Merge release/v1.0.0 to develop
#4858
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications across multiple files, focusing on enhancing the structure and handling of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
* render summary fields in modal sidebar * lint log * fix urls * e2e summary fields * e2e fixes
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/modal-sidebar.ts (1)
129-139: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling and type safety.The
verifyObjectmethod is well-implemented and enhances theSidebarAsserterclass's functionality. It correctly verifies multiple key-value pairs in the sidebar.Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling for cases where the sidebar entry or key-value pairs are not found.
- Enhance type safety by using a more specific type for the
objparameter.Here's a suggested implementation with these improvements:
async verifyObject(key: string, obj: Record<string, string>) { const locator = this.modalSidebarPom.getSidebarEntry(key); for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(obj)) { const entry = locator.getByTestId(`key-value-${k}-${v}`); try { await expect(entry.getByTestId(`key-${k}`)).toHaveText(k); await expect(entry.getByTestId(`value-${v}`)).toHaveText(v); } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to verify key-value pair ${k}:${v} in sidebar entry ${key}: ${error.message}`); } } }This implementation:
- Uses
Record<string, string>for better type safety.- Uses
Object.entries()for cleaner iteration.- Adds a try-catch block to provide more informative error messages.
e2e-pw/src/oss/specs/smoke-tests/summary-fields.spec.ts (1)
26-26: Unnecessary use of f-string in Python code.The
fprefix is not needed for the static string"image.png". Removing it improves code clarity.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- filepath=f"image.png", + filepath="image.png",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/packages/core/src/components/Sidebar/Entries/PathValueEntry.tsx (10 hunks)
- app/packages/state/src/recoil/schema.ts (2 hunks)
- app/packages/utilities/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
- e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/modal-sidebar.ts (1 hunks)
- e2e-pw/src/oss/specs/smoke-tests/summary-fields.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
app/packages/core/src/components/Sidebar/Entries/PathValueEntry.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/state/src/recoil/schema.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/utilities/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/modal-sidebar.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.e2e-pw/src/oss/specs/smoke-tests/summary-fields.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (17)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/schema.ts (1)
789-793: Improved robustness and accuracy inisOfDocumentFieldListselectorThe changes to the
isOfDocumentFieldListselectorFamily enhance its functionality and reliability:
- Extracting the parent path using
slice(0, -1)is more accurate for nested paths.- The check for an empty parent path prevents potential errors when dealing with top-level fields.
- Using
get(field(parent))ensures we're checking the correct field type for nested structures.These improvements align with best practices for handling nested data structures and make the function more robust.
e2e-pw/src/oss/specs/smoke-tests/summary-fields.spec.ts (4)
6-13: Fixtures are correctly extended with grid and modal.The test setup appropriately extends the base fixtures to include
gridandmodal, ensuring they are available in the test context.
15-16: Dataset name is uniquely generated to prevent conflicts.Using
getUniqueDatasetNameWithPrefixensures that the dataset name is unique, avoiding potential naming collisions during parallel test executions.
17-42: Test setup correctly initializes the dataset with the required fields.The
beforeAllhook efficiently sets up a persistent dataset with the necessary samples and sidebar configurations, providing a reliable environment for the tests.
44-70: Test case effectively verifies rendering of summary fields in the modal sidebar.The test accurately opens a sample, expands the necessary fields, and asserts the presence of the expected data in the modal sidebar.
app/packages/core/src/components/Sidebar/Entries/PathValueEntry.tsx (10)
3-8: Imported modules are appropriate and used correctlyThe newly added imports from "@fiftyone/utilities" include necessary types and functions (
Primitive,Schema,EMBEDDED_DOCUMENT_FIELD,formatPrimitive,makePseudoField) that are utilized in the code. This aligns with best practices for modularity and code reuse.
59-62: Added styling for anchor (<a>) elementsThe inclusion of CSS styles for anchor tags ensures that links within the component adhere to the theme's primary text color, enhancing visual consistency.
128-130: Enhanced layout with flex propertiesApplying
display: flex,flex-direction: column, androw-gapimproves the layout of list items by ensuring proper spacing and alignment. This enhances the readability and overall user experience.
241-257: Correctly fetching and formatting list dataThe code appropriately retrieves data using the
useDatahook and utilizes theformatfunction to process each value in the list. TheuseMemohook is correctly used to memoize the formatted values, and the dependency array is accurate.
382-390: Consistent use offormatfunction with correct dependenciesThe use of
useMemoto memoize the formatted value is appropriate. The dependencies[fields, ftype, timeZone, value]ensure that the memoized value updates correctly when any of these variables change.
503-507: Securely handle URLs in rendered contentRendering URLs directly without validation can pose security risks such as open redirects or injection attacks. Ensure that the
resultis a trusted URL or is properly sanitized before rendering it within an anchor tag.[security]
Consider validating the URL or restricting it to known safe domains:
return result instanceof URL ? ( <a href={result.toString()} target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"> {result.toString()} </a> ) : ( result );Ensure that
result.toString()does not include any malicious content.
