Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dont manage .rspec{,_parallel} anymore #895

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

requires puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper#451 since puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper#446 the rake task configures the output so we don't need .rspec_parallel anymore.

Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we somehow ensure puppetlabs_spec_helper is new enough to include the changes?

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Member Author

Yes. I will update voxpupuli-test to depend on the latest PSH as soon as it's released. Then we can depend on the newest voxpupuli-test in modulesync_config.

bastelfreak added a commit to bastelfreak/voxpupuli-test that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
latest version manages rspec like we need that. That means by requiering
7.3, we can delete .rspec/.rspec_parallel from modulesync_config.

voxpupuli/modulesync_config#895
requires puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper#451
since puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper#446 the
rake task configures the output so we don't need .rspec_parallel
anymore.

Requires also puppetlabs/puppetlabs_spec_helper#452
bastelfreak added a commit to bastelfreak/puppet-example that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
@bastelfreak bastelfreak merged commit 3c205af into voxpupuli:master May 23, 2024
4 checks passed
@bastelfreak bastelfreak changed the title Dont manage .rspec_parallel anymore Dont manage .rspec{,_parallel} anymore May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants