_common[opencv] >= 1.6.0 | |
| mistral_common[opencv] >= 1.6.2 |
|
Let's update the version and re-trigger the tests :-) |
|
Sorry about that - we should have read the uv docs better before switching 😅 |
Signed-off-by: 汪志鹏 <wangzhipeng628@gmail.com>
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
@houseroad Hmm, that's weird, the Unit test failed, it seems not a problem of my code. |
|
The failed test shouldn't be related. |
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
@patrickvonplaten @patrickvonplaten Even with this Similar issue reported here: https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Magistral-Small-2506/discussions/15 |



Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
Purpose
Test Plan
vllm serve mistralai/Magistral-Small-2506 --tokenizer_mode mistral --config_format mistral --load_format mistral --tool-call-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choiceTest Result