200-200:⚠️ Potential issueFix syntax error in template literal for
data-cyattributeThe
data-cyattribute has an unmatched curly brace and missing closing backtick, which will cause a syntax error. Ensure that the template literal is properly closed.Apply this diff to fix the syntax:
- data-cy={`sidebar-field-arrow-enabled-${path}} + data-cy={`sidebar-field-arrow-enabled-${path}`}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
395-395:⚠️ Potential issueFix syntax error in template literal for
data-cyattributeSimilar to the issue on line 200, there's an unmatched curly brace and missing closing backtick in the
data-cyattribute.Apply this diff to correct the syntax:
- data-cy={`sidebar-entry-${path}} + data-cy={`sidebar-entry-${path}`}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
471-546:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure correct string interpolation in
data-cyattributesIn the
formatObjectfunction, thedata-cyattributes use single quotes with template literals, which prevents proper string interpolation. This results in incorrect attribute values.Update the
data-cyattributes to use backticks for template literals:- data-cy={'key-value-${k}-${text}'} + data-cy={`key-value-${k}-${text}`}- <span data-cy={'key-${k}'}>{k}</span> + <span data-cy={`key-${k}`}>{k}</span>- <span data-cy={'value-${text}'}>{text}</span> + <span data-cy={`value-${text}`}>{text}</span>This ensures that the
data-cyattributes have the correct values for testing and debugging purposes.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint
312-323: Formatting values withoutfieldsparameterIn the
SlicesLoadablecomponent, theformatfunction is called without thefieldsparameter. Iffieldsare necessary for accurate formatting, consider passing them to the function. Otherwise, ensure that theformatfunction can handle cases wherefieldsisundefined.Run this script to check if
fieldsare required for formatting in this context:app/packages/utilities/src/index.ts (2)
6-6: Export statement correctly addedThe export statement for
"./Resource"has been appropriately added, ensuring that theResourcemodule is available for use in other parts of the application.
621-626: Definition ofPrimitivetype enhances type safetyThe introduction of the
Primitivetype encompassingnumber,null,string,undefined, and{ datetime: number }accurately represents the expected input types for theformatPrimitivefunction, improving type safety and code clarity.
| const entryExpandPromise = eventUtils.getEventReceivedPromiseForPredicate( | ||
| "animation-onRest", | ||
| () => true | ||
| ); | ||
| await modal.sidebar.clickFieldDropdown("summaries"); | ||
| await entryExpandPromise; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refine the event predicate function to enhance test reliability.
The predicate function () => true in getEventReceivedPromiseForPredicate will always return true, which may not effectively wait for the specific event. Consider specifying a more precise predicate to ensure the promise resolves when the intended event occurs.
Apply this diff to refine the predicate function:
const entryExpandPromise = eventUtils.getEventReceivedPromiseForPredicate(
"animation-onRest",
- () => true
+ (event) => event.targetField === "summaries"
);Replace (event) => event.targetField === "summaries" with the appropriate condition that matches the event data structure to accurately capture the expansion of the "summaries" field.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| <div key={i.toString()}>{prettify(value as string)}</div> | ||
| ))} | ||
| {(!data || !data.length) && <>No results</>} | ||
| {(!data || !data.length) && "No results"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid unsafe type assertion when calling prettify
The value is being cast to string using as string, but value may not always be a string, which could lead to runtime errors if value is null or of a different type.
Consider modifying the code to safely handle different value types:
- <div key={i.toString()}>{prettify(value as string)}</div>
+ <div key={i.toString()}>{prettify(String(value))}</div>This change ensures that value is converted to a string without risking a type assertion error.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div key={i.toString()}>{prettify(value as string)}</div> | |
| ))} | |
| {(!data || !data.length) && <>No results</>} | |
| {(!data || !data.length) && "No results"} | |
| <div key={i.toString()}>{prettify(String(value))}</div> | |
| ))} | |
| {(!data || !data.length) && "No results"} |
| // @ts-ignore | ||
| return prettify(value); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure correct typing for prettify function
On lines 650-651, value is passed to the prettify function with a @ts-ignore comment. To maintain type safety, adjust the types to ensure compatibility without suppressing the type checker.
Modify the call to prettify by ensuring value matches the expected input type:
-// @ts-ignore
return prettify(value);If prettify accepts the same types as Primitive, consider updating its type definitions accordingly. Alternatively, cast value to an acceptable type if safe to do so.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| value: Primitive; | ||
| }) => { | ||
| if (value === null || value === undefined) return undefined; | ||
| if (value === null || value === undefined) return null; | ||
|
|
||
| switch (ftype) { | ||
| case FRAME_SUPPORT_FIELD: | ||
| value = `[${value[0]}, ${value[1]}]`; | ||
| break; | ||
| return `[${value[0]}, ${value[1]}]`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Type inconsistency: value treated as an array but not typed accordingly
The value parameter is typed as Primitive, which does not include arrays. However, in the case for FRAME_SUPPORT_FIELD, value is accessed as an array (value[0], value[1]), leading to a type mismatch. To resolve this issue, consider updating the Primitive type to include number[] to accurately reflect all possible types of value.
Apply this diff to update the Primitive type:
export type Primitive =
| number
| null
| string
| undefined
| { datetime: number };
+ | number[];Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| return formatDate(value?.datetime as number); | ||
| case DATE_TIME_FIELD: | ||
| // @ts-ignore | ||
| value = formatDateTime(value.datetime as number, timeZone); | ||
| return formatDateTime(value?.datetime as number, timeZone); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return prettify(String(value)); | ||
| // @ts-ignore | ||
| return prettify(value); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid suppressing type checking with @ts-ignore
The use of // @ts-ignore on lines 644, 647, and 650 suppresses TypeScript's type checking, which can mask potential issues. It's better to address the underlying type discrepancies to maintain type safety. Since value can be an object with a datetime property, refining the type definitions or using type guards can eliminate the need for @ts-ignore.
Consider removing the @ts-ignore comments and adjusting the code to satisfy the type checker. Here's how you might modify the code:
case DATE_FIELD:
- // @ts-ignore
- return formatDate(value?.datetime as number);
+ if (typeof value === "object" && value !== null && "datetime" in value) {
+ return formatDate(value.datetime);
+ }
case DATE_TIME_FIELD:
- // @ts-ignore
- return formatDateTime(value?.datetime as number, timeZone);
+ if (typeof value === "object" && value !== null && "datetime" in value) {
+ return formatDateTime(value.datetime, timeZone);
+ }This approach uses type guards to ensure value is an object with a datetime property before accessing it, thereby satisfying the type checker without ignoring type errors.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
* add dark orange indicator for buffering status * shouldn't play if timeline not initialized * fix edge cases in buffer manager * add onAnimationStutter * add onAnimationStutter * loadrange for imavid * remove log * use 30 as default frame rate / multiplier * add speed text on hover * fix effect dep bug * resolve promise when all samples addressed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/index.ts (2)
56-65: Improved parameter naming in addNewRange methodThe changes to the
addNewRangemethod are good:
- Renaming the parameter from
rangetonewRangeimproves clarity and consistency with the method name.- The method body correctly uses
newRangeinstead ofrange.These changes enhance readability and maintain the existing logic.
For consistency, consider updating the error message to use
newRangeinstead ofrange:- `invalid range: range[1] (value = ${newRange[1]}) must be >= range[0] (value = ${newRange[0]})` + `invalid range: newRange[1] (value = ${newRange[1]}) must be >= newRange[0] (value = ${newRange[0]})`
210-214: Improved null handling in getUnprocessedBufferRange methodThe changes to the
getUnprocessedBufferRangemethod are well-implemented:
- Updating the signature to accept
Readonly<BufferRange> | nullimproves flexibility.- Adding a null check prevents potential runtime errors when the input is null.
These changes enhance the robustness of the method without affecting its core logic.
For consistency with TypeScript best practices, consider using a non-null assertion operator (
!) when accessingrangeafter the null check:if (!range) { return null; } - const startContainedInRangeIndex = this.getRangeIndexForFrame(range[0]); + const startContainedInRangeIndex = this.getRangeIndexForFrame(range![0]); if (startContainedInRangeIndex === -1) { - return range; + return range!; } const newStart = this.buffers[startContainedInRangeIndex][1] + 1; // means input range is already contained, or "processed" - if (newStart > range[1]) { + if (newStart > range![1]) { return null; } - return [newStart, range[1]] as const; + return [newStart, range![1]] as const;This change would make it clear to TypeScript that
rangeis non-null in these contexts.app/packages/playback/src/views/PlaybackElements.tsx (3)
100-100: Approved: Color change for loading stateThe color change from "red" to "#a86738" for the loading state is a good improvement for the UI aesthetics. However, for better maintainability and consistency across the application, consider using a CSS variable instead of a hard-coded color value.
Consider refactoring the color value to use a CSS variable:
- loading: "#a86738", + loading: "var(--fo-seekbar-loading-color, #a86738)",This approach allows for easier theme changes and maintains consistency across the application.
173-175: Approved: Improved Speed control functionalityThe changes to the
Speedcomponent are well-implemented and improve user experience:
- The new
resetSpeedfunction allows for quick reset of playback speed.- The updated title attribute provides clear information about the current speed and reset functionality.
- Making the
SpeedIconclickable for resetting speed is an excellent UX improvement.To further enhance accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto theSpeedIcon:<SpeedIcon className={controlsStyles.lookerClickable} onClick={resetSpeed} + aria-label={`Current speed ${speed}x. Click to reset to 1x.`} />This change will improve the experience for users relying on screen readers.
Also applies to: 190-190, 194-194
203-203: Approved: Added title to speed input rangeAdding a title attribute to the input range element is a good improvement for usability. It provides users with a tooltip showing the current speed when hovering over the range input.
For consistency with the container's title, consider updating the input range title to include the "x" suffix:
- title={`${speed}`} + title={`${speed}x`}This small change ensures that the speed representation is consistent throughout the component.
app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/buffer-manager.test.ts (1)
94-104: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the test's purpose.The new test case "addBufferRangeToBuffer method - same ranges" is well-structured and correctly verifies that adding identical ranges doesn't create duplicate entries in the buffer. This is an important edge case to test.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this test case, for example:
// Verify that adding identical ranges doesn't create duplicate entriesThis would enhance the test's readability and make its purpose immediately clear to other developers.
app/packages/playback/src/lib/state.ts (2)
136-140: LGTM. Consider adding JSDoc comment for clarity.The addition of the
onAnimationStuttercallback is a good improvement for handling animation performance issues. The type definition is correct and the naming is clear.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to provide more context about when this callback is invoked and how it should be used. For example:
/** * Callback to be invoked when the animation experiences stuttering. * This can be used to implement performance optimizations or notify the user. */ onAnimationStutter?: () => void;
347-347: Good improvement. Consider enhancing error handling.The switch from
Promise.alltoPromise.allSettledis a good improvement that makes the code more robust by allowing it to proceed even if some promises are rejected.Consider enhancing the error handling to log or handle rejected promises from
Promise.allSettled. Here's a suggested improvement:const results = await Promise.allSettled(rangeLoadPromises); results.forEach((result, index) => { if (result.status === 'rejected') { console.error(`Range load promise ${index} rejected:`, result.reason); } }); bufferManager.addNewRange(newLoadRange); // Similar handling for renderPromises const renderResults = await Promise.allSettled(renderPromises); renderResults.forEach((result, index) => { if (result.status === 'rejected') { console.error(`Render promise ${index} rejected:`, result.reason); } }); set(_frameNumbers(name), newFrameNumber);This approach provides more detailed error information and allows for specific handling of failed promises if needed.
Also applies to: 366-367
app/packages/looker/src/elements/imavid/index.ts (2)
412-423: LGTM: New method added for buffer managementThe new
checkFetchBufferManagermethod is a good addition for managing buffer fetching. It efficiently checks for existing buffers before resuming the fetch process.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this method, similar to the one added for
ensureBuffers. This would improve consistency and help developers understand the method's role in the overall buffer management strategy.
461-465: LGTM: Improved buffer management logicThe modification to use either
ensureBuffersorcheckFetchBufferManagerbased on theisThumbnailproperty is a good improvement. It allows for different buffer management strategies for thumbnail and non-thumbnail imavids, enhancing the flexibility of the class.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind this conditional logic. This would help future developers understand why different methods are used for thumbnails and non-thumbnails, improving code maintainability.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (2)
Line range hint
233-240: Avoid usingsetIntervalfor polling; use event listeners or promises instead.Using
setIntervalto poll every 10ms is inefficient and can lead to performance issues. Consider replacing the polling mechanism with an event listener or a promise that resolves whentotalFrameCountbecomes available.Refactor the
readyWhenfunction to use an event-driven approach:const readyWhen = useCallback(async () => { - return new Promise<void>((resolve) => { - // hack: wait for total frame count to be resolved - let intervalId; - intervalId = setInterval(() => { - if (totalFrameCountRef.current) { - clearInterval(intervalId); - resolve(); - } - }, 10); - }); + if (totalFrameCountRef.current) { + return Promise.resolve(); + } + return new Promise<void>((resolve) => { + const handleTotalFrameCount = () => { + if (totalFrameCountRef.current) { + resolve(); + window.removeEventListener('totalFrameCountReady', handleTotalFrameCount); + } + }; + window.addEventListener('totalFrameCountReady', handleTotalFrameCount); + }); }, []);Ensure that an event
'totalFrameCountReady'is dispatched whentotalFrameCountbecomes available.
Line range hint
309-314: Replace polling fortotalFrameCountwith an event-driven approach.Polling with
setIntervalevery 10ms to checktotalFrameCountis not efficient. Consider emitting an event or using a callback whentotalFrameCountis set inframeStoreController.Modify the effect to listen for an event:
useEffect(() => { - // hack: poll every 10ms for total frame count - // replace with event listener or callback - let intervalId = setInterval(() => { - const totalFrameCount = - imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.totalFrameCount; - if (totalFrameCount) { - setTotalFrameCount(totalFrameCount); - clearInterval(intervalId); - } - }, 10); - - return () => clearInterval(intervalId); + const handleTotalFrameCount = () => { + const totalFrameCount = + imaVidLookerRef.current?.frameStoreController.totalFrameCount; + if (totalFrameCount) { + setTotalFrameCount(totalFrameCount); + } + }; + window.addEventListener('totalFrameCountReady', handleTotalFrameCount); + return () => { + window.removeEventListener('totalFrameCountReady', handleTotalFrameCount); + }; }, [looker]);Trigger the
'totalFrameCountReady'event whentotalFrameCountis available inframeStoreController.app/packages/playback/src/lib/use-create-timeline.ts (1)
273-277: Consider adding error handling toonAnimationStuttercallbackTo enhance robustness, wrap the invocation of
onAnimationStutterRef.currentin a try-catch block. This prevents unexpected errors within the callback from disrupting the animation flow.Apply this diff to add error handling:
queueMicrotask(() => { - onAnimationStutterRef.current?.(); + try { + onAnimationStutterRef.current?.(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error in onAnimationStutter callback:', error); + } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (7 hunks)
- app/packages/looker/src/elements/imavid/index.ts (3 hunks)
- app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/controller.ts (3 hunks)
- app/packages/playback/src/lib/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- app/packages/playback/src/lib/state.ts (3 hunks)
- app/packages/playback/src/lib/use-create-timeline.ts (7 hunks)
- app/packages/playback/src/views/PlaybackElements.tsx (4 hunks)
- app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/buffer-manager.test.ts (1 hunks)
- app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/index.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (9)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/looker/src/elements/imavid/index.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/controller.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/playback/src/lib/constants.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/playback/src/lib/state.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/playback/src/lib/use-create-timeline.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/playback/src/views/PlaybackElements.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/buffer-manager.test.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/index.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/packages/utilities/src/buffer-manager/index.ts (1)
14-15: Improved constructor with immutability and defensive copyingThe changes to the constructor are well-implemented:
- Using
Readonly<Buffers>enforces immutability of the input, which is a good TypeScript practice.- Spreading the input array (
[...buffers]) creates a new copy, preventing unintended mutations of the original input.These changes enhance type safety and reduce the risk of side effects.
app/packages/looker/src/elements/imavid/index.ts (1)
365-366: LGTM: Helpful comment addedThe added comment provides valuable context about the
ensureBuffersmethod, clarifying its purpose for legacy thumbnail imavid functionality. This improves code maintainability and helps developers understand when to use this method.app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/controller.ts (1)
168-170: Verify the necessity of changingkeygetter topublicChanging the
keyproperty from aprivateto apublicgetter increases its accessibility. Please ensure that this change is required for external access and does not expose sensitive information or violate encapsulation principles.app/packages/playback/src/lib/use-create-timeline.ts (4)
55-61: SynchronizeonAnimationStutterRefwith prop changesThe
useEffectcorrectly updatesonAnimationStutterRef.currentwhenevernewTimelineProps.onAnimationStutterchanges, ensuring that the ref remains in sync with the latest prop value.
147-147: InitializeonAnimationStutterRefwith initial prop valueInitializing
onAnimationStutterRefwithnewTimelineProps.onAnimationStutterensures that the ref has the correct initial value. Coupled with the syncing effect, this setup correctly handles prop updates.
156-158: Guardplayfunction with timeline initialization checkAdding the check for
!isTimelineInitializedprevents potential errors by ensuring thatplay()is only executed when the timeline is ready.
292-294: Add error handling tosetFrameNumberpromise chainIncluding a
.catchblock with logging ensures that any errors encountered duringsetFrameNumberare properly captured and logged, aiding in debugging.
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
| export const DEFAULT_FRAME_NUMBER = 1; | |||
| export const DEFAULT_LOOP = false; | |||
| export const DEFAULT_SPEED = 1; | |||
| export const DEFAULT_TARGET_FRAME_RATE = 29.97; | |||
| export const DEFAULT_TARGET_FRAME_RATE = 30; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update the remaining instance of the old frame rate in state.ts.
An instance of 29.97 was found in app/packages/playback/src/lib/state.ts. If this is part of a comment, please ensure it is updated to reflect the new default frame rate of 30 fps to maintain consistency and avoid confusion.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the intentionality of changing the default frame rate.
The DEFAULT_TARGET_FRAME_RATE has been changed from 29.97 to 30 fps. While 30 fps is a standard frame rate, this change might affect timing calculations in the playback system, especially if there are any components still expecting the NTSC standard of 29.97 fps.
Please confirm:
- Is this change intentional?
- Have all dependent components been updated to handle this new frame rate?
- Are there any timing-sensitive features that might be affected by this change?
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script to check for any occurrences of the old frame rate value:
This will help ensure that all relevant parts of the codebase have been updated to use the new frame rate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of 29.97 in the codebase
rg -i '29\.97' --type typescript
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of 29.97 in TypeScript files
rg -i '29\.97' --type ts
Length of output: 88
| @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ export class BufferManager { | |||
| // if current interval is not overlapping with stack top, | |||
| // push it to the stack | |||
| if (!areTwoRangesConsecutive && top[1] < rangesWithoutMetadata[i][0]) { | |||
| stack.push(rangesWithoutMetadata[i]); | |||
| stack.push([...rangesWithoutMetadata[i]]); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize array push operation
In the addNewRange method, the following line creates an unnecessary new array:
stack.push([...rangesWithoutMetadata[i]]);This spread operation is redundant as rangesWithoutMetadata[i] is already an array.
Consider simplifying this line to:
stack.push(rangesWithoutMetadata[i]);This change will improve performance by avoiding the creation of a new array on each push operation.
| // subtract/add by two because 1) cursor is one based and 2) cursor here translates to "after" the cursor | ||
| return this.fetchMore(range[0] - 2, range[1] - range[0] + 2).finally( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify the use of magic numbers in fetchMore parameters
The adjustments -2 and +2 in the fetchMore call can be confusing. Although there's a comment explaining the reasoning, consider defining constants or adding more descriptive comments to enhance clarity and maintainability.
Example:
// Define constants for clarity
const CURSOR_ADJUSTMENT = 2;
// Adjust the comment to explain the constants
// Adjusting by CURSOR_ADJUSTMENT because 1) cursor is one-based and 2) "after" the cursor interpretation
return this.fetchMore(
range[0] - CURSOR_ADJUSTMENT,
range[1] - range[0] + CURSOR_ADJUSTMENT
).finally(() => {
this.fetchBufferManager.removeMetadataFromBufferRange(index);
});| Promise.all(imageFetchPromises) | ||
| .then((sampleIds) => { | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < sampleIds.length; i++) { | ||
| const frameIndex = frameIndices.next().value; | ||
| const sampleId = sampleIds[i]; | ||
| this.store.frameIndex.set(frameIndex, sampleId); | ||
| this.store.reverseFrameIndex.set(sampleId, frameIndex); | ||
| } | ||
| resolve(); | ||
| }) | ||
| .then(() => { | ||
| const newRange = [ | ||
| Number(data.samples.edges[0].cursor) + 1, | ||
| Number( | ||
| data.samples.edges[data.samples.edges.length - 1].cursor | ||
| ) + 1, | ||
| ]); | ||
|
|
||
| resolve(); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| ] as BufferRange; | ||
|
|
||
| this.storeBufferManager.addNewRange(newRange); | ||
|
|
||
| window.dispatchEvent( | ||
| new CustomEvent("fetchMore", { | ||
| detail: { | ||
| id: this.key, | ||
| }, | ||
| bubbles: false, | ||
| }) | ||
| ); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor nested promise chains using async/await for better readability
The current implementation uses nested .then() calls, which can make the code harder to read and maintain. Refactoring this section using async/await syntax would improve readability and simplify error handling.
Refactored code:
public async fetchMore(cursor: number, count: number) {
const variables = this.page(cursor, count);
const fetchUid = `${this.key}-${cursor}-${variables.count}`;
try {
// Perform the GraphQL query
const data = await fetchQuery<foq.paginateSamplesQuery>(
this.environment,
foq.paginateSamples,
variables,
{
fetchPolicy: "store-or-network",
networkCacheConfig: {
transactionId: fetchUid,
},
}
).toPromise();
if (data?.samples?.edges?.length) {
const imageFetchPromisesMap: Map<number, Promise<string>> = new Map();
for (const { cursor, node } of data.samples.edges) {
if (!node) {
continue;
}
const sample = {
...node,
image: null,
} as ModalSampleExtendedWithImage;
const sampleId = sample.sample["_id"] as string;
if (sample.__typename !== "ImageSample") {
throw new Error("only image samples supported");
}
const frameIndex = Number(cursor) + 1;
this.store.samples.set(sampleId, sample);
imageFetchPromisesMap.set(
frameIndex,
this.store.fetchImageForSample(
sampleId,
sample["urls"],
this.mediaField
)
);
}
const frameIndices = imageFetchPromisesMap.keys();
const imageFetchPromises = imageFetchPromisesMap.values();
const sampleIds = await Promise.all(imageFetchPromises);
for (let i = 0; i < sampleIds.length; i++) {
const frameIndex = frameIndices.next().value;
const sampleId = sampleIds[i];
this.store.frameIndex.set(frameIndex, sampleId);
this.store.reverseFrameIndex.set(sampleId, frameIndex);
}
const newRange = [
Number(data.samples.edges[0].cursor) + 1,
Number(
data.samples.edges[data.samples.edges.length - 1].cursor
) + 1,
] as BufferRange;
this.storeBufferManager.addNewRange(newRange);
window.dispatchEvent(
new CustomEvent("fetchMore", {
detail: {
id: this.key,
},
bubbles: false,
})
);
}
// Resolve after successful execution
return;
} catch (error) {
// Handle errors appropriately
console.error(
`Error fetching buffer range [${cursor}, ${cursor + count}]:`,
error
);
throw error;
} finally {
// Remove metadata from buffer range if necessary
this.fetchBufferManager.removeMetadataFromBufferRange(index);
}
}Ensure proper error handling in Promises
In the current implementation of fetchMore, the Promise only calls resolve() but does not handle rejection. If an error occurs, the promise may neither resolve nor reject, potentially causing unhandled promise rejections or hanging operations. Make sure to handle both success and error cases by calling reject(error) when necessary.
Consider updating the subscription to handle errors:
this.subscription = fetchQuery<foq.paginateSamplesQuery>(
this.environment,
foq.paginateSamples,
variables,
{
fetchPolicy: "store-or-network",
networkCacheConfig: {
transactionId: fetchUid,
},
}
).subscribe({
next: (data) => {
// Existing success logic
},
error: (err) => {
console.error("Subscription error:", err);
_reject(err);
},
});Also, ensure that _reject is properly used in the Promise executor:
return new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => {
// Replace `_reject` with `reject` in the executor function
});| imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({ | ||
| playing: true, | ||
| })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent null checks when accessing imaVidLookerRef.current.
In some instances, optional chaining is used (e.g., imaVidLookerRef.current?.element), but in other places, it's omitted. For consistency and to prevent potential runtime errors, consistently apply null checks when accessing imaVidLookerRef.current.
Review and update the following code segments:
registerOnPlayCallback(() => {
- imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
+ imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
playing: true,
}));
});
registerOnPauseCallback(() => {
- imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
+ imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
playing: false,
}));
});
registerOnSeekCallbacks({
start: () => {
- imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
+ imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
seeking: true,
}));
},
end: () => {
- imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
+ imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.update(() => ({
seeking: false,
}));
},
});Ensure that all accesses to imaVidLookerRef.current use optional chaining or appropriate null checks.
Also applies to: 282-284, 289-296
| const imaVidLookerRef = | ||
| activeLookerRef as unknown as React.MutableRefObject<ImaVidLooker>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify type assertion for imaVidLookerRef.
The current type assertion uses as unknown as, which is unnecessarily complex. You can simplify it by directly casting activeLookerRef to the desired type.
Apply this diff to simplify the type assertion:
- const imaVidLookerRef =
- activeLookerRef as unknown as React.MutableRefObject<ImaVidLooker>;
+ const imaVidLookerRef =
+ activeLookerRef as React.MutableRefObject<ImaVidLooker>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const imaVidLookerRef = | |
| activeLookerRef as unknown as React.MutableRefObject<ImaVidLooker>; | |
| const imaVidLookerRef = | |
| activeLookerRef as React.MutableRefObject<ImaVidLooker>; |
| const storeBufferManager = | ||
| imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.storeBufferManager; | ||
| const fetchBufferManager = | ||
| imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.fetchBufferManager; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null checks for imaVidLookerRef.current to prevent runtime errors.
Accessing imaVidLookerRef.current without ensuring it's defined could lead to runtime errors if current is null or undefined. Consider adding checks or using optional chaining.
Update the code to safely access imaVidLookerRef.current:
const loadRange = React.useCallback(
async (range: Readonly<BufferRange>) => {
- const storeBufferManager =
- imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.storeBufferManager;
- const fetchBufferManager =
- imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.fetchBufferManager;
+ if (!imaVidLookerRef.current) {
+ // Handle the case when current is null or undefined
+ return;
+ }
+ const storeBufferManager =
+ imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.storeBufferManager;
+ const fetchBufferManager =
+ imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.fetchBufferManager;
// Rest of the code...📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const storeBufferManager = | |
| imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.storeBufferManager; | |
| const fetchBufferManager = | |
| imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.fetchBufferManager; | |
| if (!imaVidLookerRef.current) { | |
| // Handle the case when current is null or undefined | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const storeBufferManager = | |
| imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.storeBufferManager; | |
| const fetchBufferManager = | |
| imaVidLookerRef.current.frameStoreController.fetchBufferManager; |
| const onAnimationStutter = useCallback(() => { | ||
| imaVidLookerRef.current?.element.checkFetchBufferManager(); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve handling of imaVidLookerRef.current in onAnimationStutter.
In the onAnimationStutter callback, consider adding a null check for imaVidLookerRef.current to prevent potential runtime errors.
Update the code to include a null check:
const onAnimationStutter = useCallback(() => {
- imaVidLookerRef.current?.element.checkFetchBufferManager();
+ imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.checkFetchBufferManager();
}, []);This ensures that both current and element are defined before calling checkFetchBufferManager().
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const onAnimationStutter = useCallback(() => { | |
| imaVidLookerRef.current?.element.checkFetchBufferManager(); | |
| }, []); | |
| const onAnimationStutter = useCallback(() => { | |
| imaVidLookerRef.current?.element?.checkFetchBufferManager(); | |
| }, []); |
Make v1.0.0 migration robust to in-progress terminations
fix state scope missing in some panel hooks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- app/packages/spaces/src/state.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/spaces/src/state.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/spaces/src/state.ts (2)
132-132: Enhancement: Added explicit typing topanelIdToScopeAtomDefining
panelIdToScopeAtomwith thePanelIdToScopeTypeinterface improves type safety and code clarity. This alignment with TypeScript best practices helps prevent potential type-related errors.
141-144: Improvement: DefinedPanelIdToScopeTypefor better maintainabilityIntroducing the
PanelIdToScopeTypetype enhances code readability and maintainability. It clearly specifies the expected structure ofpanelIdToScopeAtom, aiding in future development and minimizing misunderstandings.
| const fallbackScope = get(panelIdToScopeAtom)[panelId]; | ||
| const computedScope = scope ?? fallbackScope; | ||
| const stateAtom = getStateAtom(local, computedScope); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential undefined fallbackScope in setter
Similar to the getter, if panelId is not present in panelIdToScopeAtom, fallbackScope may be undefined. This could affect the stateAtom retrieval and subsequent state updates. Ensure that computedScope is valid to maintain consistent state management.
Consider:
const fallbackScope = get(panelIdToScopeAtom)[panelId];
const computedScope = scope ?? fallbackScope ?? "defaultScope";Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const fallbackScope = get(panelIdToScopeAtom)[panelId]; | ||
| const computedScope = scope ?? fallbackScope; | ||
| const stateAtom = getStateAtom(local, computedScope); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential undefined fallbackScope when panelId is not found
If panelId does not exist in panelIdToScopeAtom, fallbackScope will be undefined. This could lead to unexpected behavior when computing computedScope. Consider handling the case where fallbackScope is undefined to ensure computedScope receives a valid scope.
You might add a default scope or explicitly check for undefined:
const fallbackScope = get(panelIdToScopeAtom)[panelId];
+const computedScope = scope ?? fallbackScope ?? "defaultScope";Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
* fix flashlight rerendering bug in dynamic groups * remove log
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (4)
6-9: Approved: Good use of React.memo and useId hookThe addition of the
useIdhook and wrapping the component withReact.memoare good practices that can potentially improve performance. However, given the component's complexity and numerous dependencies, the effectiveness of memoization might be limited.Consider breaking down this component into smaller, more focused components to maximize the benefits of memoization. This could involve extracting some of the complex logic or state management into custom hooks or child components.
Also applies to: 49-49
Line range hint
51-178: Approved: Effective use of hooks and state managementThe component demonstrates a good understanding of React hooks and Recoil for state management. The use of custom hooks,
useCallback,useRef, anduseLayoutEffectshows attention to performance optimizations.To further improve maintainability and readability:
- Consider extracting some of the complex logic into separate custom hooks. For example, the Flashlight initialization and management could be moved to a custom hook.
- The
useLayoutEffecthooks could potentially be combined or simplified to reduce the number of side effects.- Consider using the
useEventhook (if available in your React version) for theselectSamplefunction to avoid unnecessary re-renders.
Line range hint
80-124: Suggestion: Optimize Flashlight initialization and managementThe Flashlight initialization and management logic is quite complex and tightly coupled with the component. Consider the following improvements:
- Extract the Flashlight initialization into a custom hook for better separation of concerns.
- Split the render function into smaller, more focused functions for creating and updating lookers.
- Use memoization for the render function to prevent unnecessary re-creations.
Example of extracting Flashlight initialization:
const useFlashlight = (options) => { const [flashlight] = useState(() => new Flashlight(options)); useEffect(() => { return () => flashlight.detach(); }, [flashlight]); return flashlight; };Then use it in the component:
const flashlight = useFlashlight({ horizontal: true, containerId: DYNAMIC_GROUPS_FLASHLIGHT_CONTAINER_ID, elementId: DYNAMIC_GROUPS_FLASHLIGHT_ELEMENT_ID, // ... other options });
Line range hint
168-178: Suggestion: Improve component structure and stylingThe component's return statement is simple, but there's room for improvement:
- Consider moving the inline styles to a separate CSS file or using a styled-component for better maintainability and separation of concerns.
- The empty div could be replaced with a more semantic HTML element or a custom styled component that better represents its purpose.
Example using a styled-component:
import styled from 'styled-components'; const FlashlightContainer = styled.div` display: block; width: 100%; height: 100%; position: relative; `; // In the component return <FlashlightContainer id={id} />;This approach would make the component more readable and easier to maintain.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupCarousel.tsx (3)
11-11: Questioning the use ofReact.memowithout propsWrapping
DynamicGroupCarouselwithReact.memomight not provide performance benefits since the component does not receive any props.React.memois typically used to memoize functional components that render the same output given the same props. Consider whetherReact.memois necessary here.
35-37: Review the use ofuseReffor state trackingUsing
groupByValueRefto mirrorgroupByValueis a workaround to access the latest state inside thesetIntervalcallback. While this approach works, it's generally better to avoid such patterns when possible. Refactoring the code to eliminate the need foruseRefin this context could improve clarity.
74-74: Evaluate forcing remount withkeypropSetting the
keyprop togroupByValueonDynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapperforces the component to remount whengroupByValuechanges. While this ensures the component updates, frequent remounts can affect performance and reset the component's internal state. Consider updating the component to respond to prop changes without requiring a remount.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupCarousel.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupCarousel.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
📓 Learnings (1)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupCarousel.tsx (2)
Learnt from: sashankaryal PR: voxel51/fiftyone#4863 File: app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupCarousel.tsx:39-48 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T23:14:11.193Z Learning: In `DynamicGroupCarousel`, using `useRecoilValue(fos.groupByFieldValue)` causes the flashlight to behave unexpectedly—specifically, it resets to the front when scrolling the carousel and selecting samples. Therefore, `setInterval` is currently used as a workaround to update `groupByValue`.Learnt from: sashankaryal PR: voxel51/fiftyone#4863 File: app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupCarousel.tsx:74-74 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T23:14:46.454Z Learning: In `DynamicGroupCarousel`, setting the `key` prop on `DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper` to `groupByValue` is intentional to force a remount when `groupByValue` changes.
| const getGroupByFieldValue = useRecoilCallback(({ snapshot }) => () => { | ||
| const groupByField = snapshot.getLoadable(fos.groupByFieldValue).getValue(); | ||
| return groupByField; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const [groupByValue, setGroupByValue] = useState(getGroupByFieldValue()); | ||
| const groupByValueRef = React.useRef(groupByValue); | ||
| groupByValueRef.current = groupByValue; | ||
|
|
||
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const intervalId = window.setInterval(() => { | ||
| const groupByFieldValue = getGroupByFieldValue(); | ||
| if (groupByFieldValue !== groupByValueRef.current) { | ||
| setGroupByValue(groupByFieldValue); | ||
| } | ||
| }, 50); | ||
|
|
||
| return () => window.clearInterval(intervalId); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using setInterval for state synchronization
Using setInterval to poll for changes in groupByFieldValue is inefficient and may lead to performance issues. Consider subscribing directly to Recoil state changes or using a React Effect that depends on the relevant state.
One potential solution is to use useRecoilTransactionObserver_UNSTABLE to listen for changes in groupByFieldValue without causing unintended side effects. This allows the component to update when the state changes without polling.
import { useRecoilTransactionObserver_UNSTABLE } from "recoil";
useRecoilTransactionObserver_UNSTABLE(({ snapshot }) => {
const groupByFieldValue = snapshot.getLoadable(fos.groupByFieldValue).getValue();
if (groupByFieldValue !== groupByValueRef.current) {
setGroupByValue(groupByFieldValue);
}
});| /** | ||
| * BIG HACK: TODO: FIX ME | ||
| * | ||
| * Problem = flashlight is not re-rendering when group by field changes. | ||
| * Solution was to key it by groupByValue, but when the component | ||
| * subscribes to the groupByFieldValue using useRecoilValue(fos.groupByFieldValue), | ||
| * while it solves the problem, it causes flashlight to behave weirdly. | ||
| * (try scrolling carousel and selecting samples, flashlight will reset to the front) | ||
| * | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the TODO and improve the workaround
The comment indicates that the current implementation is a temporary workaround ("BIG HACK") using setInterval to handle re-rendering when groupByField changes. Polling every 50ms can impact performance and isn't an ideal solution. It's important to find a better approach to manage state changes.
Would you like assistance in refactoring this code to eliminate the need for setInterval? I can help explore alternative methods to handle the state updates efficiently.
Small bug fix for Numerical Field in Summary Field Operator
Merge
release/v1.0.0todevelopSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
onAnimationStuttercallback for better animation handling.resetSpeedfunction in the playback speed component.Bug Fixes
Style
Tests
BufferManagerto verify handling of duplicate ranges.